A Warwickshire driver who killed a cyclist after hitting him head-on while rushing to work in February last year has been jailed for four-and-a-half years. George Hacker overslept after going out drinking the night before, staying up for three whiskies and a line of cocaine after he got home.
The Stratford Observer reports that Hacker was due in work at 8am but didn’t leave home until 9.45am.
Driving along the B4452 Ufton Road near Harbury, just after 10am, he drifted onto the opposite side of the road and hit 35-year-old Simon Worthington who was training for a triathlon.
Worthington, whose wife was expecting their second child at the time, died at the scene.
Hacker was on his phone via Bluetooth and later said he had been distracted by seeing a vehicle in a field which seemed to have been in an accident.
Coventry Crown Court heard that Hacker continued on the wrong side of the road for another 70 to 80 yards. A woman driving in the opposite direction feared he would hit her too.
Hacker was arrested and was found to have been in possession of a small amount of cocaine.
He admitted causing Worthington’s death by dangerous driving.
As well as the four-and-a-half year sentence, Deputy Judge Richard Griffith-Jones also gave him a concurrent three-month sentence for possessing cocaine and banned him from driving for six years and three months.
17 thoughts on “Jail for driver who had been on night out and killed cyclist as he rushed to work the next day”
RIP
RIP
This is a ‘full house’ of bad driving – rushing, on a phone, drifting into the opposite lane, driving after a drink and drug bender. Yet the driver has his license suspended for just over six years. What do you have to do to get a 10 or 15 year suspension?
I recall seeing a study of punishments for driving offences published by, I think, Roadpeace. For the study period, which was several years, there were no license suspensions of more than 10 years,
the little onion wrote:
I posted this link on an earlier thread . Unless things have changed dramatically in the last 5 years, it seems its essentially _impossible_ to get the maximum sentence. Never happens.
(Maybe if someone drives into the Queen while doing 100mph in a 30mph zone, on the wrong side of the road while off their heads on smack, driving while disqualified, with no insurance, while shouting ‘allahu akbar’, and then denying all charges, they might get somewhere close to 14 years?)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9636991/Third-of-drivers-who-kill-and-maim-avoid-jail.html
FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:
RIP
This is a ‘full house’ of bad driving – rushing, on a phone, drifting into the opposite lane, driving after a drink and drug bender. Yet the driver has his license suspended for just over six years. What do you have to do to get a 10 or 15 year suspension?
I recall seeing a study of punishments for driving offences published by, I think, Roadpeace. For the study period, which was several years, there were no license suspensions of more than 10 years,
— FluffyKittenofTindalos I posted this link on an earlier thread . Unless things have changed dramatically in the last 5 years, it seems its essentially _impossible_ to get the maximum sentence. Never happens. (Maybe if someone drives into the Queen while doing 100mph in a 30mph zone, on the wrong side of the road while off their heads on smack, driving while disqualified, with no insurance, while shouting ‘allahu akbar’, and then denying all charges, they might get somewhere close to 14 years?) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9636991/Third-of-drivers-who-kill-and-maim-avoid-jail.html— the little onion
I think that the “while shouting ‘alluhu akabar'” bit is enough to get the offender convincingly shot…….
FFS… this is a clear case
FFS… this is a clear case where there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances so the maximum sentence for all charges the guy has been convicted of should apply.
There is no reason either as to why this guy should ever be licenced to drive again.
zanf wrote:
He pleaded guilty which usually yields a 50% discount (hey, kill one, get one free) but not clear what else reduced his sentence as on that basis it should have been 6 or 7 years.
We need life bans as a deterrent, plus a technical means of enforcing that.
…and why on earth to people
…and why on earth to people get to server sentences concurrently?! Unless they are consecutive, what the hell’s the point?!
Well that’s a version of
Well that’s a version of “whisky and coke” that I was not expecting
Never mind a 15 year
Never mind a 15 year suspension. What do you have to do to be told you will never drive again? And how big a cult do you need to be ever to want to drive again after doing this?
Notice he was on his phone. One day our legal system will learn that hands free does not equal safe and ban the damn things properly, and enforceably.
Call me a soppy old git but
Call me a soppy old git but the sentence about his wife expecting their second child made me well up.
Oh, and on the sentencing:
Given the nature of the crime here, it’s hard to work out how he only got four and a half years. Mind you, there doesn’t seem to be any evidence that he had alcohol or cocaine still in his system, so if he was under the legal limit he couldn’t have years added for driving whilst under the influence.
I feel sorry for the wife and
I feel sorry for the wife and children, having a killer for a dad/husband, they are fortunate however that they will still have him around in a couple of years, his victims family has no such benefit.
They are deprived of the life of someone in the prime of their life, deprived because a selfish piece of shite made deliberate choices, he chose to be on his phone, he chose to be a drug user, he is fully accountable for his driving standard, one that he chooses to drive at, all deliberate choices. he absolutely got off very, very lightly (as do most motorists), this should have being a manslughter case, not DD.
The sentence is an insult to the family of Simon Worthington and yet again shows you what a shower of shit our so called justice system is.
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:
nice of you to invent a family for the guilty bloke
beezus fufoon wrote:
My mistake, I thought it was the guilty party who had wife and kids, he still has/had a GF he was living with.
50% for pleading guilty is
50% for pleading guilty is bollocks too, caught in the act, no denial opportunity surely…
alansmurphy wrote:
Wish they’d reconsider that. It’s very close to the awful US practice of plea bargaining – replacing justice with a game of chicken, where the obviously guilty get a nice way to ‘game’ the system, while the possibly innocent get punished for not giving in to threats.
I was expecting to see a
I was expecting to see a hundred previous convictions and an orchestrated media campaign against the driver in order to get a jail conviction …. Still not enough justice for the severity of the crime and still hardly enough of a deterrent – throw the book at these kind of feckwits who willfully recklessly and knowingly take the lives of others into their hands.
I’m just glad to see he got
I’m just glad to see he got jail, compare and contrast with Gail Purcell…
FatBoyW wrote:
Or the killer Dr Helen Measures.