A pit bull owner whose animal escaped a property in Liverpool before "viciously attacking" a passing cyclist riding to work has been jailed for 28 months.
Mark McDuff suffered serious injuries in the attack at around 6am on the morning of June 13 last year and needed surgery and stitches to significant wounds to his left forearm and right ankle.
The court heard that the cyclist suffered "physical" and "psychological" harm during the prolonged attack which began when Mr McDuff saw a large white dog chasing him.
Prosecutor Chris Hopkins said the rider "knew he wasn't going to get away from the dog" when it grabbed his ankle, before chasing him into a neighbour's garden where the attack continued.
As the victim "was doing everything to get it off him shouting for help", the defendant arrived back at the property and "stayed with him" while a neighbour contacted the police.
Judge David Knifton sentenced Shaun Dwyer to 28 months in prison, ordered the destruction of the American pit bull terrier and disqualified Dwyer from owning a dog for 10 years.
In court, Dwyer claimed the house had been burgled, allowing the dog to escape — he had previously pleaded guilty to owning a dog which was dangerously out of control causing injury and to possession of a fighting dog.
The 26-year-old wept as he was sentenced, and the St Helens Star reports he told his family in the public gallery, "I’m so sorry, I never wanted this to happen. Tell the kids I'm sorry. I didn't want this to happen."
Jailing Dwyer, Knifton "disagreed with the suggestion (Dwyer) was a responsible dog owner" and said the victim was "subject to a terrifying attack".
Knifton continued, saying Dwyer had "rather belatedly expressed remorse for the attack. I’m told that you have moved to a more secure address. The address at which the dog was previously kept was insecure."
Dwyer appeared to blame his landlord for the missing fence which allowed the dog to escape, but the judge replied, an "able-bodied 26-year-old would have been 'capable' of putting something in it to prevent the dog from escaping".
The court also heard that Dwyer was allowed to keep the "prohibited" dog in 2013 on the condition it be muzzled and he kept third-party insurance.
Dwyer's insurance expired in April 2020, over a year before the incident, and he said "wow and laughed" when shown a picture of the dog's broken cage during a police interview.
According to prosecutor Mr Hopkins, when police arrived at the scene of the attack the defendant was "agitated" and "told the officer he had nothing to do" with it and refused responsibility for owning the dog.
Judge Knifton "took into account" Dwyer's previous convictions "albeit for offences of a different character.
"A responsible dog owner would have ensured that the third-party insurance was up to date and that the dog remained secured in its place," he told the court.
Add new comment
9 comments
In my experience there is a correlation between the people who say, "My dog" and "My car". There are a lot of people seem to think that they are entitled to own either or both, but have no further responsibilty after that
Poor cyclist and the poor dog having a moron of an owner. If the guy was responsible the dog would still be alive and safe today.
Maybe his time in jail will teach him a lesson.
What a stupid bloke. If he'd have jumped in his car and given the cyclist a few injuries to cover up the bites he would have got away with it!
Sarcasm aside its depressingly telling that the law punishes failure to properly handle something with its own mind (a dog) far more than failure to properly handle a machine that nearly 100% (mechanicals and freaks incidents aside) is entirely dependent on the drivers input.
Especially (not to dimish it, but to contrast) there were 22 deaths from dog attacks 2013-2019 vs ~1400 road deaths* in 2021 alone. Thats what happens when you have a "something must be done" mentality.
*All Road deaths, dont have the breakdown but we know from previous years the majority will be vunerable road users.
There's little world-wide investment in dog ownership and associated infrastructure (parks and litter bins). Meanwhile, there's lots of rich (and thus influential) people, businesses and lobby groups that have made a concerted effort to ensure that car drivers are not sufficiently held responsible for the harm that they can cause.
Wonder how many dogs are killed by motor vehicles? Genuine question, probably less than the thousands of cats and uncounted numbers of other creatures. However could there be a useful intersection between rich people who have influence on motoring and rich people who feel very connected to their pet?
It's their own fault of course. Should have been wearing a helmet /s.
He sounds like a really, really stupid bloke. It might be more appropriate if he was banned from ever owning a dog again. Being chased by a huge American Pitbull would be absolutely terrifying. There's a guy in my local park who has two that he walks off lead and while one is quite docile and slow, the other most certainly isn't. I was riding some laps at the BMX track and his dog started growling at me. I had to tell him to put it on the lead. Big, fierce fighting dogs like that are often bought by the sort of people who are least to be trusted with any sort of animal and they're a danger to everyone around, adults, kids and other pets. I could well understand if the victim took the offender to court to sue for damages later on.
Fack me. Your landlord is responsible for keeping your dangerous dog under control
"I’m so sorry, I never wanted this to happen. Tell the kids I'm sorry. I didn't want this to happen."
No apology to the victim then