A woman in Hove has persuaded the local council not to put a cycle hangar outside her home because it was “unattractive” – leading one councillor to observe that people opposed to them do not seem to have a problem with “Range Rovers that are half parked on the pavement.”
The Environment, Tansport and Sustainability Committee of Brighton & Hove City Council, which has been rolling out cycle hangars across the South Coast city, met on Tuesday evening to approve proposed locations for 11 new structures, including two on St Leonard’s Road in Hove, reports The Argus.
In a consultation last November, seven local residents requested the cycle storage unit, similar to the one shown above, but in more recent consultation on the draft the traffic regulation order enabling them to be installed, six of their neighbours objected.
Among those was Janet Goodlet, whose home is next two the planned site of one of the hangars on St Leonard’s Road.
She said: “How did the council officers take into account the negative and distressing impact a large unattractive structure like the cycle hangar would have on the unfortunate residents living in the house where it is to be located, bearing in mind that the resident will have absolutely no control over this immovable structure?”
She was supported by Conservative councillor Robert Nemeth who, with the backing of Labour councillors, called for the proposal for two cycle hangars to be located on the road to be withdrawn.
He insisted that people living there had access to front and back gardens where they could leave their bikes securely – although as a number of stories here on road.cc show, that is little deterrent to bike thieves across the country.
“I would expect bins and other non-beautiful items of street furniture to be located at the ends of roads when they’re not directly outside anybody’s house. In this instance, these locations have been shunned,” he said.
The council has no overall control, but is currently administered by the Green Party which has 20 of the 54 seats and regained control after the previous Labour administration collapsed in 2020.
One Green councillor, Jamie Lloyd, told the committee: “You do get pushback. You do get people who think these are going to be a huge imposition on their lives while seemingly ignoring the Range Rovers that are half parked on the pavement.
“What is a cycle hangar compared with a car parked on the pavement? People have requested this. They want somewhere safe to keep a bike.”
The committee decided not to go ahead with the two hangars, but approved nine others that will be located in five other streets across the city. Four other streets that had been earmarked for hangars will not now receive them, with the council exploring other potential locations.
As has happened in other places where similar on-street bike storage facilities The cycle hangars, of which there are now 60 across the city, have proved hugely popular with local cyclists and are running at near-capacity, with the council telling road.cc in recent days that all but one of the existing 360 spaces have been taken, and there is a waiting list of around 300 people who want a space.
However, they have proved very contentious issue, with accusations last week that one of the storage units – which have around the same footprint as an average car – had been deliberately sited to take up two car parking spaces.
> Council “investigating” after driver outrage at cycle hangar “deliberately” blocking car parking spaces
The council said it would investigate the location of that cycle hangar on Norfolk Square after it was accused of “incompetence” and was engaged in a so-called “continuing war against motorists.”
The council confirmed to road.cc that it was “aware of concerns” but added that it was “delighted” at the overall response to the storage units, saying that “residents have wanted them for a long time.”
Councillor Steve Davis, who chairs the Environment, Transport and Sustainability Committee, said: “We began with the installation of 20 in July and saw a 100 per cent take-up rate in just a few weeks.
"Since then we have installed 40 more, and all but one of the total of 360 spaces have now been snapped up. This means that 359 residents now have somewhere safe and secure to store their cycles.
“There are also around 300 people on waiting lists for spaces. We are currently looking at more hangar locations. We will have a total of 150 cycle hangars installed by spring of next year – that's 900 cycle spaces in total.
“We know that if we’re to get more people travelling actively and sustainably, we have to give them the right infrastructure,” he added. “Cycle hangars provide people who live in homes with little or no storage space an opportunity to store their bikes safely and securely.”
Add new comment
26 comments
She said: “I am not against cycle hangars being installed on the public highway so cyclists can store their bicycles in a secure location, but I am unhappy with the way the council has decided on its location without any direct consultation with the residents who will be directly affected.
I'm only surprised we didn't get a comment that 'as a keen cyclist myself'
Ah, but maybe some of her best friends are cyclists...
It's the public highway not hers. I can park a rusty 30 tonne tank outside her house if it is licenced and insured.
Our taxes pay for the use of the highway, but do not afford any rights to sections of it, including outside their home.
FFS
I might be the only person here playing devils advocate, but I kind of agree that these fugly bike hangers 'should' be located either in front of peoples homes who've been on a waiting list and have requested them, or the ends of roads or away from peoples front doors.
They are semi-permanent, they will get vandalised pretty quickly and whilst they are needed and absolutley should take car spaces, they are not nice to look at and having that forced upon anyone isn't great. An idea could be to 'move them' up and down the road every six months.. that'd sort of be fair for all and would negate a few of these arguments.
Surely "keep it and add a new hangar in a new spot every 6 months as more people see the benefit of this"?
As to vandalism - that's a thing. They also get hit by cars... but "static things get damaged" doesn't mean "so don't have things which don't move" or "hide all public infrastructure". What about the bins, post boxes, cable cabinets...? Surely "look after road furniture and tackle vandalism", no?
Yes to adding more bike hangers and reducing car spaces! These things are just fugly as fudge. I like the idea of either getting local artists to decorate them OR wrapping them in artwork.
Amazingly - in the place where they have taken cycling seriously and it has been something lots of "regular" people do they've come up with some solutions other than bike hangars - including several kinds of "ninja base" cycle garages that you might walk past without seeing:
https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2017/10/31/home-side-bicycle-parking/
(Now that house prices are officially set to fall might we see some of this here?)
Do you have some numbers?
For example there are 1600+ cycle hangars installed across London. Have many of these been vandalised?
I thought they were fixed down. But in Brighton that big communal commercial dustbins all over a lot of these roads,and those seem to be acceptable - so I'm inclined to think this is mainly frothing.
I'm inclined to think you've missed my point.
The roads in most of Brighton/Hove have parking the full length. The only bits without parking are junctions, and cannot have anything near them.
Also the hangers take 5-6 bikes, you can't just pick a random person, also I imagine many of the requests are from students who will have moved within a year. They are going where they are best suited in general.
If the waiting list is anything like London (50,000+ applicants on waiting lists, waiting times up to four years) I doubt many "here for a year" students would bother applying or get anywhere if they did.
Or commission local artists to decorate them and make them part of the community?
Good idea!
Hove cyclists persuades council to encourage miserable selfish woman to locate herself somewhere else.
Who is up for a crowdfunding campaign to buy a horrid, rusty campervan and park it outside her house, in perpetuity?
Me, me, me!!!
Did anyone see the sidebar link on the Argus article to https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/23132625.brighton-parking-restrictions-e...
"Exasperated"?
The poor residents must be exacerbated.
'Exasperated' because they have to lever their bodies from behind their steering wheel and shuffle at least 25m to their front door while snacking on UPFs and getting an Insta selfie in.
Doesn't want a bike hangar because it's unattractive, but is happy to pose in front of a black plastic wheelie bin for the Argus...
...and her garden wall is an abomination as well.
According to this: https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/cycle-hangars#:~:text=There%20is%20a%20... there is a charge of £1 a week to use the lockers.
Based on that, if you would like to leave a car on the road near your house in Brighton, being charged at the same rate, there would be a charge of around £150 to £200 a week.
Its about time car owners were charged to leave their private property on the public road and £200 a week seems about right. I am sure Ms Goodlet would have no issue paying for such a service.
Well, they often are. Many urban locations are resident permit parking where you need to buy the permit to be able to park. I've no idea how that stacks up price-wise generally but the principle is established at least.
Brighton rates, for high emissions vehicles, are £210-385.
Per year..
Dreadful NIMFY, that woman!
Yes remove twelve spaces because they're 'unattractive'.
Stay classist Hove..