The chair of Cycling UK in Scotland says he sees nothing wrong with cyclists wearing headphones, after summarising the arguments for and against in a blog post for the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Professor Chris Oliver of the Physical Activity for Health Research Centre at the University of Edinburgh and a consultant trauma orthopaedic hand surgeon at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, said however that further research is needed before “strong conclusions” could be reached.
“Whilst banning wearing headphones whilst cycling may seem obvious for safety reasons, this behaviour restriction could be unfounded,” he wrote, noting that wearing headphones while riding a bike on the road or cycle paths is not currently illegal in the United Kingdom.
“One would think that listening to music may distract you from your surroundings. It may also prevent you from hearing other vehicles approach and thus jeopardise your own safety,” he continued.
He noted that “despite the common perspective that a greater ability to hear external sounds is safer and therefore better cycling practice, credible scientific evidence” on the issue “is very limited,”
Some people who ride with headphones do so with them only in one ear. A Dutch study that Professor Oliver cited, with 25 subjects, used auditory beeps to alert riders to a hazard while listening to music.
With headphones on both ears, only two thirds of riders (68 per cent) heard it, but with the headphone in just one ear, all subjects heard it.
Professor Oliver noted: “The researchers also found negative effects of high volume and fast tempo on auditory perception.
“The problem with this study is that no consideration was given to any visual warnings. Generally cyclists will use both visual and auditory information to stay safe.
“Stop signals are not auditory. There are red lights, white lines, and so on. All visual.
“Unfortunately there is really little evidence about how cycling with headphones affects concentration.”
In his post, he also addressed one issue often raised by cyclists who say riding with headphones should not be banned – that it is perfectly legal for hearing impaired and deaf people to ride a bike – and that motorists often listen to music through in-car stereo systems.
“Logically, if one was to argue that loss of concentration through listening to music or speech was in itself sufficient reason to prohibit cycling with headphones, one would also have to argue that car stereos would have to be banned,” he wrote, also raising the point that many pedestrians, too, listen to music on the move.
“Cycling and headphones causes much emotion and controversial debate, especially in the media,” he added, after highlighting a BBC poll in which nine respondents in ten agreed that cycling with headphones should be banned.
> Nine in ten people back headphone ban for cyclists, says BBC survey
Earlier this month, a coroner suggested that listening to music through her iPhone may have been a contributory factor in the death of cyclist Emily Norton, who sustained fatal injuries as she tried to avoid a lorry.
> Listening to music on iPhone may have led to cyclist’s death, says coroner
Professor Oliver concluded: “Victim blaming can be very upsetting in some accident situations. The facts of cycling accidents have to be absolutely established.
“Before anyone can come to any strong conclusions, we need further research to build up the evidence base on the use of headphones while cycling.”
The government has consistently rejected calls, including one in November 2013 from former Mayor of London Boris Johnson, for a headphone ban for cyclists.
> Government 'will not legislate' for Mayor of London's cyclist proposed headphone ban
Sounds like there are at least three of us here who are very local, and probably either know one another or have at least nodded at one another as...
Apparently he's a phd.... Or was it an aphid? Need to get to specsavers
Unite is my union, I joined the MSF, which became Amicus then Unite....
Surely stuff like this is easy pickings for the police? Video evidence of the driver putting people at risk means 100% chance of a successful...
Two words which should never follow in the same sentence. 'Gogglebox' and 'Star'.
I don't understand what is happening in these car park occurances. At least the other one wasn't blocking the large tree strewn cycle path.
Obviously, as Mayor, he'd just make cyclists pay Road Tax (even if they would be paying to not use the roads). Bosh - job done!
Looking forward to "how to blow up a tyre"
Be respectful man, if you're clueless, doesn't mean the rest of us are. I told you the source, if you were capable to read my post....
Only charge is likely to revolve around not wearing a seatbelt, won't be anything to do with protecting cyclists......