A former Premier League footballer who pleaded guilty to assaulting a cyclist in a road rage attack, leaving him with a broken wrist, has been given a suspended sentence but has escaped a driving ban.
Jamaica international defender Nyron Nosworthy, who spent five years at Sunderland and now plays for Championship side Watford, was also ordered by Camberwell Green Magistrates' Court to pay the victim £3,300 in compensation.
Nosworthy, aged 33, was driving in London on 13 August last year when he was involved in a collision with cyclist Joe Minihane at a set of traffic lights on Westminster Bridge Road, reports the Watford Observer.
Last week, he admitted assault occasioning actual bodily harm, which resulted in Mr Minihane needing a full cast to be put on his arm and facing the prospect of a year's rehabilitation.
Theo Addae, representing the Brixton-born footballer, who was recovering from an Achilles’ tendon injury at the time, recounted how he had been driving to Oxford Circus for an appointment with a physiotherapist.
"He was making his way there, driving down the road, and at traffic lights there was a cyclist intending to go right, but was on the left and cut across the front of Mr Nosworthy's vehicle and a collision occurred."
"He wound down his window to say: 'You cut in front of me,' and the cyclist told him to "F*ck off."
Mr Addae said his client pulled over intending to speak with Mr Nosworthy, who asserted that Nosworthy came up to him in an "aggressive manner."
"At that time verbal abuse was still coming at Mr Nosworthy and he pushed Mr Minihane once only, causing the cyclist to stumble backwards and that stumble caused the injury,” added Mr Addae.
"It was only the unfortunate manner in which the cyclist fell over that caused the injury."
Sentencing him to 42 days’ imprisonment suspended for two years, District Judge Louise Hammond told him: "Road rage offences are regarded by the appeal courts as extremely serious, because of their prevalence on the road and because of the unacceptable nature of them.
"I am of the view that only a custodial sentence is justified, but because of your positive good character, because the injury was not intended and because you pleaded guilty, I'm able to suspend that sentence."
She also accepted a request from not to ban Nosworthy from driving by his lawyer, Theo Addae, who had said: "The impact would be huge i terms of his employment.
"There is a possibility of a loan move. The move will be to the north of the country, and as a result, disqualification would have a huge impact on his employment."
Football players and managers, and the lawyers acting for them, have at times resorted to what to the person in the street may seem unlikely excuses to avoid being banned from driving.
In 2012, Newcastle United defender Danny Simpson dropped a planned appeal against a six-month driving ban. The footballer, now with Queens Park Rangers, had said he was unable to afford a chauffeur, although at the time he was reportedly earning £10,000 a week.
Also in 2012, former Stoke City manager Tony Pulis escaped a driving ban after he claimed that if he were to employ a driver while he himself was disqualified, confidential information such as the club's transfer dealings might be prejudiced.
Pulis had been caught doing 96mph on a stretch of motorway where the speed limit was 60mph.
Citing the business opportunities and jobs that the club's Premier League status brought to the city, his lawyer also argued that "the people of Stoke-on-Trent could suffer if Mr Pulis lost his licence and lost his job."

43 thoughts on “Road rage footballer who admitted assaulting cyclist avoids jail and driving ban”
I have to say this seems
I have to say this seems depressing typical of our non-justice system – this bullying thug has surely demonstrated by his behaviour that he is unfit to have a driving licence. If I behaved like this in a shop queue rather than on the road I’d be in jail, not given some pathetic little telling off. As for the tripe about his job – hey, nobody made you behave like a bullying toerag.
Huge impact on his
Huge impact on his employment! Like he might have to catch a train or have a cheufer – sorry, put such mitigating circumstances are pi$$ poor.
Huge impact on his
Huge impact on his employment! Like he might have to catch a train or have a cheufer – sorry, put such mitigating circumstances are pi$$ poor.
“It was only the unfortunate
“It was only the unfortunate manner in which the cyclist fell over that caused the injury.”
So, he’d have fallen without a push then…?
That compensation is ridiculous, won’t even be noticed. Should be a couple 100k so that this f**kn*t with anger management issues would feel pain at least in his wallet.
Poor guy had to have rehab for a year!
I cannot post what I want to
I cannot post what I want to say as there may be minors reading.
I heard there were ways to
I heard there were ways to get to Oxford Circus without driving.
Having said that, cutting in front of someone with an immediate ‘f-off’ follow-through must be one of the quickest and most reliable ways to make friends.
bartsie wrote:I heard there
It’s a lot quicker to take the tube from Brixton to Oxford Circus and it’s a lot cheaper too, seeing how much parking and the congestion charge add up to. Cycling is also cheaper and quicker and better for overall fitness for a sportsman, though there are some real idiots driving cars along that route.
🙂
Twat on bike cuts across,
Twat on bike cuts across, colliding with car and the driver gets all the shit?
Something wrong here.
Oh, I forgot, this is roadcc, where only saints ride bikes. Get a grip, people.
If he’s turning right and
If he’s turning right and ahead of car to be able to turn right then it’s not cutting across, it’s just turning right. The driver shouldn’t be overtaking if there’s a chance the cyclist might be about to turn right.
Cauld Lubter wrote:Twat on
Bigger twat assaults cyclist and pretty much gets away with it. Get a grip yourself.
cyclist had made his
cyclist had made his intention to turn right known,twat in a leathal weapon should of waited
Cauld Lubter wrote:Twat on
No, not only saints, but if some nobber in a car cuts me up, would it be fine if I then smacked him if he was silly enough to stop? Probably not, and this is worse – this trainee killer has a few tonnes of metal to use as a weapon. Better to stop him now, before he succeeds.
Cauld Lubter wrote:Twat on
Yes, what’s wrong is that your tightly worded summary leaves out the fact that the driver assaulted the person on the bike andhas been convicted for it.
I expect some of your other saintly friends will be along to insinuate that the cyclist “brought it on himself” because he didn’t smile and wave at the lovely man that drove into him.
Cauld Lubter wrote:Twat on
On the other hand, I’m unlikely to forget roadcc has its share of types who enjoy trolling by always finding a way to side with the motorist, even when they are clearly in the wrong.
I don’t know about the initial incident – I’m not clear whether the cyclist signalled or not, for one thing. Perhaps he needs to brush up his cyclecraft, I don’t know. At that point I’m not clear who is in the right or wrong. Sounds as if both were angry.
However, if cyclists physically assaulted motorists every single time they were cut up by them, I think a large number of pedal-pushers would now be in jail and the Daily Mail would be denouncing the entire breed as psychopaths.
The guy initiated violence in a disagreement that didn’t merit it. He’s the one who broke the law.
I will say this is far from the worst such case I’ve heard of – in my opinion a push leading to an injury isn’t the same as punching someone in the face, say, or deliberately running someone off the road using a car. Its really not one of those cases that get me fuming about lenient sentences.
Edit – oh and the lack of a driving ban just seems, sadly, par-for-the-course. Seems as if the actual offense itself wasn’t commited using the car. There are far more infuriating cases where motorists kill or injure using the car and yet still avoid a driving ban. If those guys don’t get one it would be surprising if this guy did. Personally I think at least half of all drivers have no business being behind a wheel, but what can you do?
Wasn’t this the one that
Wasn’t this the one that drove off and said ‘good luck with tracing me’, followed by a bit of a campaign to find the cars driver?
Even if not, less than a weeks wages as a fine is poor…
2Loose wrote:Wasn’t this the
Stoke City’s Steven N’Zonzi, then of Hale, Greater Manchester. Stoke are currently 3 points above the relegation zone in the Premiership. Nosworthy is a [cough] squad player for Watford, mid-table in the Championship.
If Stoke get relegated, and Nosworthy gets a game due to injury of Watford’s other central defenders, I could have some very mixed feels about challenges between the two. 👿
No that was a french guy in
No that was a french guy in Macclesfield, this fella is from Brixton. And used to play for Gillingham, which also used to be the home of Marlon king … of sequel assault infamy. Lovely lot footballers aren’t they.
£3300 divided by 18 months
£3300 divided by 18 months pain and rehab comes to £183.33 per month (£45.83 per week) compensation! And how much does Mr Nosworthy get paid as an international and championship footballer?
Mr Minihane’s lost earnings alone are? The Magistrate has decided that Mr Minihane is not worth any more than this? Maybe he decided that shouting in the heat of the moment means he’s not entitled to a proper ‘level of consideration’.
It seems a poor show in
It seems a poor show in general. I don’t see how a football player needs a driving licence to play. Tony Pulis had a particularly feeble excuse.
what about the impact on the
what about the impact on the cyclist,s employment with a broken wrist
Used to have this guy in my
Used to have this guy in my fantasy football team back in his Sunderland days, surprisingly useful for a cheap defender.
Didn’t realise he was such a knob.
Yet again another careless
Yet again another careless driver who has an unnecessary hatred for cyclists and uses their car as a weapon. and £3,300 is nothing compared to what he earns as a footballer!!
Appeal the verdict. It’s too
Appeal the verdict. It’s too lenient.
My last ride included close
My last ride included close passes, high speed close passes, not indicating, overtaking directly towards me on narrow roads, pulling out then slowing down, overtaking then slowing down, side road pull outs without seeing me, pinch point passes, mobile phone obliviousness and a massively close left hook. All in a quick 25 mile spin. All of whom received a hearty “fuck off” and worse, in some cases. Unfortunately, not a one stopped. None ever do.
Violence against the person is rarely justified, but I’d love for one of these big name road rage idiots to come off worse and get a good slapping after coming off as the aggressor. You’re within your rights to defend yourself if you feel you’re going to be assaulted, as long as it’s reasonable, justifiable and proportionate. Don’t take any guff from these swine.
please please people get a
please please people get a grip, its a broken wrist and no matter who does it or who its against you are never going to get a custodial sentence.
It can never be proven that he deliberately tried to break the wrist as it was a push and as for a years rehab – get real. i had 2 ops on my left knee (the second quite major on the tendons / ligaments) in the space of a month and i was back at work walking normally after 6 months.
stumps wrote:please please
That’s not really the point though. The driver behaved violently, and a sensible society should not want violent people allowed to drive large metal boxes.
oldstrath wrote:stumps
That’s not really the point though. The driver behaved violently, and a sensible society should not want violent people allowed to drive large metal boxes.— stumps
And BTW, i see and deal with violence on a daily basis and this was petty. As for society i think you need to get out and smell the roses….
stumps wrote:oldstrath
That’s not really the point though. The driver behaved violently, and a sensible society should not want violent people allowed to drive large metal boxes.— oldstrath
And BTW, i see and deal with violence on a daily basis and this was petty. As for society i think you need to get out and smell the roses….— stumps
Yes we are all by now quite aware you’re plod…please get over yourself!
stumps wrote:And BTW, i see
You have a f-ing tough job, and I don’t envy you one bit. From your writing on here, you seem a very sensible guy doing a horribly difficult gig.
However, as you’re so used to being around serious violence and s**t all day, you’re not well put to judge how a civilian views violence or a confrontation like this one.
The cyclist (he was possibly/probably a knob) was knocked off, then assaulted by someone who’s likely bigger and certainly in better shape. So, person already in shock is then battered. It’s not “only” a push, it’s coming after a potentially lethal altercation with a large metal box, and done by the driver of said box.
For me, and most other people, that’s pretty damn bad.
Less bad than a knife to the stomach, I grant you that, but hardly ‘petty’ as you dismissingly describe it.
jacknorell wrote:stumps
Creep!
As for judging the level of violence – one word – objectivity!
gb901 wrote:Creep!
As for
Eh, WTF?
stumps wrote:please please
BTW, are you really claiming that if I, an ordinary person rather than a third rate professional soccer player, pushed someone over and injured them in a shop queue, I wouldnt face jail? Really?
oldstrath wrote:stumps
BTW, are you really claiming that if I, an ordinary person rather than a third rate professional soccer player, pushed someone over and injured them in a shop queue, I wouldnt face jail? Really?— stumps
Really, yes iam.
oldstrath wrote:
BTW, are you
I don’t see why you find this hard to believe. I seem to recall articles in the press listing examples of people committing violent offenses and only getting cautions. Injuring someone, even in a more deliberate way than this, doesn’t automatically lead to a jail term. I don’t think the lack of one in this case is due to the guy’s high-status job. To be honest I think its a lot more random than that.
I do wonder whether it would work out the same way if someone pushed over a policeman and broke his wrist, or if such a misdeed occurred in the midst of widespread rioting that got middle England all in a tizzy, say. I’m far from convinced its always consistent in every case.
But there’s nothing particularly exceptional about not going to jail for an incident like this, whether its a footballer or a bricklayer.
I don’t even think its especially cycling or motoring related. The actual offense occurred when both had transformed into pedestrians, after all! Bloody pedestrians, they need to get their house in order.
stumps wrote:please please
Seriously, there’s no need for him to have intent to specifically break the wrist. He was intentionally violent, which caused a foreseeable harm.
Which specific harm is irrelevant.
With your reasoning, if I intentionally tried to hit you in the knee with a steel pipe, and then connected with the hip instead, there was no criminal intent…
stumps wrote:It can never be
My old man is still having physio on his wrist ten years after breaking it, uniformed or not I wouldn’t fancy your chances of anything resembling a polite response if you decided to nip round and tell him to “get real”.
Let’s be honest here, the police will not have given two fucks about the cyclist and were probably chuffed as buttons that they got to have a footballer grace their presence (hence the giant shoehorning of their insistence of how great he was with their enquiries yada yada). Nosworthy will have had a very pricey legal team representing him, a team pulling out all the stops to ensure the very best result for their client versus the CPS. The CPS probably had someone representing them who just happened to draw the short straw that morning and got lumbered with the case and yet Nosworthy was still guided to plead guilty got handed a suspended sentence and a fine. Much less than any right thinking person would believe he should have got but if the cyclist was in anyway in the wrong Nosworthy’s legal team would have had this bounced out of court in seconds.
Funny isn’t it, if Nosworthy had responded to somebody swearing at him by breaking their wrist on a football pitch he would have been given a stiffer punishment by the FA.
Instead he pretty much gets away with hitting someone with a car, getting out, abusing them and then assaulting them. Madness.
farrell wrote:stumps wrote:It
Aha, sweet FA
🙂
“disqualification would have
“disqualification would have a huge impact on his employment.”
should never be able to use that as a reason for not disqualifying a driver… there’s always public transport or the bicycle or taxi or even if rich enough, employing a chauffeur to drive you around…
It always ‘takes 2 to tango’,
It always ‘takes 2 to tango’, but if the adrenalines up and the insults are flying, this is often where it ends up. Given the choice of backing away (call the police as there was a collision) with a bit of wounded pride, or ‘squaring up’, getting a broken wrist (could have been a lot worse), a payout with the other bloke prosecuted, I think I’d take the former. No winners here. There’s that great line when your in the mood to ‘stand your ground’, “you may be right….but you’ll be dead right”. Remember the cyclist who slapped the car and the motorist just chased him down, ran over him and killed him. Actions or response….consequences.
I don’t understand why a
I don’t understand why a driving ban isn’t applicable just because it would cause inconvenience. Administering justice is suppose to affect the offender isn’t it?
Ironically if the injured
Ironically if the injured cyclist had used a racial epithet against nosworthy no doubt the full force of the law would have been brought down upon him?
Strange that the law today views injury to ones sensitivity more seriously than actual physical harm!
gb901 – yeah whatever…..
gb901 – yeah whatever….. (|:
jacknorell – thanks for that, after 27 years off dealing with dross it does blunt the edges a bit, which i sometimes forget and its not until i read comments like yours that i have to remind myself of such, cheers mate its appreciated.
Am I missing something
Am I missing something here?
Surely! If having a driving licence is so essential to your way of life, employment, etc., I would have thought that you would be ever so careful not to do anything that would jeopardise your having one.
Why should the consequences of you being a cock be any less than someone else being a cock?