- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Tadcaster Road, York (Google Maps)£1,000 fine and 12-month ban for DPD delivery driver who left cyclist with broken neck after cutting across cycle lane
A delivery driver has been fined just under £1,000 and banned from driving for 12 months after pleading guilty to causing serious injury by careless driving, following a collision in a bike lane which left a female cyclist with a broken neck.
DPD employee Florin Varga was driving on Tadcaster Road in York, in the direction of the city centre, on 23 April 2024, when he attempted to turn right into Middlethorpe Drive, after an oncoming motorist flashed their lights to indicate that it was safe for Varga to turn.
However, as the delivery driver made the turn, he crashed into a female cyclist, who was travelling in the opposite direction to Varga, in the road’s painted cycle lane. The collision left the cyclist with rib injuries and broken bones in her neck, requiring her to undergo surgery to repair the bones with metal plates.
In court this week, Varga’s defence barrister Harriet Eglinton said that the delivery driver stayed at the scene of the crash and had called the emergency services, the York Press reports.
However, district judge Adrian Lower criticised the van driver’s decision to make the right turn solely on the basis of another motorist’s flashing lights.
“What you didn’t know, and I am sure the other motorist didn’t know, is that [the cyclist] was on a push bike on the other side of that vehicle,” he told Varga.
“Instead of waiting to make sure that the road was clear, you committed yourself to turn into the road to your right.”
Varga pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by careless driving, and was fined £650. The judge also banned him from driving for a year and ordered him to pay a £260 statutory surcharge and £85 prosecution costs.
According to Eglinton, the driving ban has led to Varga losing his job with DPD. She also noted that he was the main driver for his household and that his wife, a nurse who doesn’t drive, now has trouble making her way to work at a hospital due to poor public transport links at night.
The defence barrister added that Varga is currently without any income as he is yet to claim benefits. She said that he is looking for work in a warehouse and if he didn’t succeed, he would have to claim universal credit. Letters from Varga and his wife also detailed the effect his driving ban and sacking have had on their finances.
The judge accepted that Varga was “remorseful” and that he regretted the crash, for which the driver accepted full responsibility.
This isn’t the first time we have reported on dangerous driving from DPD’s delivery staff.
In September 2022, we reported on the live blog that a cyclist in Oxford told the company to “please train your drivers better” after a tailgating member of staff trapped the rider’s bike under their van, after the cyclist stopped to warn the driver about the dangers of driving too closely to people on bikes.
And in February 2021, a cyclist reported a van driver to DPD after they cut right across their path before immediately tuning right at a junction, but said they received “no reply” from the company.
After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.
Latest Comments
- michophull 18 min 56 sec ago
I'm a lifelong Wirral resident, cyclist, and council tax payer....
- mdavidford 27 min 56 sec ago
Does that mean he had to come back and do a time trial after his 100km of recovery?
- Jem PT 32 min 25 sec ago
We have a Virgin broadband/TV pakage that includes the TNT sports channels. In principle I would cancel but there are 5 other people in our...
- quiff 39 min 39 sec ago
Many times someone has left a gap for me to turn right and then seemed to get irritated when I don't move - then they see the cyclist come past...
- mdavidford 40 min 9 sec ago
Yup. Also Nope. More like one for every three and a half (or two for every seven, if you prefer).
- Paul J 50 min 33 sec ago
Assuming the error in a powermeter has some consistent bias (i.e., does not perfectly cancel out over time), the consistently biased portion of...
- Paul J 1 hour 4 min ago
Yes. Sporza on VRT Max can work with VPN (you may to create an account and guess a Belgian address) - great coverage all year around. NOS has...
- rdaddict 1 hour 6 min ago
Like a lot of cycling fans I am disgusted by the Discovery/TNT price hike, surely the cycling community can come together and put on a united front...
- Rendel Harris 1 hour 9 min ago
You will know more than I about windtunnels (you would have to because you couldn't possibly know less!) but do designers not test their bikes with...
- bensynnock 1 hour 14 min ago
There's the matter of productivity too. If you can achieve the same result - getting from one place to another - for less cost then you have...
Add new comment
12 comments
So ... a legal requirement [and also human decency] is a *defence*?
[Snip]
"In court this week, Varga’s defence barrister Harriet Eglinton said that the delivery driver stayed at the scene of the crash and had called the emergency services,"
[Snip]
While I have some pity for the drivers wife, maybe she could take advantage of other forms of transport... such as a bicycle, bus, car share or even a taxi?
We keep on being told that cyclists should take a test, carry insurance etc. THe Highway Code is explicit in its instruction to both drivers here. How come the formal test of their knowledge and competence did not reveal the gaps? I think we should be told.
Rule 110
Flashing headlights. Only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there. Do not flash your headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users.
Rule 111
Never assume that flashing headlights is a signal inviting you to proceed. Use your own judgement and proceed carefully.
And
Rule 180 (Turning right)
Wait until there is a safe gap between you and any oncoming vehicle. Watch out for cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians and other road users.
Definitely add flashing headlights to the list of things drivers are not prosecuted. Surely, in this case the court confirmed his assertion that the other driver flashed him (possibly dash cam evidence) and therefore they should be prosecuted for Driving without due care and attention. This is the opportunity for a wider educational moment.
I'm surprised we don't hear about incidents like this more often.
Motorists do seem willing to "just let" other motorists across in front of them if there's a queue (or even just to be nice), but the onus is on the motorist crossing (in this case, Mr Varga) to check that the road is actually clear.
There's no obligation on them to even make the manoeuvre - as eBurt says below, the HC says not to wave someone across or flash them, for precisely this reason.
It infuriates me when I'm driving and people just stop to let me out. It's almost never necessary, and because I had assumed I would have to wait until after their car had passed I haven't checked the road for other hazards. So they stop, I have to be sure what they're actually doing, I then have to check both directions twice to be sure there are no cyclists or other road users, then I can pull out. It would have been quicker for me if they'd just carried on.
What's even more infuriating is that I know most other drivers wouldn't do those extra checks, and even if they did see a cyclist would probably just pull out anyway
Many times someone has left a gap for me to turn right and then seemed to get irritated when I don't move - then they see the cyclist come past them on the inside.
An interestingly harsh punishment in current terms.
"......an oncoming motorist flashed their lights to indicate that it was safe for Varga to turn."
Has that driver been traced and charged with being a f**kwit and held at least 50% responsible for the injuries to the cyclist? There's a reason the HC tells you not to give directions to another road user, and to ignore the directions of anyone except a police constable.
Absolutely, I have been very lucky on countless occasions due to activity like this by ignorant motorists some of whom know I'm there. Really pees me off...
The HC does say this but it says a lot of things that no one does because it would make driving on our roads an absolute nightmare. People flash you to tell you that they are letting you go, not to tell you that its safe to do whatever you like. The other option is to just leave the space there until they use it. They won't take any more care if you flash or just leave space. There are plenty of places where cars are meant to leave a gap so as not to block entrance into a side road. People don't take any more care with turning into those roads than they do if someone left a gap and flashed to let them cross.
This isn't an issue with people flashing their lights to tell someone to go, its an issue with the general standards of driving. I have people do really stupid things around me all the time and very few of them are related to anything but inattention or simply awful decision making. I'm not blaming the cyclist in any way here but if I am moving past traffic in a bike lane I make damn sure that I am able to stop if there is any chance of a car turning across into me because I know the drivers sure as hell ain't going to be looking for me.
The way you drive safely is to only perform manoeuvres when you know its safe to do so. If you cannot see very well then you either don't do it or you do it very slowly so you can easily react to things that come into your field of view.
In my experience it's people not obeying the highway code that make travelling on our roads an absolute nightmare. What's the point of having a set of rules and then ignoring the ones you don't like.
The main thing that makes our roads unsafe is not leaving enough time for your journey which the highway code tells you to do.
That's just not true, though. The flashing is generally seen as an invitation, and that creates a percieved social obligation to respond, and do so with minimal inconvenience to the flasher, so the flashee is more likely to hurry the manoeuvre and neglect to take as much care. Whether the flasher intended that is irrelevant - you're told not to do it for a good reason.
And it's hard to see how not flashing "would make driving on our roads an absolute nightmare."