"I know that I'm interested in economics, and would like to know more about it, and I want to find out if it's something for me,” he said. “That's the philosophy I have when I decide something.
"Obviously, I've thought about what I could do, and I decided to do it because I think it will be helpful for me, but the most important thing is whether I'm interested in it and curious about it, so we'll see what I can do with it in the future. I think nobody knows exactly what will happen before they decide something – at least that's how it's always been for me."
Kittel and his wife are also expecting their first child. The German sprinter retired in August and it doesn’t sound like he’s missing the world of pro cycling yet.
“If you ride your bike, you experience nature. If you ride alone, you can really focus on yourself and get rid of your everyday problems. But when you live it as a professional, it's a totally different story."
Speaking to Cycling News about leaving racing behind, he said: "I really like the fact that all the expectation is gone," Kittel says. "You're not the centre of attention anymore, whereas, as a sprinter, you always are. That's a definite change. I'm really proud of what I achieved in my career, and I still love the sport, but it's very nice not to have that pressure and expectation.
"A huge differences is that I was in a very strict organisation and plan as a professional, and now I'm free. For me, personally – and it's a very individual thing – I love to make my own decisions and choose things I like instead of being in this very strict environment."
“If you ride your bike, you experience nature. If you ride alone, you can really focus on yourself and get rid of your everyday problems. But when you live it as a professional, it's a totally different story."
Add new comment
14 comments
Marcel Kittel should consider a career in acting. He made the script come alive in the Alpecin adverts.
"Spaghetti chucking"? (pause for quick google) Ah, I see
Neal Rogers of CyclingTips gave a pretty good assessment of why California's "Equal Pay Law" should not have had any impact on ToC going on "hiatus". The prize purse for the men was about $100,000 but the total cost of the event was about $10,000,000/year. The idea that an additional $100,000 to the total cost of an event that never came close to breaking even was the catalyst to kill it is laughable. Just admit you're more than a little sexist and don't value women's racing.
Why on earth should someone who doesn't place much value on women's cycling be accused of sexism? Might it not be because that branch of the sport is comprised of shorter, slower races that offer only a fraction of the excitement offered by the men's?
Wow! Mike, baby, have you *seen* any women's races? I've only seen them on TV but there they seem far more exciting & less predictable than most men's races. & IME all bike racing, regardless of gender, is tedious beyond belief watched live - stand in the sun for hours, couple of police motorbikes go by, then whooosh! peloton flies by @ 45 kmh, blink & you miss it, & that's it, go home. Might be a bit more interesting on a big mountain somewhere & I'd guess the atmosphere on the Champs Elysees when the last stage of the TdF is coming through makes up for a lot, but generally, no...
Clearly Mike has never watched a women's race and can't count his balls and get the same number twice.
Zwift was all over the halloween theme yesterday afternoon:
http://zwiftinsider.com/?s=halloween
90 years! They literally threw away the key. Good.
Is "My client doesn't usually drink, but his friends gave him too much tequila so he was blind drunk" what passes for a mitigating circumstance in 'Merica?
Given that he's just been banged up for over 90 years - apparently not.
I get that, but reading it implies that the defence (should that be defense?) attorney thought it was a mitigating circumstance...
They tried to play that card, it didn't work - people will try all sorts of nonsense to try and get off but that doesn't make it something considered reasonable, even by the attorney, just more spaghetti to chuck at the wall.
Yeah, spaghetti-chucking is expected if anything even more on the American side of the pond. You don't pay defense attorneys to believe the things they say, you pay them to say them. Whatever they come up with is the obligatory "borrowed friend's water bottle" of the justice system.
90years :-O, here they'd get a 6 month driving ban