Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Armstrong says media is being 'harsh' on Froome but accepts some responsibility for perception of the sport

“You would have thought Froome had a gallon of EPO for breakfast and that is not accurate”

Lance Armstrong says that the news of Chris Froome’s adverse analytical finding for Salbutamol is not being accurately reported by many media outlets, but accepts that he himself must take much of the blame for that.

Froome had twice the permitted limit of the anti-asthma drug when tested at the Vuelta a Espana in September. The drug is not banned outright, so if he can somehow prove he kept to the permitted dosage, he will avoid a ban and being stripped of his victory in that race.

A number of reports on the matter have of course lacked nuance and Independent.ie reports that while speaking on his podcast, Armstrong accepted responsibility for shaping the current perception of cycling.

"I am trying to accept some responsibility here because I have tainted the whole equation,” he said. “I read a story in the New York Times that was so harsh on Froome and the sport. You don't get an accurate depiction of this situation by reading that.

"This is so easy for the press to go after cycling and some of the bullshit I have read on this story has been so harsh. Reading that New York Times story, you would have thought Froome had a gallon of EPO for breakfast and that is not accurate and not fair to him."

He described cycling as “the sporting world's doormat” and concluded: “I have to take a lot of blame for that."

Armstrong then went on to suggest that the reaction to Froome’s test result was why it should have remained secret.

"He should be allowed due process to explain what happened here and he could be completely exonerated, but he is tarnished forever. Damage is done.

"This investigation could go on for months. Come next July, riding around France, it's going to be a nightmare.

"I don't know why this has been leaked to the media. Whoever leaked this had to remain anonymous and this happens a lot in our sport. It's frustrating."

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

21 comments

Avatar
Thelma Viaduct | 6 years ago
1 like

Lance Armstrong is a good bloke really. He had no real choice bitd. Having honesty and integrity gets you nowhere in the real world, can't blame him suckering in other corporate cnuts to carve out a great life for himself and his family. Many have benefited from his cancer charity too. Pissing off skinny lycra clad roadies along the way and after was a price worth paying. You can guarantee he has done more to benefit people than any of his jealous detractors. Jury still out on Froome.

Avatar
nniff | 6 years ago
1 like

As a regular consumer of Salbutamol during the hay fever months (end of Feb to September) I have two settings -'can breathe' and 'can't breathe'.  The switch is controlled by Salbutamol.  Sometimes there is a third setting, which is 'can't breathe and coughing'.   The 'can breathe' setting is the same as the out of hay fever season normal settting.  There is no upside, just an approximation to normal.

Performance enhancing?  Hardly.  Restoring?  Maybe. 

Avatar
OnTheRopes replied to nniff | 6 years ago
2 likes

nniff wrote:

Performance enhancing?  Hardly.  Restoring?  Maybe. 

Yes when used via an inhaler that is correct but if topped up by another means it is suggested that it can be performance enhancing. 

So there is the possibility that Froome only used and inhaler and that something like dehydration caused this which is entirely possible, in which case Froome or Sky need to prove this was the case. Something that will be very difficult to do.

 

As LA says (correctly in my opinion) this should not have been leaked to the press at this stage as he is now Damned whichever way it goes

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 6 years ago
0 likes

Has he shown enough remorse to have a respected opinion?

Avatar
beezus fufoon | 6 years ago
1 like

I had no idea that EPO is sold by the gallon

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will | 6 years ago
4 likes

His points are fair though. 

Avatar
DaveE128 | 6 years ago
7 likes

I never thought I'd say this, but I actually think Lance Armstrong is making sense here!

And he is actually accepting some responsibility for his actions.

Are we sure someone hasn't hacked his podcast account? 

Avatar
stenmeister | 6 years ago
3 likes

Is Lance admitting he actually had a gallon on EPO for breakfast then?

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to stenmeister | 6 years ago
3 likes

stenmeister wrote:

Is Lance admitting he actually had a gallon on EPO for breakfast then?

American or European gallon?

Avatar
andyp | 6 years ago
3 likes

Who better to go to for a character reference.

Avatar
crazy-legs replied to andyp | 6 years ago
11 likes

andyp wrote:

Who better to go to for a character reference.

I know you were being sarcastic but actually, you're right - the people who have done wrong and who know how to beat the system are actually very good at seeign all sides of the story.

road.cc themselves have run articles by former, reformed bike thieves saying how to stop your bike being stolen, what they'd look for in a bike left locked up (weak locks, unlit areas etc) even down to the type of locks they'd find easy to break.

David Millar is a good example of someone who could now use his ban, his stripped title etc to warn others - he's said about the support networks that simply weren't in place when he was a young rider and the peer pressure from team managers, other riders...

Lance has been there, done it, knows how to cheat the drug tests, knows how the media vultures work so actually he's probably far more qualified to talk than most on the subject! whether or not anyone likes him, repsects his opinion, wants to listen to him of course is another matter...

Avatar
andyp replied to crazy-legs | 6 years ago
0 likes

crazy-legs wrote:

andyp wrote:

Who better to go to for a character reference.

I know you were being sarcastic but actually, you're right - the people who have done wrong and who know how to beat the system are actually very good at seeign all sides of the story.

road.cc themselves have run articles by former, reformed bike thieves saying how to stop your bike being stolen, what they'd look for in a bike left locked up (weak locks, unlit areas etc) even down to the type of locks they'd find easy to break.

David Millar is a good example of someone who could now use his ban, his stripped title etc to warn others - he's said about the support networks that simply weren't in place when he was a young rider and the peer pressure from team managers, other riders...

Lance has been there, done it, knows how to cheat the drug tests, knows how the media vultures work so actually he's probably far more qualified to talk than most on the subject! whether or not anyone likes him, repsects his opinion, wants to listen to him of course is another matter...

 

Agree entirely.Armstrong well placed to talk to about both the doping and the complete cockweasel aspects of Froome. And they probably joined forces to nick Simeone's bike too.

 

Avatar
STiG911 | 6 years ago
16 likes

He makes a fair point; The story leaks and all of a sudden people are experts on Cycling, UCI rules and Asthma all at once. As per usual, no one looks beyond the headlines at the details, they just see drugs and assume cheat.

Avatar
davel replied to STiG911 | 6 years ago
5 likes

STiG911 wrote:

He makes a fair point; The story leaks and all of a sudden people are experts on Cycling, UCI rules and Asthma all at once. As per usual, no one looks beyond the headlines at the details, they just see drugs and assume cheat.

Roughly half do.

The other roughly half see 'Froome' and/or 'Sky' and see the lack of photographic evidence of him giving himself a transfusion as cast iron proof of his innocence.

Both sides then eat google in order to appear dead clever and win internet rows.

The other roughly half are actually dead clever, like me, and don't give roughly half a shit either way.

Avatar
grahamTDF replied to davel | 6 years ago
5 likes

davel wrote:

STiG911 wrote:

He makes a fair point; The story leaks and all of a sudden people are experts on Cycling, UCI rules and Asthma all at once. As per usual, no one looks beyond the headlines at the details, they just see drugs and assume cheat.

Roughly half do.

The other roughly half see 'Froome' and/or 'Sky' and see the lack of photographic evidence of him giving himself a transfusion as cast iron proof of his innocence.

Both sides then eat google in order to appear dead clever and win internet rows.

The other roughly half are actually dead clever, like me, and don't give roughly half a shit either way.

Think I'm in the 4th half who are just trying to understand it.

Tis the old complicated truth vs simple lie problem.

Avatar
DaveE128 replied to grahamTDF | 6 years ago
2 likes

grahamTDF wrote:

davel wrote:

Roughly half do.

The other roughly half <snip>

The other roughly half are actually dead clever, like me, <snip>

Think I'm in the 4th half who are just trying to understand it.

Avatar
Beecho replied to davel | 6 years ago
3 likes

davel wrote:

Both sides then eat google in order to appear dead clever and win internet rows.

[/quote]

I feel the need for some form of annotation from them. A chart or two perhaps?

Avatar
davel replied to Beecho | 6 years ago
1 like
Beecho wrote:

davel wrote:

Both sides then eat google in order to appear dead clever and win internet rows.

I feel the need for some form of annotation from them. A chart or two perhaps?

[/quote]

Exactly a chart or two... One Lance, other one Froomey... Incomparable axes... C'mere Google...

Avatar
john1967 replied to davel | 6 years ago
1 like

davel wrote:

STiG911 wrote:

He makes a fair point; The story leaks and all of a sudden people are experts on Cycling, UCI rules and Asthma all at once. As per usual, no one looks beyond the headlines at the details, they just see drugs and assume cheat.

Roughly half do.

The other roughly half see 'Froome' and/or 'Sky' and see the lack of photographic evidence of him giving himself a transfusion as cast iron proof of his innocence.

Both sides then eat google in order to appear dead clever and win internet rows.

The other roughly half are actually dead clever, like me, and don't give roughly half a shit either way.

 

Its best to say nout when you dont give a shit because then it actually looks like you dont give a shit.

Avatar
davel replied to john1967 | 6 years ago
0 likes
john1967 wrote:

davel wrote:

STiG911 wrote:

He makes a fair point; The story leaks and all of a sudden people are experts on Cycling, UCI rules and Asthma all at once. As per usual, no one looks beyond the headlines at the details, they just see drugs and assume cheat.

Roughly half do.

The other roughly half see 'Froome' and/or 'Sky' and see the lack of photographic evidence of him giving himself a transfusion as cast iron proof of his innocence.

Both sides then eat google in order to appear dead clever and win internet rows.

The other roughly half are actually dead clever, like me, and don't give roughly half a shit either way.

 

Its best to say nout when you dont give a shit because then it actually looks like you dont give a shit.

...

Avatar
MonkeyPuzzle | 6 years ago
9 likes

Just the man he wanted rushing to his aid.

Latest Comments