Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist collision database could save lives & reduce injuries, says medical charity - but it needs funding

Barts and the London charity says not enough use being made of data to help prevent collisions

A charity associated with the Royal London Hospital, where hundreds of seriously injured cyclists have been treated in recent years, is looking for donors to help fund a database of cycling casualties that it says can help reduce the number of people killed or seriously injured while riding their bikes.

Barts and the London Charity says that while advances in surgical treatments are helping save lives, analysis of information regarding collisions involving bike riders is key to improving cycle safety.

Research reported in the London Evening Standard shows that since 2004, the Royal London hospital's trauma team has treated 708 cyclists admitted with serious injuries following road traffic collisions, all but 40 of whom survived.

However, the charity says it needs donors to help fund its proposed database, which it believes can cut cyclist casualties, and it also says that the idea of using data to prevent collisions isn't receiving enough attention at the moment.

The database would cost £130,000 to develop and would be accompanied by a smartphone app that would enable victims to provide details of their recovery from their injuries.

The Standard's Ross Lydall says that data captured would include "whether the crash involved a HGV, car or pedestrian, the personal details of the cyclist, what happened before the collision, and if helmet and high-visibility clothing were worn."

Together with other information such as the location of the incident, that could allow patterns to be identified, as well as hotspots being mapped.

According to Barts Charity: “There is evidence that reduction in mortality is due to improvements in trauma and emergency care at major trauma centres such as the Royal London hospital, rather than effective pre-collision interventions.”

Barts Charity hosted a seminar at the end of January, chaired by broadcaster Jon Snow, who is also president of national cyclists' organisation CTC, which addressed the question: "Can advances in medicine and research at Barts Health impact the number of killed or seriously injured people from cycling incidents?"

One of the speakers was the Barts Health NHS Trust's professor of public health, Allyson Pollock, who said: “We have pretty good data on mortality through the police reports. What we don’t have is good data on injuries — the mechanism, location and cause of injury.

“That would help us identify injury hotspots and where we need to make an intervention, and monitor whether an intervention works. At the moment, we are working in the dark on injury prevention.”

Changes in NHS accident emergency provision in the capital in recent years and the development of its major trauma unit has seen the Royal London become the busiest hospital for such cases in the capital, with a 2009 study finding it had twice the number of admissions as the next biggest, King's College Hospital.

That's reflected in the growth in the number of cyclists admitted there with serious injuries - 24 in 2004, but 117 last year.

The vast majority of patients admitted to the Royal London's trauma unit are taken there by the London Ambulance Service or London’s Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, which is based there, but some also arrive from outside the capital, including in the Essex & Herts or Kent & Surrey air ambulances.

Despite the growth of cycling in London in recent years, according to Transport for London data, the average number of cyclists killed each year on the city's streets over the past decade is 13, down from 16 in the ten years to 2003.

However, the number of people seriously injured has been climbing steadily, almost doubling from 332 in 2004 to 657 in 2012, the last year for which data are available.

Green Party politician Baroness Jones has regularly questioned Mayor of London Boris Johnson and TfL over cycle safety, and has said that her own analysis of data relating to casualties and the level of cycling in London proves that contrary to claims that cycling is getting safer in London, the opposite is the case.

She told road.cc yesterday: "Road Safety campaigners have always known that to understand road danger, you have to count the injured as well as the dead. It's time that Boris admitted he has made London's roads less safe and began to reverse the trend. London needs more cyclists, not fewer."

Barts Charity has set up a @cycleinnovation Twitter feed where you can find more information about its proposals.

 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
Leviathan replied to kie7077 | 10 years ago
0 likes
Neil753 wrote:

Blaa, blaa, blaa.

kie7077 wrote:

Actually Neil I found your post to be patronising, I was in a lane to turn right, the bus was in a lane to go forward and yet the bus after passing me started to drift in to my lane even though it was not turning anywhere - this endangered my life and it was in no way my fault but you somehow found reason to advise me on my cycling regardless.

Neil, if I am incited to post it is because your posts continue to contain pernicious victim blaming. As Kie says above you are patronising. The fact that you can make over 300 hundred posts in just a couple of months almost exclusively on the the subjects of HGVs and HiViz shows that you have an obsession. You regularly preface you comments with 'As a cyclist' before blaming the victim of an incident rather than admitting that motorist's poor behaviour is nearly always the cause of the incident. When I see 'As a cyclist' I read 'I am not a racist, But...'
I won't forget it was YOU that claimed injured cyclists were taking money from children's cancer research. The disgusting subtext in all your comments is regularly lambasted but many posters, but you don't seem to notice. If you don't want people to reply perhaps you should diversify your interests.

Avatar
racyrich | 10 years ago
0 likes

What a load of rubbish. The overwhelming majority of riders who are knocked off don't go to hospital at all.
Yet the set of circumstances leading to a serious injury or a slight one, or sucessfully swerving and avoiding one at all, can be identical. A proper analysis of what causes collisions and resultant injuries would have to record all the non- and slight- injury incidents. That's just not going to happen.

Avatar
sfichele replied to racyrich | 10 years ago
0 likes

Would this help? We already have an extensive system of documenting bad infrastructure and bad drivers - it's called youtube. And thus far very little has been done to address the problems being reported...

Pages

Latest Comments