Things are turning frosty this Christmas in Darlington, where tensions are being whipped up between the town’s cyclists and its ice cream vendors, after one seller complained that “arseholes” were inconsiderately leaving their bikes next to his van – which he parked next to a set of cycle racks.
At the weekend, the owner of Gwenny’s Ice’s, based in the County Durham market town, took to Facebook to criticise a cyclist who parked their bike on one of the racks located in the pedestrian area of town centre, which he claimed was blocking the door to his van.
“Turns out, common sense isn’t actually that common,” Gwenny’s posted on the social media platform on Saturday.
“This is what’s wrong with the world today, No Respect, No Common Sense, a sense of Self Entitlement and Discourteous. Out of all the available Bike Racks, you choose that one right next to the entry/exit of the vehicle. I bet your [sic] an absolute joy to be around.”
He continued: “I hope whoever the owner of the bike is, stands on a plug over the Christmas Period. Arsehole. No wonder Jeremy Clarkson hates cyclists.”
However, the post, which has attracted over 200 comments, was heavily condemned by Darlington’s cycling community, with one writing: “Ice cream van parks on pedestrian area and also too close to bike rack and complains.”
That comment provoked Gwenny’s to reply: “Ice Cream Van parks on the still accessible and recognised A1 PUBLIC Highway which is open to traffic between restricted hours and parks in the allocated location which allows cyclists to be able to park freely and conveniently without hindrance after a 30-day consultation.”
“Imagine parking on a spot specifically for bikes then moaning when there are bikes,” added Callum, while Dave wrote: “Oh dear!! A cyclist using a cycle bay!! Get ‘em off the roads!!”
That reaction to his initial complaint then prompted Gwenny’s owner to post: “In relation to my previous post that’s caused quite the stir today… Merry Christmas, accept [sic] for those who don’t show integrity, common sense, and curtosy [sic].
He continued: “You’ve made my head fall off and driven me to the drink cause I can’t quite understand how the human brain works sometimes however given me some good entertainment on the train and I want to thank you for that.
“Don’t Stub your toe, or slip on ice on your bike over the winter period.”
And if that wasn’t enough, on Sunday another local cyclist parked their bike on one of the town centre’s cycle racks – again apparently blocking the ice cream van’s door. When the cyclist returned to their bike, however, they found it turned upside down, with Gwenny’s posting photographic evidence of this manoeuvre on Facebook.
“Play stupid games, win stupid prizes,” Gwenny’s wrote, in their third consecutive post on cycle parking in Darlington.
“We’ve now got another member of the crew thinking they’re funny. Locking the bike up at 13:20 blocking us in on the van this time. He’s walked off and sat and watched us clueless…Then cried on when somehow his bike was magically put upside down.
“Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should,” he continued. “I’ll never understand why people go out there way to intentionally goade [sic] or antagonise when trying to be professional.
“Anyway, he’s not happy and now he’s cycling round the town with his camera out recording.”
In response to Gwenny’s philosophical conclusion that “just because you can, doesn’t mean you should”, Darlington resident Donna replied: “Same goes to you about his bike, he had every right to park his bike there, maybe when you pull your van up to stay for long periods, make sure you’re not blocking yourself in if someone chooses to use a bike rack.”
When approached by road.cc, the owner of Gwenny’s refused to comment or provide any further information (you could say he flaked out).
Instead, he asked us to submit a formal request for details and the use of his images “via a letter signed and dated” and delivered to the business’s address (which is why we have used embedded versions of his posts in this story).
“As you can imagine when running a business our availability is limited. Although the weather may be cold, our demand for our frozen products is still high,” the ice cream van owner told road.cc via email.
“Christmas is the season of love, giving, joy and togetherness and therefore here at Gwenny’s we wish you a Very Merry Christmas.”
Darlington Borough Council weren’t quite as elusive, however, confirming to road.cc that the Gwenny’s Ices van was parked in Darlington town centre over the weekend, and that the local authority is “aware of the disagreement”, which is currently being investigated by the council’s licensing team.
The council also told road.cc that Gwenny’s does have a licence to trade from a pitch in the town centre, but that there “remains a question of whether it’s been parked in quite the right place on this occasion”.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, this isn’t the first time Gwenny’s has courted controversy over its parking.
Back in March, a ‘turf row’ broke out between the seller and another ice cream van company, Nevisons Super Whip, over their spots near the town’s South Park, sparking allegations of harassment, with Durham Constabulary forced to intervene to cool things down.
Talk about a Häagen-Dazs-aster. I’ll get my coat.

34 thoughts on ““Common sense isn’t that common”: Ice cream van owner has meltdown over bikes blocking door… after parking beside cycle racks”
If only there was another
If only there was another door on his van, this whole story would be an irrelevance
AidanR wrote:
The driver’s door is obviously on the wrong side
Awfully ironic of an ice
Awfully ironic of an ice cream van driver to be complaining about cycle parking given how infamous they are in london for parking in the cycle lane on westminster bridge.
I don’t recommend turning
I don’t recommend turning one of those vans upside down, of course.
Maybe somebody should just
Maybe somebody should just surround the bike racks with cones…
Careful – you don’t want to
Careful – you don’t want to encourage anything that would put a Rocket up the dispute – it already seems to be Spiralling into a Viendetta.
belugabob wrote:
They should have a larger area of different colours setts in the cobbles, and a small sign explaining the space that must be kept clear to allow roll-in roll-out parking of eg e-trikes and large mobility scooters. I think the space required is something like 3m (which is the same as the straight approach to an anti-wheelchair barrier for manoeuvering).
W4W have lots of Guidelines.
mattw wrote:
Your suggestion would be Fab for people with physical impairment, such as Funny Feet
Good to have an ice cream van
Good to have an ice cream van story to commemorate Chris Rea.
Setting aside whether or not
Setting aside whether or not the van is supposed to be parked directly next to the cycle racks (which seems odd if so), it seems the owner of the bike ‘blocking his door’ has perhaps acted with some consideration for the van owner. The cyclist could have parked their bike opposite the serving window, which might have prevented him serving his hungry patrons.
What a strange thing to whinge about. Perhaps this is an ill-conceived strategy to cash in on the anti-cycling gelato-lover market demographic. Many cyclists I know tend to be partial to sugary snacks; perhaps he should try a rethink. Or just be less of a knob.
Jbnuts wrote:
That was my first thought but then I thought about my many visits to the ice cream van in my youth. The serving hatch was always on the passenger side so that it faced the pavement when the van pulled up. I looked at the picture and that looks to be the case here too. The side window looks to be a) shut and b) blocked by boxes of sweets etc. and c) drivers side so unlikely to be his usual serving hatch.
My suspicion is this guy wasn’t even plying his trade, he was just parked up there while shopping or something as otherwise his queue of customers was going to be standing in the road.
And even if he was plying his trade there, his driver’s door would be blocking one Sheffield stand and the hatch another two. How entitled a 99 flake is he to want to block 60% of the available spaces?
“Turns out, common sense isn
“Turns out, common sense isn’t actually that common,” Gwenny’s….
And if you own an ice cream van, entirely absent.
99 problems but the sales
99 problems but the sales pitch ain’t one
At least he didn’t damage the
At least he didn’t damage the bike. Quite Magnumanimous of him.
Did anybody else’s dad tell
Did anybody else’s dad tell them that ice cream vans played ‘Greensleeves” to let people know they had run out of ice cream ☹️
This guy seems to be a
This guy seems to be a character from Peter Kay’s ‘The Ice-cream Man Cometh’.
Not reported elsewhere: nice
Not reported elsewhere: nice scoop, Ryan!
A bit slow off the mark
A bit slow off the mark though – he could have posted this story on Sundae.
Does he work weekends? It’s
Does he work weekends? It’s not in his cone-tract.
This is quite an important
This is quite an important one.
Some disabled mobility aid users need to exit forward (reverse gear with electric power and inability to lift it mainly), and Gwenny should know enough not to be blocking them.
He should have a “blocking lawful users of the public highway” ticket for that one.
mattw wrote:
I doubt he thought about it enough to consider that. It was more just a case of “sorbet – parked in it”.
Interesting.
Interesting.
I put a carefully argued comment on his Facebook pointing out what I mentioned above, and pointing out Section 2.21 of the Street Trading Code in Darlington, and pointing out that he is storing up complaints for renewal time:
“The consent holder shall, on all occasions when carrying on business, be strictly sober, and conduct him/herself in a proper, civil and courteous manner. He/she shall not carry on his/her business in such a way as to cause annoyance to the occupier or person in charge of any shop or business, to any resident, or person using the street.”
So I’ll have to ask Darlington to introduce roll in roll out mobility aid education into their CoP, and train their enforecement officers to educate street traders. And copy it to his email to indicate I am about improving practice, not getting him banned.
I need another diplomacy lesson from W4W Kate.
You don’t need permission to
You don’t need permission to use his images.
It’s reporting the news, and is an exception under Copyright Law.
You need to respect his moral rights by giving credit.
How do you think the Daily Mail does it?
Our own in-house rule is that
Our own in-house rule is that we don’t download images directly from social media if, after asking, we were not given permission to use them.
mattw wrote:
Images are specifically excluded from the “fair dealing” exemption in the UK in relation to news reporting, it’s OK for short video or audio but not photographs:
Criticism, review and reporting current events
Fair dealing for criticism, review or quotation is allowed for any type of copyright work. Fair dealing with a work for the purpose of reporting current events is allowed for any type of copyright work other than a photograph. In each of these cases, a sufficient acknowledgement will be required.
As stated, a photograph cannot be reproduced for the purpose of reporting current events. The intention of the law is to prevent newspapers or magazines reproducing photographs for reporting current events which have appeared in competitors’ publications.
Full guidance on GOV.UK here
Rendel Harris wrote:
Thank-you that is interesting.
(As an aside permission is often in the T&C for posting an image to social media, unless the law has excluded it recently.)
The Daily Mail doesn’t report
The Daily Mail doesn’t report news, it creates sensationalism to drive up advertising revenue. See Wikipedia.
mattw wrote:
The Daily Heil does it by stealing photos and then having to cough up if a photographers realises.
Icecream van driver in a
Iscream van driver in a complete meltdown!
I’ve heard he’s a bit of a
I’ve heard he’s a bit of a flake TBF
Bloody cyclist locking his
Bloody cyclist locking his bike up at a designated bike stand. How dairy.
“Turns out, common sense isn
“Turns out, common sense isn’t actually that common.”
I can’t manage to park my ice cream van in a suitable place for customers to queue (in the middle of winter?). F wit.
Be funny if this melon comes
Be funny if this melon comes back from his lunchbreak one day to find his crappy wee van upside down, looks pretty top heavy I’m sure a few fit lads would wobble it over. Play stupid games etc.
Gwenny’s might want to think
Gwenny’s might want to think about what it does for the image of their business to post pictures of their operatives drinking beer whilst sitting in the driver’s seat of their van. Not technically illegal but questionable at best.