What started off as Ridgeback and then became Genesis is now Ridgeback again. Confused? Don’t be, it’s all pretty straightforward. Genesis launched off the back of Ridgeback and their flat barred bikes (they claim to have been the first…) have been well received over the years. More recently, Genesis have started branching out into MTB and the decision has been made to keep going in that direction, so the flat barred stable has been returned to the mother lode. Renamed Flight for 09, the bikes have a slightly chunkier urban feel to them, though they still look on the quick side of the spectrum. The high end 05 model sports 10spd Ultegra transmission, discs and sensible finishing kit and Ridgeback reckon the final bike is under 21lb. We couldn’t check with the road.cc scales of justice because the bike was bolted to the stand and the allen keys had gone walkies. They’ve also slackened the headtube and the more relaxed geometry is apparently more friendly on the road, but we’ll reserve judgement on that till we’ve actually ridden it. Ridgeback’s decision to go with discs (the Genesis range was exclusively V-brake) is an interesting one; most of the really fast urban machines have opted to keep with the lighter Vs. Again, we’ll see how it affects the ride when we can get our hands on one. 
The Genesis day range has been retired save for the Day One, which is reincarnated as a Reynolds-tubed singlespeed with ‘cross tyres in the ‘quirky’ supporting Genesis non-MTB lineup which also includes the excellent Flyer. 
Further down the range the bikes are more Sirrus/FX – like, with good road kit and mini-Vs, but there’s also a nice hub geared model, the Flight 04.
Genesis Day becomes Ridgeback Flight for 09
Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
That’s honestly the best 32” bike I’ve seen yet. Avona’s road bike is also beautiful except for the tall stack height, if they ever release a race bike I’m in.
32 inch wheels are here to stay until the next new wonder product hits the market...
@Gd29 Redshift regularly have sales with 25% off, so you should be able to pick them up for under £40 at some point
@SVXY Yet again it's highly impressive how are you know the exact circumstances of this incident, now down to the exact type of footwear Ms.Tanton was sporting at the time. There are numerous types of all-terrain/hiking sandals that have far better grip than a standard pair of trainers. And once again do explain how having shoes without gaps in the uppers would have prevented Dick from driving straight into her from behind? No actually, don't bother.
@SVXY Of course because cycling on a 60mph road is far more dangerous than cycling in a 30mph zone and you need footwear with the strongest grip to react quicker if needed
@SVXY So sandals are permissible footwear for cycling if you're riding at 15 mph in a 30 mph zone but they are not permissible footwear for cycling if you are riding at 15 mph in a 60 mph zone? I'm afraid this is how trolls always give themselves away because clearly no human being with the capacity to operate a computer with sufficient adroitness to post a reply could genuinely be that stupid.
mdavidford It says you can ride 2 abreast and must have consideration for other road users. So if you ride three or more abreast you could be prosecuted for careless cycling with your inconsideration for other road users under the highway code used as evidence by the CPS
I’ve got a G-Line. I quite like the look of some of that bling. I can’t imagine any of it will be cheap though. :( It’s already quite an expensive bike.
@SVXY It does not say you can't ride three or more abreast. It does not say that to do so would be inconsiderate. I'm afraid your opinion that it would be has no particular legal status.
@SVXY Rule 66 of the highway code says you can ride two abreast but to also 'be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in groups.' It does not say you can ride three or four abreast which would not be considerate of the needs of other road users. As the highway code is used by prosecution lawyers as evidence to convict in Road Traffic Act offences cases you certainly could therefore be prosecuted and convicted for careless cycling if cycling three or four abreast
