Team GB launches Rio Olympics kit

It is now 3 March, Meteorological Springtime by the calendar. Where was this article three months ago? It is (forehead slappingly) plain, to me at least, that deep Winter garment reviews are not Spring fare, we needed this content in October or November. By the start of next Winter, the en mode colour pallettes will all have changed and I will hopefully be a size smaller. Poor show there RCC.

It is now 3 March, Meteorological Springtime by the calendar. Where was this article three months ago? It is (forehead slappingly) plain, to me at least, that Deep winter garment reviews are not Spring fare, we needed this content in October or November. By the start of next Winter, the en mode colour pallettes will all have changed and I will hopefully be a size smaller. Poor show there RCC.

A queue of motor vehicles with a pissed off cyclist trying to filter through them is more likely.

Is drinking alcohol on the podium mandatory? Believe it or not, some cyclists don't drink beer or coffee, and don't swallow gels packed in unrecyclable wrappers.

Based on my past experience with the Caledonia, tyre clearance is rather indicative. 34 mm fit if inflated at 50 psi, or else the rear tyre rubs against the frame. Other than that, a versatile bike that goes fast on the roads, shows agility on dry trails and makes cyclotouring pleasant. Glad they have a mechanical version.

"It was truly an unintentional act on my part" to drive some considerable distance at well over the speed limit, frequently on the wrong side of the road, blowing through several red lights, mounting the kerb and hitting multiple other road users until eventually I killed someone. Hmmm, yeah - easily done if your attention wanders for a moment...

I bought Cues 9-speed last November, even though it's probably not going on until next year, but without the front mech and shifter on the grounds that the Sora front gear probably isn't worn out

The footage here is worth seeing, particularly the overtake towards a small group of cyclists. Along with other descriptions of his driving in this case and "... the defendant had 12 previous convictions for 27 crimes from the age of 16 including robbery, aggravated vehicle taking and driving offences." But cyclists. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgjn1rpwn7o

My goodness, you really are determined to defend your muddleheaded comment, aren't you? Firstly you tried lofty patronisation, telling me that I must be "misremembering or mischaracterising" the research I was quoting, then when I give you chapter and verse you tried to claim that I was selectively quoting (I wasn't, I was just quoting the portion relevant to our discussion, if I was going to selectively quote why would I give you a link to the original source?) and then tried to rubbish the source on the bizarre grounds that it is quoting a book that is "not freely available". You then tried to dismiss the research on the basis that "other information I find online" (no quotation, no source) disagrees with it. I mean really, hats (or helmets) off for trying, if nothing else. However, let's assume that your assertion that it takes a force of 1000 N to cause a simple fracture in a human skull is correct (it isn't, but let's assume). In walking trip falls where the subject's head contacts a solid surface, say a doorframe or a kerbstone, it's common for the skull to experience a momentary force of between 70-120 G. As I'm sure you know, 1G equates to approximately 9.8 N, so a person tripping when walking and smashing their head on a solid object can experience a force of well in excess of 1000 N. This makes your assertion that you don't need a helmet because the good old skull is pretty tough look fairly silly, given that it can fracture in a simple fall from a height of less than 2 m with no other force exerted upon it. By all means argue that helmets aren't an effective protection against skull fractures, but claiming that there's no need to worry about skull damage because it's pretty tough is almost as risible as your claim that your hair will protect you from abrasions, something about which I'm still chuckling days later.

+1 I much prefer them and would choose them over hydraulics if manufacturers made it possible. I find the difference in modulation is minimal and far outweighed by the ability to adjust the pad gap on the fly (not having to do 80 miles of a century, as I once did, with brake rub because of a warped rotor) and the ease of a simple cable replacement when necessary rather than the massive hassle of draining and refilling a hydraulic system. I am happy with the bikes I've got at the moment but when the new (secondhand) bike itch resurfaces I might well go back a few years in order to get one with mechanical, rather than hydraulic, discs.