Pat McQuaid, President of the UCI yesterday confirmed that the organisation would double the length of the statutory ban for those convicted of doping if it considered them to have been wilfully cheating. Commenting on the latest doping scandal to hit professional road racing he confirmed that if Schumacher, Kohl and Piepoli had commited their offences at next year’s Tour they would be facing a four year ban. "In these cases, considering that these guys were given the product and then went and took it for the Tour de France, it would be very much classified as wilful cheating. "Next year, a rider in that position would face a four-year ban." McQuaid makes no secret of the fact that he would like to see convicted drugs cheats banned from cycling for life, but admits that up until now the UCI’s hands have been tied by the fact that it is signed up to the world anti doping code which lays down statutory punishments for convicted dopers. One of the reasons that the code’s sanctions go no further than a two year ban is that the bans have to be able to stick in legal jurisdictions across the world. Up until now it has been felt that longer bans would open governing bodies and the anti-doping agencies up to legal challenge in both Europe and the United States. From January 2009 though the code allows for more flexibility and for governing bodies to judge each case on its merits. The UCI will impose sanctions on a case-by-case basis, said McQuaid, and cyclists will be judged on the gravity of the infringement and in particular the nature of the substance.
- News

Doping cheats face four year ban from January

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Why not use winter to explore other interests and thus use it to your advantage? It could easily turn out as a win-win: you recover from cycling-related injuries and fatigue, get to miss your favourite pastime and rekindle your love for it or who knows, maybe even discover a new one! Oh, did I mention that changing your movement patterns is also quite awesome for the body, too?
@hotspanners I think Jo's issue is with slop. I didn't get the impression that this article makes you look rubbish as a club! Hopefully CX league will take better steps next time and include input from the clubs. Perhaps Jo will make it clear that it was generated by the league opposed to individual clubs.
I'm more interested in the opinion of the person who's actually ridden the bike.
@DS2025 I literally just found out it was done by the CX league, which explains why Jo had seen so much slop, and why I wasn’t aware of it until it was too late. I think the article needs to be amended - Jo’s issue is with the CX league, not the clubs. This article makes us look rubbish!
This was my children's headteacher and I had spoken to him just weeks before, he was a terrific fella. To put this in context, I regularly cycle down the same route as this incident, it is too narrow with many impatient commuters on it. There is no cycle provision, the surface is terrible on the whole and little obvious effort is made to reduce the speed of motorists. There is a car in my road right now with no front number plate (read into that what you will), GMP say it's not their job, the council say it's not their job either, the DVLA are my last opportunity. I have no faith I. Then to act. The pavement on both sides of my road is impossible to walk down, the local pcso said he won't act, and the local councillor visited and then also did nothing. I regularly cycle with my son (18 years old) but I wouldn't let him go out on his own because I have suspect too many of the local motorists have lite care for the safety of others a the regulation is nil.
@hotspanners Who created it? A member or a complete random person? If it was a randomer then I guess it could be made clear in the article. If it was a member then what record is to correct? I don't think Jo was unfairly criticising your group, just a general grumble. I must say, as far as AI slop goes, I didn't mind the Kingston Wheelers one too much.
That's hilarious. The thick end of £6.5k for an aluminium frame on a bike that weighs almost 8.5kg. They're having a larf. The hardest of hard no's from me.
@MoralHazard From what little I have read of Richardson, his life was pretty much 'ruined' in the first place.
@whosatthewheel "Reducing the speeds wouldn’t have helped in this case" Yes, it would, because knowing the junction layout very well (I live nearby) the driver approached it at high speed, likely did a quick check to his right (from where Mr Mullins approached), and continued on at high speed. Making it a T-junction would have forced him to slow down to a crawl before turning - else he'd have gone through the hedge opposite.
@andystow That is, or at least used to be, the notorious cost/benefit analysis applied to roads by the Department for Transport.