Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Bauke Mollema’s bike makes mockery of UCI weight limit

Trek rider shares photo of 6.76kg race bike ahead of Mont Ventoux stage

Since the year 2000, all professional race bikes have had to adhere to the UCI’s 6.8kg weight limit. But the advances of technology means it’s now very easy to build a bike that is under the weight limit, and yesterday Trek-Segafredo’s Bauke Mollema shared this picture of his Trek Emonda. It weighs just 6.76kg. 

That his bike weighs just 6.76kg is no surprise. The Emonda has a frame weight of just 690g and it is possible with some very exotic parts to get it down to just 4.6kg! Mollema’s bike sticks to more conventional equipment if you call a full Dura-Ace Di2 groupset conventional. Doubtless the mechanics will need to add some weights to bring it up to 6.8kg. 

- Pinarello puts Chris Froome’s Tour de France race bike on a diet. But what's the point?

As we talked about the other day with Chris Froome’s Pinarello F8X Light, getting a race bike under 6.8kg isn’t too difficult these days, but ensuring it doesn’t dip under is obviously critical. There’s only so much that swapping carbon for aluminium and adding deeper section wheels will gain you in weight, so at some point lead weights will need to be added. 

- Could the UCI scrap the 6.8kg weight limit in 2016?

It’s not clear what the Trek mechanics will do to balance out the weight of Mollema’s bike. Weight added under the bottle cage mount is an easy one because you can add or remove weight as needed depending on the specific build of the bike that day.

The rest of his build includes shallow section Bontrager Aeolus 3, which save weight over the standard Aeolus 5. Bontrager provides the handlebar, stem, bar tape and saddle. Mollema uses an SRM power meter to track his performance. 

That weight is with pedals and the GPS stick attached to the saddle, supplied by Dimension Data to provide real-time data from riders during the race. It’s not clear how much weight that adds to the bike, we’ve heard reports of it being in the region of 80g.

The Dutch rider has his pick of Trek’s bikes, including the Domane and Madone, but for today’s mountain stage, which features Mont Ventoux (well, most of it anyway) he’ll be riding Trek’s lightest ever frame, the Emonda. Mollema is a climber and will be hoping to feature in the final selection on the key mountain stages.

- Trek launch superlight Émonda road bike

Speaking in 2015 about which bike he chooses for a stage and why, he says, “The Madone is a fast bike and you save watts [energy] on flat roads. This year I was fresher in the last week of the Tour compared to the last years and maybe that's also because of the energy I saved the first 10 days. I changed bikes in the Pyrenees because in the mountains weight is very important. The Émonda is a great climbing bike and the weight of the bikes is a few 100 grammes less than the Madone. In the Tour the general classification was decided uphill so I wanted to have the best bike for climbing.”

He also adds that switching between the Madone and Emonda is easy. 

“Changing from the Madone to the Émonda was easy. I had spent so much time on the Émonda in the beginning of the season that I felt at home on it straight away. I did the last 10 stages on the Émonda and I didn't change back to the Madone. Well, except for the last day in Paris. I did this because of the cobbles on the Champs Elysees. They might not look so on TV but they are pretty bad, and the Madone with its Isospeed technology was, in my opinion, the best choice for this stage. Simply, more comfort. It was easy to change the bikes because our mechanics are fantastic and they have the bikes dialled in exactly the same position,” he says.

David worked on the road.cc tech team from 2012-2020. Previously he was editor of Bikemagic.com and before that staff writer at RCUK. He's a seasoned cyclist of all disciplines, from road to mountain biking, touring to cyclo-cross, he only wishes he had time to ride them all. He's mildly competitive, though he'll never admit it, and is a frequent road racer but is too lazy to do really well. He currently resides in the Cotswolds, and you can now find him over on his own YouTube channel David Arthur - Just Ride Bikes

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
Paul J | 7 years ago
0 likes

Why?

The rule has a clear purpose, to prevent an arms-race on weight, and turning cycling into a competition of manufacturers, rather than a competition of athletes as it should be. If it was down to me, they would all be on the _same_ bicycle (competition supplied, or regulated to high heaven). Ala the keirin racing in Japan.

Please spare bicycle racing from the male-obsession with technology.!

Avatar
Leviathan | 7 years ago
5 likes

Its made from a special Balco molymer.

Avatar
monkeytrousers replied to Leviathan | 7 years ago
0 likes
Leviathan wrote:

Its made from a special Balco molymer.

Get your coat.

Avatar
Simon E | 7 years ago
2 likes

Question: how will the racing improve by making the bikes 0.8 kg / 1.5 kg lighter?

Answer: it won't.

The UCI has far bigger fish to fry - e.g. motors, doping, crowd control, team stability - than changing the rules on the minimum bike weight. But it seems bike weight is the most important thing for Mamils looking to justify buying yet another £8k carbon bike.

Avatar
bikebot replied to Simon E | 7 years ago
1 like
Simon E wrote:

Question: how will the racing improve by making the bikes 0.8 kg / 1.5 kg lighter?

Answer: it won't.

The UCI has far bigger fish to fry - e.g. motors, doping, crowd control, team stability - than changing the rules on the minimum bike weight. But it seems bike weight is the most important thing for Mamils looking to justify buying yet another £8k carbon bike.

Actually, it could help with the motor issue. Obviously the lighter the bike, the less grams available to hide the system. 

Avatar
Paul_C replied to bikebot | 7 years ago
0 likes
bikebot wrote:
Simon E wrote:

Question: how will the racing improve by making the bikes 0.8 kg / 1.5 kg lighter?

Answer: it won't.

The UCI has far bigger fish to fry - e.g. motors, doping, crowd control, team stability - than changing the rules on the minimum bike weight. But it seems bike weight is the most important thing for Mamils looking to justify buying yet another £8k carbon bike.

Actually, it could help with the motor issue. Obviously the lighter the bike, the less grams available to hide the system. 

with that logic, one way to rule out motors is to also have a maximum weight limit, say 7.5 kilos...

Avatar
Jimnm replied to Simon E | 7 years ago
1 like
Simon E wrote:

Question: how will the racing improve by making the bikes 0.8 kg / 1.5 kg lighter?

Answer: it won't.

The UCI has far bigger fish to fry - e.g. motors, doping, crowd control, team stability - than changing the rules on the minimum bike weight. But it seems bike weight is the most important thing for Mamils looking to justify buying yet another £8k carbon bike.

I am surprised that they don't have handicap tours where all weight is the same for reach rider and bike. Led saddle bags etc. Like horse racing haha! The big guys wouldn't need much led in their saddle bags lol

Avatar
jimt | 7 years ago
4 likes

I'm sure the current 6.8kg limit suits the bike manufacturers. 

As it is you get to see all of the manufacturers range of bikes, aero, climbing etc all within the limit. If it was dropped you may only see the "lightweight" model being ridden.

 

This also brings up the point that if the aero and climbers bikes are both at 6.8kg then why not use the aero bike for its watt savings?

Avatar
Jamminatrix replied to jimt | 7 years ago
0 likes
jimt wrote:

As it is you get to see all of the manufacturers range of bikes, aero, climbing etc all within the limit. If it was dropped you may only see the "lightweight" model being ridden.

This is also the big reason discs are being considered by pros.

When your rim brake bike and disc brake bike can weigh the same because of UCI weight limit, discs are a no-brainer!

If you take away the weight limit, most pros would not add all that weight to their bike... Heavier wheels (steel rotors, bigger hubs, axles, more spokes), calipers with steel braided wires and fluid, frames with beefy metal tabs, etc. Sure, discs will get lighter eventually, but there's still a weight penalty right now.

Avatar
Butty | 7 years ago
1 like

If it's not weighed on the official scales then it doesn't count

Latest Comments