Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Presidents of UCI and WADA critical of spectators’ hostility towards Chris Froome

IOC president, Thomas Bach, fears that suspicion is being shed on clean athletes

The president of the UCI, Brian Cookson, has described the behaviour of a number of fans during the Tour de France as ‘hooliganism’ reports The Mirror. WADA president, Sir Craig Reedie, has also said that Chris Froome should not have had to endure abuse during the race.

Froome recently won the Tour for the second time in three years, but endured abuse from a number of roadside fans. One is said to have doused him in urine while another was captured on film spitting at him.

“I am worried about the beginnings of an element of hooliganism coming towards our sport which we have largely been able to avoid in recent years,” said Cookson. “I think Chris was subjected to a fairly nasty form of antagonism from a small number of people.”

Cookson also said that he was concerned about more than just the treatment of Froome.

“There was also a little bit of slightly joking, slightly hooligan-type behaviour in places with cars being kicked and things being thrown at support vehicles.

“The Tour de France, all of cycle racing, is a great free sport – it is possible to get close to the athletes, to the competitors, in a way that is not really possible in any other sport. If we want that to continue, then we all have a responsibility to behave.”

Team Sky have blamed segments of the French media for fuelling ill-feeling towards Froome and their other riders (Richie Porte said he was punched during one stage). Froome himself has singled out ex-pro cyclists turned TV pundits Laurent Jalabert and Cedric Vasseur for dropping strong hints that they believe his performances are artificially enhanced.

WADA president, Reedie, told Sky Sports that he too was unimpressed by crowd behaviour during the race. "I think that was very regrettable and I hope that it involved only a very small number of spectators. I do not believe that is how French supporters of cycling normally behave.”

Reedie says that unless riders test positive, they should be given the benefit of the doubt.

"I assume there has been a wide and extensive testing procedure for the riders in the Tour de France and we await the results with interest. But unless there are findings or evidence to the contrary, all sports people must be given the benefit of the doubt.

"The UCI are certainly making sustained efforts to change the culture of the past. They have had an independent commission report and have created an independent anti-doping agency and I think it is pretty important the UCI wins this particular argument."

Those thoughts were echoed by IOC president, Thomas Bach, who told CNN that he thought cycling was now ‘on the right track’.

“The biggest danger is not that the cheat is being caught and that we have a doping case. The biggest danger is that with every doping case there is a suspicion being shed on the clean athletes.”

Bach said that $10 million had been earmarked by the Olympic Committee to fund anti-doping research, with a further $10 million set aside to combat match fixing and corruption.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
SNS1938 replied to wycombewheeler | 9 years ago
0 likes
wycombewheeler wrote:
SNS1938 wrote:

Then add to that the US-Postal-esq performances from Sky ...

Really? one stage win in the entire tour is US Postal esque?

That's what I saw, time and time again.

Avatar
pwake replied to SNS1938 | 9 years ago
0 likes
SNS1938 wrote:
wycombewheeler wrote:
SNS1938 wrote:

Then add to that the US-Postal-esq performances from Sky ...

Really? one stage win in the entire tour is US Postal esque?

That's what I saw, time and time again.

Sky's showing this year was nowhere near anything exceptional. On many stages, in the final, Froome was outnumbered by both Movistar and Astana.
But don't let the facts get in the way of misinformed opinion.

Avatar
SNS1938 replied to pwake | 9 years ago
0 likes

Evidentially we both observed the same race and saw very different things. There are unfortunately no facts to confirm either observation. The passed drug tests simply mean a passed drugs test, not proof of riding clean.

I see the whole Postal scenario again, where we're told that it's cadence, incremental gains and genetics, same as last time.

Sky's domestiques were stronger than other teams GC/climbers, and the other teams often had big question marks against them as far as a history of doping.

I am 100% convinced that it will play out like the early 2000's, and there'll be books written which tell all and the UCI will be back in front of us again telling us how they've cleaned up cycling again (like they did back in the Postal era). Porte's move to BMC will be interesting, the near constant busts at Astana ... It can't go on like this. Big changes are needed. And until then, there'll be pissed off fans with an over supply of urine.

Point of view clearly explained, with no facts to prove either view, it would seem we're done. Time for a ride.

Pages

Latest Comments