Peter Sagan and Richard Carapaz were both present at today’s launch of the Giro d’Italia 2020 route in Milan (see post below for route details).
Carapaz is heading from Movistar to Team Ineos, and with their wealth of Grand Tour contenders, it’s too early to say whether he will be in Budapest to start the defence of his title.
Geraint Thomas has already signalled his intention to target the Giro, leaving the way clear for Chris Froome and this year’s Tour de France winner Egan Bernal to ride that race.
What does seem certain though, is that Bora-Hansgrohe’s Peter Sagan will ride the Giro – improbably, given he started his career with an Italian team, for the first time; previously, he’s preferred to spend May racing the Tour of California, where he has enjoyed great success.
Carapaz said: “The 2019 Giro d'Italia will always be a very important moment in my history as a pro rider, just thinking about it excites me!
“I owe so much to my parents and to all the people who helped me become the rider I am today. I will never stop telling the kids in Ecuador who start cycling how important it is to pursue their dreams.
“I really hope to be at the start of the Giro next year. It is a very interesting route with stages that present many surprises. In the last week, there are a lot of mountains, the Stelvio could be decisive, I really hope to be there.”
Sagan commented: “It's nice to be here today at the presentation of the Giro d'Italia 2020 route. I want to announce that I will be at the start in Budapest. It is still a few months away but I can announce that I will be there.
“I really like this route, right from the first stages in Hungary. I am sure there will be many of my supporters on the route for the first three stages because Slovakia is very close to Hungary.
“But we will also enjoy the stages on the Italian roads, as I lived and used to train in Italy. It’s a nice Giro route; the first part suits me best but I will try to stay until the end in Milan.”
Add new comment
31 comments
I think it might come from the infantile school of motoring, encouraged by top gear/clarkeson idiocy, where the answer to anything seems to be POWER!.
I don't know when it became the default to just keep going, or even to speed up when a situation looks a bit tight. Nobody seems to just brake and wait a few seconds until the situation becomes safe anymore.
So Foookling dangerous. The vehicle only just made it passed the central island, the trailer mounted the island and fishtailed, so close to the rider. That is dangerous driving without a doubt.
A complaint at the police chief for what amounts to slap on the wrist. That one deserves a short custodial sentence
TBH, Ive held a driving license for over 25 years. I know I have had close calls through my own fault and others in that time. The highway code has probably had multiple changes but even if it hadn't, I couldnt remember most of it. My dad got his license driving trucks in the National Service in the late 40's / early 50's and never had to take a retest. I think most current drivers agree that with the bad habits they pick up driving, they would fail the practical test.
After seeing the videos like above, and experiencing first hand on the bike in the last few years, I have come to the conclusion that refresher tests should be mandatory every 10 years and if you fail, you lose your license until you retake and pass. Fork lift truck drivers have to do this but driving a 20 ton HGV or a 2 ton Chelsea Tractor is ok, the former only requiring regular medicals after 45 and the latter not even requiring that until you are 80.
Couldn't agree more.
Given that you now have to renew your photocard licence every ten years anyway, there is no good reason not to make passing a competence test part of the renewal process.
I love the fact that they decided a Driver Awareness Course because of his previous clean record. Are they really stating he is such a law abiding citizen and this is a one off case they would never have expected? It was only through pure luck that the box didnt send the rider to his grave, but I'm sure then it might have been upgraded to points on the license as he has such a clean driving record normally.
No first-time burglar is a burglar until they've first burgled.
So clearly, we should send all first-time burglars on a Property Awareness Course...
On the speeding moron, didn't a roadcc member have his offer of working out the speeding claim using the same methodology as used above rejected by police?
Bournemouth is the place to ride
https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/17990024.mcdonalds-milkshake-thro...
Lots of comments from people with no grasp of physics.
Horsebox pass - so close, so dangerous; worst I've seen. Pathetic slap on wrist.
These days I take matters into my own hands... and take the lane through pinch points; looking back in advance, indicating if needed to reinforce the manoeuvre.
So... dangerous driving round cyclists and someone else posts it on youtube... driver awareness course.
Post your own video on youtube of you driving fast... 6 points and a fine + costs.
Next time, to avoid inconvenience and expense Joe Achilles should get cyclists to post videos of him zooming past them.
Looks like the horsebox actually hit the centre island - the offside wheel seems airborne. So yes, the RSPCA should be interested. So should the BHS.
Horse owners are the first to get uppity if you baulk them driving their horsebox with its precious charge inside. Rightly so, it's not the horse's fault. God fobid you do it whilst they are actually riding their steed. How much brain can it take to see that cyclists are likewise vulberable road users?
It's a shocker alright, the horsebox did hit the centre island curb, but no horses inside box. This was a club member of mine whilst out with another club, he was pretty shook up from it. I'm glad he captured this on camera. Without that footage, there'd have been no repercussions whatsoever it seems.
Standard driving from horsebox driver. The absolute worst drivers round here. Don't say hello to a horse rider though and you're scum
The horsebox incident, with possibly the most dangerous close pass ever, with the driver receiving the totally disproportionate sentence of a driver improvement course, makes me wonder exactly who they know in the West Mercia police. In any sane society, that driver wouldn't be driving for the next five years.
Never mind, the government's review of road laws, which started in 2014, is sure to bring sense.
FTFY.
You're right, thanks.
Glad to help. I'd presumed it was a typo.
Holy Shitballs, that close pass by a vehicle towing a trailer and you get a "Driver Improvement course".
West Mercia Police need to rethink publishing that as a good thing. FFS the driver hit the pedestrian crossing with the trailer and almost lost control of their vehicle as a result of the MGIF attitude.
I am just wondering whether or not the RSPCA might want to be looking at whether or not that particular person should be allowed to keep horses (or whatever large animals) would most likely have been in that trailer.
That should have been as a minimum a conviction for dangerous driving. That could so easily have ended with the death of the cyclist. If that trailer instead of bouncing over the traffic island, had skipped sideways it would have caused catastrophic injuries to the cyclist. But hey the cyclist only got a little fright so we can't do anything more than give a slap on the wrist to the driver.
Holy horsebox! On the West Mercia Police video, I've said this before but:- that moment when you think "that was close", and then realise there's a trailer coming too... That one is absolutely terrifying
Don't overlook the lovely and totally safe way that the horsebox was actually bouncing
I'm amazed (but sadly not surprised) at the number of people who seem to think it's OK to drive at 90+ along that road which has a limit of 50.
“For a man who drives for a profession I am appalled that he seemingly has so little value for the lives of other road users,” said Sergeant Adam Shipley.
Has Adam ever come across taxi drivers, bus drivers, lorry drivers...?
That r8 did sound good though. If was up to such deeds and needed to put it on Youtube I'd pretend I was a US diplomat or relation of, as they can get away with anything.
The fact that he filmed this and posted it are significant aggravating factors. They show that he planned this in advance, and was proud of having done it. His purpose was to drive dangerously, and he is wedded to doing the same.
Given that I am surprised he was not banned from driving for a significant period.
Exactly; he showed intent, so this was not some accidental breaking of the limit, and the amount he broke it by is so huge, 86%, on a road he must have known to have a poor safety record, that he should have been banned for a considerable time and made to re-sit his driving test. By any measure, he is clearly not a fit person to hold a licence to operate lethal machinery in a public place.
But, you know, hardship, and driving is a right etc.
He's getting lots of support from petrolheads on twitter, but the most popular post is:
"The guy who hit me at 80 mph reckoned he was a great driver. I tell myself the same thing when I put my prosthetic legs on every morning."
Just to be clear, I don't disagree with either of you that the driving was idiotic and reprehensible. However, it seems he was charged with speeding, not with careless or dangerous driving. Premeditation is not (legally speaking) an aggravating factor for that offence - there's just a simple scale for how much you broke the limit by. The sentence is a fine and either disqualification for somewhere in the range 7 - 56 days, or given 6 points, but not both. He got the latter. I would guess he was charged with speeding as it's the easier offence, it may have been difficult to demonstrate any aspect of the driving other than the speed that was dangerous, and a careless or dangerous charge could have gone before a sympathetic jury, whereas speeding is magistrate only.
They're not petrolheads, they're wankers. Proper petrolheads save those speeds for the track, not the roads.
Don't confuse genuine petrolheads with the status-obsessed wankers who tear around at antisocial speeds and care more about their infotainment systems than they do about their standard of driving.
Doesn't surprise me.
Seems that spurious claims of "emergency powers" get made by "our" Government quite a lot nowadays...
Pages