Leading track sprinter Matt Richardson, who shocked the cycling world in August when he defected to Great Britain after winning three medals, including two silvers, for Australia at the Paris Olympics, has been effectively banned from ever representing Australia again, after a review by the country’s governing body argued that the so-called “secret switch” conflicted with the “values of the Australian National Team and the broader cycling community”.
However, the AusCycling review concluded that any attempt to stop Richardson from competing for two years – a complete competition ban that was mooted in the wake of his defection – would be “legally unenforceable”.
The review, published this morning, also revealed that Richardson had attempted to take his Australian team bike and kit to Britain following the Olympics, but before he publicly announced his decision, a move AusCycling deemed an “unacceptable risk” to the squad’s intellectual property.
> Australia’s Olympic sprint and keirin silver medallist Matt Richardson set for surprise nationality switch to Team GB
In August, 25-year-old Richardson announced that he was moving to the Great Britain track team, after his application to switch nationality from Australia was accepted by the UCI.
Born in Maidstone, Kent, Richardson moved with his family to Western Australia when he was nine, maintaining dual citizenship in the process.
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
Since beginning to compete for Australia as a junior, Richardson has gone on to establish himself as one of the fastest men in the world, winning a world title in the team sprint in 2022, along with two Commonwealth golds that same year, before winning silver in both the sprint and the keirin, along with a bronze in the team sprint, at this year’s Olympic Games in Paris.
> Track cyclist who won three Olympic medals for Australia before “secret switch” to Team GB could face two-year ban from UCI, as AusCycling says Matthew Richardson would have been left out of Paris 2024 squad if they knew about defection plans
Following his defection – which AusCycling said was kept secret before the Games from teammates and staff, who only found out a few hours before the official announcement – Australian cycling’s governing body has been investigating the move, publishing its results this morning.
“The review, which involved a thorough investigation of Richardson’s actions, has determined he acted in a way which conflicted with the values of AusCycling, the Australian National Team, and the broader cycling community,” AusCycling said.
AusCycling noted the key findings of its review are as follows:
Richardson requested that the world cycling body, the Union Cycliste Internationale, delay official disclosure of his nationality change until after the Olympic Games. This request was supported by British Cycling.
He also withheld news of his decision from AusCycling, his teammates, and key stakeholders prior to the Games.
After the Games, but before announcing his decision, Richardson asked to take AusCycling property including a custom bike, cockpit, and Olympic race suit to Great Britain. This represented an unacceptable risk to AusCycling’s intellectual property.
As a result of these findings, AusCycling concluded that Richardson will “not be eligible to rejoin the Australian Cycling Team at any point in the future”.
The sprinter is “also prohibited from using any resources associated with the Australian Cycling Team or its partners” and “will be ineligible for any AusCycling-related awards, effective immediately”.
AusCycling also said it “investigated the imposition of a two-year non-competition clause as outlined in Richardson’s athlete’s membership agreement”, but ultimately found that “such a ban was deemed legally unenforceable”.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
The decision by AusCycling not to pursue a general two-year ban means Richardson will be eligible to represent Team GB following the European championships in February.
After missing the track worlds last month, Richardson made his debut for Britain, albeit as an independent rider, at the UCI Track Champions League on Saturday, beating Dutch sprint supremo Harrie Lavreysen in the sprint and keirin.
“I was really trying to soak in the experience,” he said after his GB debut.
“When the announcer called my name representing Great Britain, it was such a special feeling. It’s a dream come true really and to win every single race tonight was more than I could have ever wished for.”
(Alex Broadway/SWpix.com)
Following their review this morning, AusCycling’s performance manager Jesse Korf said: “These decisions underscore AusCycling’s adherence to the values of the Australian National Team and our broader commitment to the principle of Win Well.
“Integrity, respect, and trust are foundational to our team and organisation, and we remain focused on fostering an environment that upholds these standards.”
Add new comment
6 comments
Why don’t cyclists use the cycle paths? #14,902
TBF, many motorists don't leave road junctions clear if they're queuing, so it doesn't surprise me at all that they won't leave cycle lanes clear…
The exact situation shown in this photo is pretty common near me.
This along with ignoring or pushing the various parts of Rule 243 * - only a "do not" not a "You MUST not" so why should people care?
TBF one could forgive the drivers for parking there because while there are cyclists they are sporadic; because the cycle paths (and they are cycle paths, not shared-use) are not as connected as could be. "Great for me" as a "cycle most places" person but they don't even go as far as the nearby supermarket, or join up with the waterfront path at Wardie without requiring sharing road space with big trucks / buses / minibuses, or hopping on and off pavements and using pedestrian crossings.
* (Highlighting just the ones I commonly see and bold those I see the most) DO NOT stop or park:
at or near a bus or tram stop or taxi rank
opposite or within 10 metres (32 feet) of a junction, except in an authorised parking space - pretty standard, off the main road? It's fine...
opposite a traffic island or (if this would cause an obstruction) another parked vehicle
where the kerb has been lowered to help wheelchair users and powered mobility vehicles - who bothers to check?
in front of an entrance to a property
on a bend
where you would obstruct cyclists’ use of cycle facilities - what are they?
Whinging
PomsAussiesHe gave them three medals and now, as is his right, he's moved on. Get over it, Australian cycling federation.
Aye, and he wanted to take Team Oz bike, etc. with him. Really? Is he really that thick that they would have said yes.
The muppet should be sine die'd.
Dame Laura Kenny is going to be one of the Today programmes guest editors over Christmas. https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2024/today-programme-christmas-guest-e...