Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Mini Holland opponents boast of wasting taxpayers' money with legal challenge

E17 Streets For All say Waltham Forest's defence costs will reduce money available for cycling scheme...

Opponents of Waltham Forest’s Mini Holland scheme may have lost a High Court case last week – but they are claiming victory because they say the council’s legal costs incurred in its defence of the action will take money away from the project.

Last week, campaign group E17 Streets for All had its case thrown out of court, with Mr Justice Holgate finding that their complaints had “no merit whatsoever” and awarding costs of £12,000 against them – and they will also have to pay their own legal fees on top of that.

 – Opponents of Waltham Forest Mini Holland scheme have case thrown out of court

After losing the action, the group, quoted on, said: “Despite this latest legal setback it will cost us very little, but the cost to the council for both actions and their large legal team, will be a substantial sum from their Mini Holland budget.”

It’s not clear whether the money the council spent to defend th action will come from the £27 million set aside for the Mini Holland project, or from other council funds.

However, Waltham Forest, which has acknowledged that it spent more than £12,000 in defending the case, emphasises that it is taxpayers who will have to foot the bill.

A council spokesman said: “When someone mounts a court action against the council we have little option but to defend our legal position, particularly when legal advice indicates that the case against us is very weak.

“We made every effort to ensure that this case did not have to get to court, but in the event the claimants would not withdraw their claim.

“The total costs incurred in mounting our legal defence are still to be calculated, but we are pleased that the court awarded us costs to assist,” he added.

Waltham Forest is one of three boroughs that won Mini Holland funding from Transport for London, the others being Enfield and Kingston-upon-Thames.

– “Silent majority” back Enfield’s Mini Holland as Chris Boardman visits borough

– More on the three Mini Holland boroughs and their plans

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Latest Comments