Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Is there anything that can’t be blamed on cyclists?” Baby hospitalised after motorist crashes into bike hangar – and locals blame the hangar

The storage unit has been removed following last week’s collision, with a parked lorry taking its place

An eleven-month-old baby was hospitalised last week after a driver collided with a roadside cycle hangar – and a local residents’ group has blamed the crash on the destroyed storage unit.

The collision, which we featured on last week’s live blog, saw a motorist drive straight into the back of the green bike container located on Grove Lane in the Denmark Hill area of London, in what the Southwark News reports was the second time a motorist has collided with the unit in just over three months.

Following the crash, which took place at around 2.30pm on 6 March, a woman and an eleven-month-old baby were taken to hospital. No arrests were made and the baby is believed to be fine, though neighbours have told the local newspaper that the child’s mother is “beyond distraught”.

A similar collision, which saw a driver knock the hangar sideways onto the pavement, occurred on the evening of 2 December 2022. No one was hurt.

The hangar has been removed since last week’s collision, with one local cyclist noting on Twitter that, yesterday evening at least, the space it formerly occupied was being taken up by a parked lorry.

While the two collisions may raise concerns about the standard of driving in the area (considering the unit was placed in a car parking space), a local residents’ group has argued this week that the hangar was “dangerously” positioned and have criticised the council for not acting sooner to prevent motorists from colliding with it.

According to the Southwark News, the local council was warned about the hangar’s placement by the Grove Lane Area Residents’ Association (GLARA) soon after it was installed in October 2021.

In that meeting, the group expressed concerns about the sight lines along Grove Lane for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers, with Southwark Council’s cabinet member for leisure, parks, streets, and clean air, Catherine Rose, promising to review aspects of the road layout, including the hangar’s placement.

However, until last week’s collision, the unit had been kept in its initial position, with the original container replaced after it was destroyed in December.

> Council "investigating" after driver outrage at cycle hangar "deliberately" blocking car parking spaces

The complaints about the hangar have also coincided with concerns from some residents that Grove Lane has become “more dangerous” in recent years thanks to the introduction of low traffic neighbourhoods and restrictions in nearby areas.

Anti-LTN activists say these schemes have displaced more traffic onto main roads such as Grove Lane – though analysis carried out by Southwark Council has shown that traffic on the road has fallen by 12.7 percent compared to pre-Covid levels.

Following last week’s crash, a spokesperson for the Grove Lane Area Residents’ Association pointed to the increased traffic on the road in a statement which claimed that incidents involving the bike hangar were “foreseeable”.

“We as residents are ready and willing to work with the council to make improvements to Grove Lane and we want to see the council honour its manifesto commitments to reduce traffic on main roads – because this was foreseeable given it was the second accident on Grove Lane involving the bike hangar in the last three months,” the spokesperson said.

> Hove woman persuades council not to locate “unattractive” cycle hangar outside her home 

The placement of cycle hangars – a growing presence in British cities thanks to the demand for safe and secure bike parking – has become something of a constant talking point in recent months.

In Brighton and Hove, where the council is planning to introduce the units across the city, the hangars have proven a somewhat surprising and enduring source of contention in the south coast city.

With 150 hangars expected to be rolled out across Brighton and Hove in the next few months, and a waiting list stretching into the hundreds, they have proven hugely popular with many residents looking for somewhere to securely store their bikes. However, the units have also attracted the ire of some locals who claim that they are an eyesore and take up too much space, despite the hangars being able to fit in a space usually reserved for one car.

Cycle hangar in Norfolk Square, Brighton (credit - Laura King, Facebook)

[credit: Laura King]

In November, a new cycle hangar in Norfolk Square, one of 60 already installed in the city since July 2022, was met with outrage after residents pointed out that it was hanging over two permit car parking spaces, prompting the council to investigate the hangar’s positioning.

Later that month, a Hove woman successfully persuaded the council not to put one of the new hangars outside her home because it was “unattractive” – leading one councillor to observe that people opposed to them do not seem to have a problem with “Range Rovers that are half parked on the pavement”.

> Residents “threatened with police” after “surrounding” contractors installing bike hangar

And in January, things became even more heated when the council was accused of misleading the public after it claimed that a group of “unhappy” residents “surrounded” contractors tasked with installing one of the new hangars.

According to the council, staff from parking enforcement contractors NSL were in the process of implementing a parking suspension, in preparation for the installation of a second bike hangar on Cissbury Road, Hove, when they were “surrounded by a lot of unhappy residents”.

However, a Cissbury Road resident criticised the council’s account, branding it “misleading”, and claimed that he “had barely gotten a word out before I was threatened with the police”.

But, even in Brighton and Hove it seems, the hangars have yet to be blamed for the inattentiveness and carelessness of motorists driving into them (as far as we can tell).

As one cyclist noted on Twitter this week, “is there anything that can’t be blamed on cycling infrastructure and cyclists?”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
7 likes

If only it'd been wearing a helment and hi viz. Seriously, Grove Lane is in a 20mph zone. If you can't drive down there without hitting something, maybe you should stop driving.

Avatar
JustTryingToGet... replied to OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
4 likes
OldRidgeback wrote:

If only it'd been wearing a helment and hi viz. Seriously, Grove Lane is in a 20mph zone. If you can't drive down there without hitting something, maybe you should stop driving.

Agree with this though would broaden it... regardless of the speed if uou can't get you tin can down the road without hitting a structure, you shouldn't be driving.

Why are people such bellends?

Avatar
ChuckSneed | 1 year ago
0 likes

Pretty crazy for something like this to happen right on the doorstep of a road.cc's reader's wife's flat

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to ChuckSneed | 1 year ago
7 likes
ChuckSneed wrote:

Pretty crazy for something like this to happen right on the doorstep of a road.cc's reader's wife's flat

No need - this is starting to look like harrassment.

Avatar
Backladder | 1 year ago
10 likes

Paint some lights and a numberplate on the ends of the cycle hangar and motorists will mistake it for just another parked car.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Backladder | 1 year ago
11 likes

Or just paint a magic white line around it, that'll prevent any incursion from motorists.

Avatar
ktache replied to Sriracha | 1 year ago
3 likes

Or those thin little triangles on the ground that are meant to make grey street furniture so visible to us on cycle routes.

Tried searching for an image but Google couldn't come up with anything, they are that pointless.

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 1 year ago
0 likes

Genuine question. Does the bike hangar have reflectors?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Bungle_52 | 1 year ago
9 likes
Bungle_52 wrote:

Genuine question. Does the bike hangar have reflectors?

This one certainly did, I made this picture to show someone on Twitter who was claiming it didn't, arrows pointing to reflectors - note also the silver ends. I've cycled past it virtually every night this past winter and managed not to ride into it! 

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
10 likes

There's only one way to stop this happening again:

Avatar
srchar | 1 year ago
3 likes

Mobile phone or distracted by the infant.

Avatar
marmotte27 replied to srchar | 1 year ago
2 likes

Infant on mobile phone.

Avatar
squidgy | 1 year ago
5 likes

I see she skillfully managed to avoid the line of parked cars 20 yards behind , but lost it at the bike hanger.
Only need to spend 5 minutes in the area to know how many awful drivers there are.

Avatar
Brauchsel replied to squidgy | 1 year ago
5 likes

Yep. I live very close, and the number of shit drivers is high. The local specialty seems to be spaced-out inattention rather than speeding, which probably explains this kind of fuckwitted incident. 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Brauchsel | 1 year ago
1 like
Brauchsel wrote:

The local specialty seems to be spaced-out inattention rather than speeding, ...

A.K.A mobile phone distraction. Not sure it's such a "local" speciality either!

Avatar
Brauchsel replied to Sriracha | 1 year ago
0 likes

Funny-smelling smoke coming from these mobiles when the drivers have their windows open.

Not unique to the area, no: I had noticed though that the bad driving round here is of the slow/erratic/gormless variety rather than the suicidal boy racers of my northern childhood. Slow enough that I've been able to harangue plenty on foot for just vaguely drifting into a road I'm crossing rather than indicating etc. 

Avatar
squidgy replied to Brauchsel | 1 year ago
0 likes

Funny-smelling smoke coming from these mobiles when the drivers have their windows open.

or balloons filled with something other than air

Avatar
perce replied to Brauchsel | 1 year ago
2 likes

Most dangerous place round my way is the local retail park. I've never seen so many inattentive drivers and near misses.

Avatar
VIPcyclist | 1 year ago
9 likes

I was under the impression that if I hit a stationary vehicle &c it was my fault. How wrong I was.

Avatar
Safety | 1 year ago
4 likes

It would be good to hear in reporting of these incidents whether either driver was charged. And if so with what. Or is this an example of "it's just an accident let the insurance deal with it".

Avatar
brooksby | 1 year ago
11 likes

The fact that this woman drove her car into a bike hangar... the fact that it was a bike hangar is irrelevant: it was in a former car parking space, so if the hangar hadn't been there then she would have driven into a parked car instead. Clearly driving while "distracted" and it surprises me (okay: not really) that a careless driving charge wasn't invoked.

Avatar
Rome73 | 1 year ago
7 likes

How do you collide with a Cycle hangar that is placed in a parking space and is kerbside? The car must have been hugging the left side and the driver distracted. 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Rome73 | 1 year ago
5 likes

Mobile phone.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
15 likes

And in other news, nobody blames a driver for crashing with an inanimate object, clearly visible for many seconds before the collision.

"It jumped out in front of me" claims innocent, law-abiding driver, wot never did nobody no 'arm ever.  Astonishing that a driver with a baby in the car decided not to pay attention to the road in front of her, but to something else entirely: I'm going for a phone, but it could be anything.

Anyway, it's definitely the hangar's fault and it should be removed and sued for getting in the way of a driver who has right of way over legally parked, visible objects.

I wonder what the level of outrage would be if she had driven into another car, parked in exactly the same place?  No I don't.

Avatar
Off the back | 1 year ago
9 likes

It's obvious, these roaming gangs of inanimate objects are a menace to all road users. 

Avatar
Clem Fandango | 1 year ago
19 likes

Vladimir Putin has just held a press conference about the US drone that was downed over the Black Sea.  Apparently the Russian SU-27 Flanker was an innocent bystander & the Reaper drone just clipped a dangerously positioned cycle hangar.  Happens all the time.

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to Clem Fandango | 1 year ago
8 likes

Apparently there was no car crash, just some Russian soldiers smoking negligently inside the cycle hangar.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Mungecrundle | 1 year ago
1 like

It was an accident although what the cycle hanger was doing next to a 6th floor window just before this is not known.

Avatar
Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
6 likes

That HGV should have its parking lights on.
Another fine demonstration of 'professional' driving.

Avatar
cbrndc replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
0 likes
Oldfatgit wrote:

That HGV should have its parking lights on. Another fine demonstration of 'professional' driving.

In a road with street lighting and a 30mph limit! Not required.

Pages

Latest Comments