Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

West London priest who asked parishioners to pray against Cycle Superhighway is converted after plans tweaked

Father Michael Dunne says changes prove that "consultation brings changes which benefit the community"...

A Roman Catholic priest at a church in Chiswick that opposed plans for a Cycle Superhighway has been converted to the idea after a redesign of the part of the route in question by Transport for London (TfL).

When the route was under consultation in 2017 parishioners at Our Lady of Grace and St Edward’s Church on Chiswick High Road were encouraged to pray “for success in turning CS9 away from the High Road and the church.”

> West London church urges parishioners to pray against Cycle Superhighway

On its website, the parish claimed that the “the pavement outside of the church will be reduced to about one third of its current size and the Cycle Superhighway would have right of way.”

The original layout is shown in the artist’s impression above, with trees to the right obscuring the red-brick church building.

Outlining the revised proposals today as it confirmed that construction of the route from Kensington Olympia to Brentford will start later this year, TfL said:

Along Chiswick High Road, the existing space for pedestrians on Duke’s Avenue outside Our Lady of Grace and St Edward Church has been retained, whilst maintaining the proposed benefits for cyclists and the fully segregated cycle track, by removing the right turn lane into Duke’s Avenue. Banning the right turn for vehicles will also reduce the likelihood of collisions at this junction.

Parish priest Father Michael Dunne, quoted in TfL’s press release, praised planners for taking some of his concerns on board.

He said: “I can now endorse the TfL consultation process. TfL has listened to the church community and in their revising proposals for the cycle route made very significant changes conscientiously and adequately addressing concerns both for the safety of church-goers and other pedestrians and the impeding of the practice of the faith. 

“If the cycle lane cannot be re-routed away from Chiswick High Road altogether, TfL has proved to me that engaging in the consultation brings changes which benefit the community,” he added.

A new consultation is now open on the section of the route in question, as well as on fresh plans to make the junction at the northern end of Kew Bridge safer for cyclists (pictured below).

CS9 Kew Bridge revised proposals

Eventually, it is planned for the 7-kilometre route to be extended westwards towards Hounslow.

At the eastern end, it will terminate at Hammersmith & Fulham’s border with Kensington & Chelsea, which is opposed to the idea of having a segregated cycle lanes along Kensington High Street.

That means that after passing Kensington Olympia, cyclists heading into the city centre will have to join the main carriageway for a couple of kilometres before picking up CS3 just past the Royal Albert Hall.

London’s cycling and walking commissioner, Will Norman, said: “I’m delighted that construction on this high-quality route will start later this year. We know there is a high demand for cycling in the area and these plans will make it safer and easier, opening it up to even more budding riders.

“I’m really pleased that the improved plans will deliver further improvements for walking and cycling, helping to reduce car use which is crucial to cleaning up London’s toxic air.”

Michael Robinson, co-ordinator of the Hounslow Cycling Campaign, said: “We welcome the new plans for this vital cycle route and are pleased that TfL has listened to local responses.

“The changes will help link the town centres of Chiswick and Brentford and rebalance their high streets away from motor vehicle traffic in favour of people walking and cycling. This will enhance the environment and improve safety for all.”  

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

8 comments

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 5 years ago
1 like

He had originally claimed that cycle lanes posed a greater threat to London than the Blitz did he not?

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 5 years ago
2 likes

Perhaps he could pray for George Osborne's soul? Then again...

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Dnnnnnn | 5 years ago
2 likes

Duncann wrote:

Perhaps he could pray for George Osborne's soul? Then again...

That it be found?

Avatar
zanf replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
1 like

OldRidgeback wrote:

He had originally claimed that cycle lanes posed a greater threat to London than the Blitz did he not?

That was Nigel Lawson

burtthebike wrote:
Duncann wrote:

Perhaps he could pray for George Osborne's soul? Then again...

That it be found?

....under that big pile of cocaine.

//i.imgur.com/bToJSgo.gif)

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
2 likes

"He said: “I can now endorse the TfL consultation process. TfL has listened to the church community and in their revising proposals for the cycle route made very significant changes conscientiously and adequately addressing concerns both for the safety of church-goers and other pedestrians and the impeding of the practice of the faith."

Or, to put it another way, he got such a kicking for misusing his position that he's recanted.  I'm sure his god had a word in his ear.  I wonder if he ever prayed for the victims of car crime?

As Dave Allen used to say "Goodnight and may your god go with you."

Avatar
alansmurphy replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
0 likes

blah blah blah wrote:

by removing the right turn lane into Duke’s Avenue. Banning the right turn for vehicles will also reduce the likelihood of collisions at this junction.

 

So why did the original design not seek to reduce collisions?

Avatar
peted76 | 5 years ago
0 likes

'Hallelujah!'

Avatar
muppetkeeper | 5 years ago
3 likes

"No representation without taxation" would have been my response to his holiness.

Latest Comments