Home
Different approaches to getting Britain cycling

You wait ages for a handbook on designing facilities for cycling and two come at once. Active travel charity Sustrans has today launched its Handbook for cycle-friendly design, and local campaign umbrella group Cyclenation is launching its Making Space for Cycling handbook at the Cycle City expo in Leeds.

Making Space for Cycling is sponsored by the cycle industry through its Bike Hub funding scheme backed by the Bicycle Association and independent bike dealers, while the Sustrans handbook is part of the organisation’s series of resources for enabling active travel.

Well laid-out and easy to read, Making Space for Cycling is the friendlier of the two documents. It also explains why towns should provide space for cycling, in terms of its benefits for both individuals and communities.

Because Cyclenation is an umbrella group for local campaign organisations Making Space for Cycling reflects some recent thinking, emphasising the importance of separating cyclists from motor traffic, and pointing out numerous examples of how not to do it.

The Sustrans Handbook for cycle-friendly design is rather denser and more technical, with lots of detailed examples of cycling infrastructure. Some of those examples have already been criticised by cycling activists, who point out that ideas such as two-stage right turns have been deprecated in the Netherlands.

Many of Sustrans’ illustrations are of designs for on-street cycle lanes, a concept many activists now believe simply cannot be done well.

Making Space for Cycling is far more of a manifesto than the Handbook for cycle-friendly design. Where the Sustrans document seems largely content to accept the status quo. For example, it says: “on-highway  design should reinforce how people are taught to cycle in National  Standards / Bikeability Level 2, in particular primary and secondary  road positioning.”

Making Space for Cycling, on the other hand, recognises the main reason people give for not cycling. It says: “mixing with traffic puts people off cycling, especially children”.

This difference in approach is perhaps most marked when it comes to obstructing cycle paths. Sustrans suggests slowing riders with “2  rows of staggered bollards. 1.5m between bollards, 5m from junction”. That’s a design that can make it very difficult to pass while towing a trailer or for disabled riders using accessible bikes.

Making Space for Cycling suggests the use of bollards only to stop larger motor vehicles from using cycling routes. “Only use an odd number of simple bollards spaced about 1.8 metres apart, arranged to separate opposing flows, not to obstruct them or force them into conflict. … The risk of motorbikes using these routes is not great enough to restrict free movement of larger bicycles or pushchairs and wheelchairs.”

You can download the two documents and draw your own conclusions:

Making Space for Cycling is available from http://www.makingspaceforcycling.org.

Sustrans Handbook for cycle-friendly design can be downloaded from the organisation’s Dropbox.

Our official grumpy Northerner, John has been riding bikes for over 30 years since discovering as an uncoordinated teen that a sport could be fun if it didn't require you to catch a ball or get in the way of a hulking prop forward.

Road touring was followed by mountain biking and a career racing in the mud that was as brief as it was unsuccessful.

Somewhere along the line came the discovery that he could string a few words together, followed by the even more remarkable discovery that people were mug enough to pay for this rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work. He's pretty certain he's worked for even more bike publications than Mat Brett.

The inevitable 30-something MAMIL transition saw him shift to skinny tyres and these days he lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

6 comments

Avatar
Al__S [1268 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

On one side: Sustrans, calling for same-old-same-old, with bollards, 1.5m wide cycle lanes etc. On the other: Everyone else. Calling for much, much better.

Avatar
mrmo [2096 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

I'll take the making space please,

Do the job properly.

Avatar
cat1commuter [1422 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

Some of the Sustrans designs look good (such as cycle lanes with priority over side roads), other naff. Guess which get built more often? I can't believe that they appear to endorse such rubbish infrastructure by having photos of it in a new document.

Avatar
HKCambridge [224 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes
cat1commuter wrote:

Some of the Sustrans designs look good (such as cycle lanes with priority over side roads), other naff. Guess which get built more often? I can't believe that they appear to endorse such rubbish infrastructure by having photos of it in a new document.

'Guess which get built more often' is exactly the issue. The Sustrans examples I've seen (haven't read whole document yet) often don't have the bad bits as the first option. They're trying to outline how to make a bad solution not quite so bad. Problem is, it's legitimising a bad solution, and under road constraints and pressure to maximise vehicle capacity, that's going to be most road engineer's first choice.

Avatar
Mr Agreeable [183 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

I really can't think of anything to add to what David Hembrow has already written here:

http://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/2014/05/sustrans-handbook-for-cycle...

I really appreciate the work Sustrans have done to normalise cycling, and make people aware of its possibilities, but they need to up their game if they're going to stop being synonymous with dodgy infrastructure.

Avatar
mrmo [2096 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes
cat1commuter wrote:

(such as cycle lanes with priority over side roads)

When i have seen this done, it was screwed up. You had some side roads with priority and others without, add into the mix that many(most?) drivers and many(most?) shared use path users, don't realise how priority actually works. Drivers would go straight through the give way signs, pavement users wouldn't assert their priority because they might be in the right, but being dead isn't very helpful!