A report by the House of Commons Transport Committee has urged the government to accelerate the integration of other forms of transport with the rail network to get fewer people using their cars, but cyclists’ organisation CTC warns that in order to achieve this, “substantial investment” is needed in cycling infrastructure at railway stations, such as providing access to cyclists as well as bicycle parking, hire and storage facilities.
Roger Geffen, CTC Campaigns and Policy Director, said: “Currently cycle parking provision at most stations is woefully inadequate, with many cyclists having to lock their bikes to railings and lampposts. Secure cycle parking would also reverse the increase in bike theft at railway stations and would actually encourage many more people to cycle to the station.”
CTC also called for sufficient bicycle parking to be put in place for 5% of rail travellers, compared to the current level of 1.6%.
According to CTC, Britain’s busiest 88 railway station would need to have 125,000 spaces available, compared to just 8,000 at present. The shortfall is even more acute at 14 stations in Central London, claims CTC, where the current 1,365 spaces would need to be increased to 67,612, a fifty-fold increase.
Despite the huge increase in spaces required, CTC believes that the target is “achievable,” pointing out that Mayor of London Boris Johnson intends to make available a further 66,000 spaces to be made available at the capital’s railway stations, and highlighting the experience of the Netherlands, where one in three railway journeys involve a bike ride to or from the station, and bike parking is commonly provided for one in ten of a city’s population.
Even those stations where bike parking provision nears the 5% target need some attention, according to the CTC’s full response to the DfT's recent Better Rail Stations report, pointing out that since cities such as Oxford and Cambridge already have elevated levels of cycle usage, demand for spaces at those stations is higher than elsewhere and bike racks are often full to overflowing.
The full response, which can be found here, lists Britain’s busiest stations (Category A) and next busiest in terms of traffic (Category B stations) by the ratio of bike parking spaces currently provided compared to 5% of daily passenger numbers. Complete tables can be found in the CTC response document, but the top five and bottom five stations in each category (excluding five Category A and eight Category B stations that have no bike parking provision whatsoever) are:
Category A Stations Cycle 5% of passenger/ ratio
Top 5 Spaces 2009 day 2008
York 446 895 2
Bristol Temple Meads 340 970 3
Liverpool Lime Str 200 601 3
London Kings Cross 332 3,374 10
London Paddington 276 4,000 14
Bottom 5
London Liverpool Str 119 7,916 67
London Waterloo 200 13,740 69
London Bridge 100 7,414 74
B'ham New Street 24 2,344 98
London Victoria 84 10,611 126
Category B Stations Cycle 5% of passenger/ ratio
Top 5 Spaces 2009 day 2008
Oxford 616 646 1
Cambridge 748 959 1
Liverpool South Parkway 32 58 2
Didcot Parkway 166 331 2
Basingstoke 266 630 2
Bottom 5
Bromley South 30 861 29
Shenfield 12 414 35
East Croydon 62 3,195 52
Richmond (Greater London) 16 913 57
Clapham Junction 25 2,723 109
P.S. Eidetic is an adjective, not a noun.
Challenge accepted. ...
probably
Some will be disappointed that no probe is involved. As you know, both "suffering" and undignified self-abuse are both features of most cycle sports.
You may be confusing (as does the article) "gimmick with unfounded PR claims" for "solution"....
Best of all - no road or barriers as the TTer is put upon an indoor training thing, where stupidly not looking where you're going has no...
I assume that customers who purchased their chainsets/groupsets online at heavy discounted prices, will be posting them back to their retailers...
I learned a new word yesterday: solastalgia .
So glad to be able to communicate more with my axles, though I'm worried it will come at the expense of all those lovely long chats I'd been having...
Did you apply some of this to that backend server issue? Seems to have done the job, the site is no longer painful to use.