Welcome to Friday’s live blog, with Jack Sexty, Alex Bowden and the rest of the team.
- News

Zwiftiverse gets bigger; Car-free London by 2030?; “Let’s have another Olympics…” Says Sir Chris Hoy (poss joking); Danny MacAskill overtake gets thumbs up from cops; Animal rights protester has bike crushed by lorry +more in today’s Live blog
SUMMARY

Danny MacAskill gets thumbs-up from Scotland's Road Policing team
#OpClosePass in Eddleston today:
10 #ChatontheMat
1 Insurance warning
5 Speed warnings2 drivers charged with Careless Driving for overtaking our cyclist far below safe standards.
Pics of excellent overtakes, including @danny_macaskill ‘s @DropandRollTour Van!#Rule163 pic.twitter.com/S1CxH8vxHw
— Road Policing Scotland (@polscotrpu) August 1, 2019
The mtb hero was praised for an ‘excellent overtake’, whereas numerous drivers during this latest Operation Close Pass weren’t so excellent with two charged for careless driving due to passing too close.
Shocking moment animal rights activist has bike crushed under lorry, narrowly escaping himself
The footage was captured by Claire Folan during a sit-in protest at Ramsgate port yesterday morning, with activists attempting to block a lorry carrying livestock. As a man on a bike appears about 14 seconds into the clip, the lorry ploughs through the bike with the man narrowly escaping being crushed himself.
Ms Folan told Kent Online: “I think the thought that went through my head was, ‘am I going to see someone die today?’
“I honestly believe it’s only a matter of time – someone will die at that port.”
She also said the two minute interceptions of livestock lorries are pre-arranged, but the police fail to step in when activists are put in danger by lorry drivers: “Having been previously down at the front with the lorries, trying to slow them and almost getting hit myself, I’ve more recently started standing back to film.
“I’m very glad I was in a position to show what happened today. The disregard for life extends to humans too with these ruthless exporters.”
The Away With Cars Report says London should be car-free by 2030, proposing a huge public transport service as an alternative


The report, from Common Wealth and backed by campaign groups We Own It and Greenpeace, says no Londoners should have private cars by 2030 and instead proposes a huge network of public transport services involving state-run electric cabs, e-bikes, auto-rickshaws, trams and e-scooters.
“Most Londoners won’t dare cycle because of a legitimate fear of being killed or maimed by a motor vehicle”, says the report, which forms the basis of the initiative to remove private cars from the roads. They envisage a utopia where the only cars on the roads are shared vehicle or private hire cabs that are both managed and regulated by TfL, ensuring drivers get fair pay and annual leave.
For cycling, you could hire e-bikes quickly and easily via your annual subscription, and all bikes will be much more accessible with far improved cycling infrastructure: “Dockless bikes are now ubiquitous, booked and unlocked with the TfL app. TfL planners ensure minimum comprehensive coverage across the city, and cycle hire is free to annual subscribers, pensioners and under 18s. Segregated cycle lanes are everywhere, even down to quiet residential streets, which are no longer crowded with parked cars.”
They go as far as to say life for professional drivers (now using electric vans of course) will be so much easier due to the little congestion that they will be on a shorter working week, and ambulance services will be less stretched because of the greatly reduced road casualties.
What do you think, could it actuall happen or is this all a bit too ambitious?
Zwift opens new virtual roads
Zwift has announced the addition of new roads on its virtual cycling platform.
“Titans Grove draws inspiration from the High Sierras [in California, USA], home to the world-famous Sequoia National Park,” says Zwift.


“Sitting adjacent to the Fuego Flats, the mammoth-sized boulders and giant sequoias cast a most welcome shadow for those arriving fresh from a trip through the desert.”
The new section of road features three gradual climbs.


“With a maximum gradient of 5%, these are climbs that will provide enough of a challenge to get the legs stinging, but still gentle enough that Zwifters can still sit back and enjoy the scenery,” says Zwift.
“Each lap features 158m [520ft] of elevation gain.”
"Let's have another Olympics, shall we?" - Chris Hoy's tongue-in-cheek solution to the nation's problems
Sir Chris Hoy is sad that the nation’s apparently so divided. “Let’s have another Olympics shall we?” he suggests.
The Scot is of course joking, but speaking to Motor Sport magazine he seems to be mourning the spirit of 2012.
“We were so united and there was such a feeling of ‘look what we can achieve and isn’t this great’. It was such a wonderful time, people were talking on the Tube and every morning I would wake up, open my curtains and see thousands of people flooding into the Olympic Park.
“It is sad when you think that in such a short space of time the country is so divided. You turn the news on and you think ‘Oh God, can it get any worse?’
“Let’s have another Olympic Games, shall we? That will sort it out.”
Anti-cycling Facebook pages part of propaganda network run by Boris Johnson ally
Weirdly, and initially somewhat confusingly, Lynton Crosby’s firm also ran the Square Mile Cycling group. This fake grassroots campaign aimed to have the Embankment Cycle Superhighway redirected throught the City of London.
Seems like it’s a Canary Wharf thing.
Doing RideLondon? Don't fancy the extra mileage to and from the start and finish?
Taking part in Prudential @RideLondon this weekend?
Non-folding bikes can be taken on certain Tube, DLR and Overground services during off peak hours
Folding bikes are welcome on all services at any time
Check out this map for details – https://t.co/srE46xCEiR
— Transport for London (@TfL) August 2, 2019
Fiona Kolbinger still leading TCR
Tanja Hacker is currently the number 2 woman in the race. Second to leading woman and overall race leader, Fiona Kolbinger. She’s now making her way through the climbs of the CP3 parcours.#TCRNo7 #TCRNo7riders #TCRNo7women #TCRNo7cap222 @PEdALEDjapan #LiveDressRide pic.twitter.com/YsK7k4vB5a
— The Transcontinental (@transconrace) August 2, 2019
Near Miss of the Day 293: Why wait when you’re driving the bigger vehicle?
Campaigners ask questions of Canary Wharf Group
Following on from this morning’s report on the fake anti-cycling campaign groups seemingly run at the behest of Canary Wharf Group (CWG), London Cycling Campaign are asking a few questions of the property firm.
The group says: “While publicly maintaining a paper-thin pretence of support for cycling, CWG have over and over attacked cycling schemes and/or attempted to weaken them behind closed doors.
“CWG appear to be the landowner responsible for putting in a ludicrous number of anti-cycling barriers where the National Cycle Network passes Canary Wharf.
“CWG also now oppose the Canary Wharf – Rotherhithe bridge crossing, as detailed in their submission to The London Plan’s examination in public, calling it ‘very expensive and environmentally intrusive’.”
Chris Froome's "road to recovery"
Tomorrow Team Ineos are going to bring you the story of one man who had a horrible crash, who then cycled with one leg for a bit until he was well enough to cycle with two legs. (We’re guessing there’ll probably a bit about the psychological impact too.)
“I’d like to share with people just what I’ve been through during the last few weeks.”
Chris Froome: My Road to Recovery – launching tomorrow pic.twitter.com/ytLEYRuMfO
— Team INEOS (@TeamINEOS) August 2, 2019
Bedford cycling ban extended for another three years
Controversial PSPO is being enforced ever more vigorously by private contractor.
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
21 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
"All that's required is an to roads policing" - that's a big all... Although no doubt the "idiots just keep coming" aspect does apply: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz9lel2wz93o "Man charged after car crashes through bowling alley" - luckily they only skittled over skittles.
Almost any change to roads and streets is accompanied by a period of heightened danger, and in the UK "look out for cyclists" will need to be learned... practically. And over the time it takes for cyclists to become a regular feature. OTOH once (if...) good designs are in and frequent enough such that drivers encounter them AND the cyclists on them regularly (another big if) I don't think they should be much more difficult than a footway to deal with. These things are all over NL - don't have the collision stats but they should. (NL isn't perfect but collecting info on the safety of designs to feed back into better designs as required is part of the "sustainable safety" philosophy - if they're really a killer I think they'd be altering these.)
I'm in the happy position of agreeing with everybody here! I've never considered a bike with a stand, yet I'm impressed by the ingenuity and adaptability of this axle. I tow a Yak Bob with a Robert Axle, employing my El Cheapo Vitus gravel bike and I just have to be very careful where I stop. Hedges are generally a dead loss, and I seek walls, telegraph poles and signposts and generally lean the widest part of the Bob against it. One very awkward task is removing the two steel pins which lock the trailer arms onto the special mounting slots on the Robert axle, and when you have one out, the sodding weight in the trailer can twist the whole caboodle and bend the Bob fitting before you can get the other out and unhitch. I doubt if a stand would help with that. You can imagine that this combo is a real pain when you have to get it over the bridge at railway stations, and it nearly resulted in Merseyrail nearly parting me and the trailer on the platform from the bike on the train. It's a long story for another time. Another axle example recently featured on here, with a 12mm front axle bearing the Herculean weight limit of a monster American front rack.
This has nothing to do with the type of bike - it's the type of behaviour that's the problem. Banning the sale of such bikes will not curtail the behaviour. They'll just find another type of vehicle and continue to drive dangerously as there's such a lack of enforcement. I'd sooner see them ban the bally. But really, all that's required is an improvement to roads policing.
The EAPC Bill is welcome, but full of holes. What's to stop an overpowered but temporarily limited e-bike being sold and subsequently delimited? This is often a trivial process.
@KiwiMike Yeah, in my over four decades of riding all over Europe I've never 'been for a ride in the countryside'. That must be it. Or, and I know this is a wild concept, you just accept that I just voiced my personal experiences and never missed a kickstand, like I wrote. Anyway, what's the big horror of laying your bike on its side for the very few occasions where there is nothing to lean your bike against?
They may have looked, but did they see?
Ds2025: where they are going wrong is that they are crushing the motorbike rather than the person sat on top of it. If they did the latter this issue would be solved in less than 24 hours.
I came this way today with the car boot sale in operation. There was a marshal at the entrance, who stopped a car turning right across the cycleway as I was approaching. So that certainly works. I think it necessary for the marshal to be there, I couldn't say if the driver would have turned if he hadn't been there but you always have to suspect the worst. Unfortunately there is no marshal at the exit, and there was certainly a car stopped across the cycleway as I was approaching it. But he pulled onto the road before I reached it, and the following car stayed off the cycleway as I went through. Ideally there should have been a marshal there too. On the whole, though, it's a really high standard piece of infrastructure. Just a pity it doesn't extend a bit further.
“absolute carnage” So right! Just look at the bodies piled up, blood running in the gutters and injured people limping away. It's a bit of a problem with a road, delaying some people for minutes at a time: it isn't carnage, let alone 'absolute carnage'. Anyone who exaggerates so ridiculously really shouldn't be allowed to comment in public, unless they want to demonstrate their idiocy to all and sundry.
21 thoughts on “Zwiftiverse gets bigger; Car-free London by 2030?; “Let’s have another Olympics…” Says Sir Chris Hoy (poss joking); Danny MacAskill overtake gets thumbs up from cops; Animal rights protester has bike crushed by lorry +more in today’s Live blog”
I suspect a lot of people
I suspect a lot of people still would prefer to use their cars even if there was an abaolutely amazing public transport system.
It might work in London, but London still has a central body which (in theory) runs and controls and coordinates all of their public transport.
The rest of the country has a chaotic (in theory – the majority are First or Stagecoach) set of transport companies which compete against each other, to the point of (allegedly!) swamping rivals’ routes to kill them off and then rowing back.
Quote:
…might have been better (?) if the video actually showed said shocking moment, rather than just before then panning it out of shot and then just after.
brooksby wrote:
Which video were you watching? I saw it.
numbskull wrote:
I stand corrected: I think I blinked at the wrong moment…
But it leads me onto another point. We’re constantly being told about how huge the blind spots are around a HGV (the size of Wales, wasn’t it?).
There are all these protesters milling about next to and in the road (and Mr Brompton rides out right into a known blind spot, but I’m not going there).
In the interests of safety and, y’know, not killing anybody, I appreciate it might have been seen as giving in but couldn’t the HGV driver have just STOPPED? (“Sorry, mate, I can’t safely proceed”)
Protesting is one thing.
Protesting is one thing. Purposely puuting yourself in harms way to obstruct someone’s business and lawful activity is another.
numbskull wrote:
Utter garbage. The entire point of direct action is to cause a stink and obstruct what you’re protesting against, you will achieve nothing by meekly standing on the side.
‘Car-free London by 2030?’
‘Car-free London by 2030?’
Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!
Let’s give the lorry driver a
Let’s give the lorry driver a break on this one; both the cyclist and the driver were victims of the lunacy happening on the road at that time. No one was hurt, no one wanted anyone hurt, (except maybe the protesters) the dutch lorry driver is almost certainly going to be very experienced around cyclists. Protest, but lets not create danger while doing it
alexuk wrote:
The dutch lorry driver probably couldn’t believe there wasn’t safe, segregated, joined up infrastructure for protesters like at home
quiff wrote:
Given the overall standard of Dutch driving he probably didn’t give a fuck either way, all this bullshit about Dutch drivers being great is precisely that, they manage to kill 60 cyclists where segregated infra meets a road so they aren’t all that and another 140+ cyclists die elsewhere despite all the segregation.
The sooner we get direct
The sooner we get direct vision cabs on our lorries the better.
What a fucking idiot . I have
What a fucking idiot . I have no sympathy whatsoever. The lorry driver does not even no he’s there. That’s how most cyclists get killed in London ,up the inside of a lorry .
protest ,great . I’m all for it , it’s a way to get your message across . But FFS getting your self killed by being a fucking idiot . It’s his own fault . Like bill hicks said about taking LSD .if you think you can fly ,then take off from the fucking ground ,don’t jump off a building . Your a moron ,one less s moron who’s a fucking disappointment to his parents .
Been following Wout van Aert
Been following Wout van Aert’s recovery – possibility of a minor Franco-Belgian skirmish in the offing – Wout claiming the surgeon in Pau bodged the job and left him at risk of never making a full recovery. Second surgery in Belgium has corrected the issue, he’s now at the stage where he can’t walk more than a few steps but should make a full recovery.
“I honestly believe it’s only
“I honestly believe it’s only a matter of time – someone will die at that port.”
Well stop riding into the blind spot of lorries on purpose then you dopes. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
“CWG also now oppose the
“CWG also now oppose the Canary Wharf – Rotherhithe bridge…, calling it ‘very expensive and environmentally intrusive’.”
So not a bit like Canary Wharf then?
If I was the lorry driver and
If I was the lorry driver and was confronted with all those protesters on the road in front of me, I’d have stopped and not continued driving at them.
Brompton cycles straight into
Brompton cycles straight into the drivers blind spot: Having taken part in a swap places scheme last week, where a 6’5” copper walked into that very spot whilst I was in the cab, I can attest that the driver couldn’t possibly have seen him. I can only assume the cyclist was unaware of this blind spot. The driver must have felt threatened with all the protesters, so lets give him a break here.
Crusty wrote:
If a truck has such pisspoor visibilty that you can’t see a 6’5″ copper standing near it, then why the fuck is it ever allowed to be on the road?
Rakkor wrote:
This is the question we should be asking every time someone is killed or injured in a ‘blind spot’.
The technology exists to eradicate blind spots, vehicles that you cannot drive safely should not be allowed on the roads.
If the industry hadn’t been
If the industry hadn’t been so resistant to change (I’m thinking the FTA, of course, and manufactures like Volvo, with their LifePaint for the potential victims rather than their deadly vehicles for the killers) then we would have a lot more of the far safer direct vision cabs out there by now.
I’m not sure why they’re
I’m not sure why they’re bothering with this protest right now.
In a few months time after a no-deal Brexit, we won’t be signed up to single market rules, so animal exports won’t be allowed anyway.
All the livestock farmers will go bankrupt, especially once cheap imports from the US start coming in.
All the countryside that doesn’t get built on or used as a Donald Trump golf course can be rewilded and filled with wolves, bears, lynxes and mountain lions.