Keep your eyes on the road. That’s the message from the High Court in Northern Ireland, which has reduced the damages awarded to a cyclist involved in a collision with a car because the judge found that looking at his heart rate monitor amounted to contributory negligence.
The court awarded Conor McAllister over £50,000 in damages after finding that driver John Campbell was responsible for the injuries Mr McAllister sustained when he hit Mr Campbell’s car in November 2009.
But the damages would have been £70,000 if Mr McAllister had been looking where he was going.
According to a report in the News Letter, the car and rider were on the dual carriageway outside Ballymena when the incident happened. Mr McAllister was heading out toward Broughshane at the beginning of a ride.
Mr Campbell said he had pulled over to give his sister-in-law a lift. He said he had been stationary for 30 seconds when Mr McAllister rode straight into the back of his car.
But Mr Justice Stephens found more credible Mr McAllister’s claim that Mr Campbell had just pulled in in front of him.
He held that the length of scrape marks on the car was inconsistent with it having been stopped and the handbrake applied.
There were inconsistencies in Mr Campbell’s story, the judge said, but he did not believe the driver had acted with malicious intent.
“Without any ulterior motive he has rationalised after the event how it occurred,” Mr Justice Stephens said.
“The defendant was flustered by seeing his sister-in-law and there was a period of indecision.”
In his confusion the driver had either forgotten about the rider he had passed, or else disregarded his presence.
“This failure was negligent,” the judge said.
But Mr McAllister had contributed to the crash by looking down at his heart rate monitor, the judge found, reducing the damages by 25 percent from £70,000 to £52,500.
Mr Justice Stephens said: “He was looking down at a heart rate monitor. He should have been looking at where he was going.
“If he had been he could have braked or taken evasive action.”
If you're one of the people who require a car, surely the solution is simple? Don't buy a house there! It sounds like this suburb is being designed...
I think the time is wrong by a day. We only have 15 hours to enter, not 1 day and 15 hours.
A ban is not going to make much difference. The motorists was completely illegal anyway. This is when I would invoke the Iranian judicial system -...
The objection at the time of the published changes which seemed most ludicrous to me, but dearly held onto by many, was that giving way to...
No the Hovding style head protection is not legal in Australia. Australia has its own helmet testing standard and it's done in a way (sequential...
I don't know whether to say fair play for responding or just that you are trying to mitigate any negative response from this by denying the claims....
I have been seeing this a lot.
Concerns for the less than able, doesn't seem to count with the more than able waiting in the provided parking spaces. I mean they could wait on...
I have Galibier Trail shorts from 5 or 6 years ago, I wonder of the liner short will fit in them?
It looks pointless, but don't be fooled, it is pointless! And useless. Being a dashed line it means precisely nothing. So whatever was the...