- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Near Miss of the Day 669: Cyclist confronts driver after 'worst overtake I've ever seen'
The road.cc reader involved in today's video managed to catch up with the motorist who'd nearly sent him into the hedges on a country lane in Kent, labelling the close pass 'the worst I've ever seen' to the driver before reporting him to the police.
It is one of the many close passes the cyclist has had to deal with over the years, like so many of you, prompting him to film his rides as potential evidence.Â
Kent Police received this footage but only issued the motorist with a warning letter, which the cyclist believes is 'not a very satisfactory result'. What do you think upon closer inspection, does this driver deserve a tougher punishment?
> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country â so many, in fact, that weâve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If youâve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that youâd like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling
Latest Comments
- Steve K 3 min 30 sec ago
Which section of the A34 (there are two, unconnected bits)? Back in 2016-17 when I was riding from London to the North West a lot (for reasons I've...
- ubercurmudgeon 5 min 8 sec ago
To be fair to the Bard of the Wirral, at least he put some genuine effort into his doggerel. It actually represents what his (deranged) soul wishes...
- FatAndFurious 7 hours 35 min ago
I'm not known for my imagination. What are folk hoping to see? We have events, races, leagues, workouts, clubs, free rides, group rides, portals to...
- mark1a 8 hours 54 min ago
No problem at all old chap, its successor the CAAD13 is available in mechanical 105 11sp guise (not too shabby a groupset IMO with Shimano trickle...
- David9694 9 hours 48 min ago
Car crashing into Colchester Co-op sees two hospitalised https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/24719022.car-crashing-colchester-co-...
- Prosper0 10 hours 50 min ago
No offence to Endura, but same advice as to Rapha, I actually have all the kit I need, for probably several years. You need to go and win the next...
- chrisonabike 14 hours 44 min ago
Ah - yes, they've got an American Star the wrong way round (means the child carrier needs rearranged though). Or it could be a Facile but inverted?
- lesterama 16 hours 37 min ago
What a bunch of ases
- quiff 17 hours 30 min ago
It was only your comment in the carousel that first brought me here, and yet I still managed to read most of the page before remembering this isn't...
Add new comment
80 comments
Given the narrow lane, the driver actually had his car as far to the right as he could go and the cyclist did move to the right as the car passed, I've certainly had closer passes where the driver had plenty of room to go wider; perhaps the driver should have given a short toot to alert the cyclist to his presence before passing but then some cyclists would take a toot as aggressive and move to the lane centre..
Or perhaps they should just have waited until they reached a stretch of road that was actually wide enough to safely pass.
If you had read the comments, you would know that the OP said:
"I certainly don't remember moving off line intentionally, but I certainly had a real fright when he started to overtake, I thought there was no room for me and the car and I was going to be hit."
another comment
"The front view does suggest that , however the rear view tells a different story with the rider appearing to move to the left and then back to right, probably in panic at the car virtually on his rear wheel."
When I can't overtake safely I just wait until I can. Never occurred to me to force my way through blaring my horn.
S'funny thinking about those precious seconds of my life that I've wasted in ensuring that I don't bully, intimidate hurt maim or kill people..... well... I must confess I feel a bit stupid now....
and if that doesn't allow for 1.5m in new money (as much space to the cyclist as he would give a car,in lsd;Â where space is the road space the cyclist has, not the gap between them), then the car driver has enough information to know what to do next.
Cyclists will do that; it is one of the reasons drivers should give plenty of room, in case the cyclist has to move out for any reason
You're right, that we should not assume a horn is an aggressive message. However, it often is. Moreover, it would be completely unnecessary in this instance. Does the cyclist not know the car is there? It's not a city centre, the car's engine will be clear enough. The car is behind the cyclist, and his presence there is essentially irrelevant, insofar as the cyclist's duty of care is concerned. Unless he is setting some expectation that the cyclists should move out of his way. We know from the conversation afterwards that the driver had no other significant brain traffic other than to get past the cyclist; and no other expectation than that the cyclist should not be in his way.Â
[the cyclist is not in 'your way'; the cyclist is in 'front of you']
Â
What's the 'i' for then? 'Near miss idiocy of the day'?
Like many other video incidents that highlight inconsiderate, impatient, intolerant or dangerous driving, which I believe motorists need to be educated and punished for, I am always left wondering what action Roadcc, Cycliq or other similar cycling platforms or publications are taking to put pressure on politicians or the police to change the mindset of this dangerous ignorant minority of drivers; Or are these videos simply being used for entertainment purposes to increase viewing figures?Â
I have to say I agree. I posted similar comment some time ago. The fact is that road.cc do nothing to actively use these videos to highlight the problem to the powers that be and have this content just for cheap entertainment. Furthermore these videos attract many visitors to road.cc who are not cyclists and simply come here to troll.
As a keen cyclist who rides 200+ miles a week year round for pleasure, these videos actively discourage me from cycling some days. And they do nothing to encourage others to start cycling. I so often found myelf coming to the site and seeing the only new content to be another close pass video that I now only visit here infrequently. Road.cc should note the effect these videos have had on someone who should in their core demographic.
Â
I dont agree, passes like the one in this video are simply a fact of life for any cyclist on UK roads, if simply watching the videos puts you off riding, what on earth does experiencing this kind of stuff do to you ?
Road.cc publish the videos to highlight that its a problem, rather than blindly ignore it, which is beneficial in several ways, it allows people to debate and offer advice so that we learn from these incidents, how to better to place yourself in a situation, how to handle it better, maybe even identify the potential hazards before they develop, which makes us all better and safer riders.
and it makes you feel like you arent facing this stuff alone, its very easy to be on the receiving end of a close pass and feel like it was your fault, that you were the one that caused it, that you were responsible for it, because riding a bike doesnt come with an instruction manual or guide to how things are meant to be, and unless all your best friends are also cyclists, its not something people really discuss much, or how it makes them feel.
So just seeing someone else riding a bike via a video, in the same way you ride a bike and seeing actually they got close passed just like you did and it wasnt their fault, and it made them feel just like you do, is of great value IMO.
Whilst these videos are uncomforable viewing, I don't think they should be swept under the carpet. There are campaign groups like Cycling UK, LCC etc. that are putting pressure on government. Road.cc is at least publicising the issue, which will help raise the profile of the problem.
Road.cc have contacted police forces for comments in the past and got some useful feedback. They haven't done so for quite a while now and I for one would like to see more of it.
Curious to know more about the purpose of the driver's journey, and was the stop anything to do with the rider? Who else might have turned up if we'd have waited around a bit?đ€
For once, the driver, when confronted, wasn't an all-out gammon.Â
Glad the police at least did something.Â
I thought he was going to be a walker but not in those trainers. Is it a popular dogging location? Asking for a friend đ
Apparently people who have contraband to sell may also do it outside town - or alternative a wholesaler may restock more local vendors.
Ah. I see. There's a couple of country parking area we pass on summer evening walks where we see mainly young people sitting for no apparent reason.
Well I wouldn't want to cast aspersions on people just enjoying doing nothing much outside. However when enjoying the outdoors around the edges of the Leeds-Bradford connurbation we'd sometimes spot folks driving up to remote carparks and stopping but briefly to make furtive exchanges. Mind, there was probably dealing too...
There's no way he can overtake legally on that road. So much for "moving to the left", even IF one were obliged to ride in the gutter. Which you're not - cyclist is maybe 80cm out, normal distance to the road edge, i.e. where the dirt ends.
Never mind the close pass, this idiot should be prosecuted for tailgating the cyclist so close for so long. Is he too stupid to see the hazards; shitty broken road surface, woodland detritus, greasy leaf mulch, a vulnerable road user and a split second's grace? Whatever happened to the "two second rule"?
A stray broken branch in the cyclist's spokes and this driver would be protesting it was an unavoidable freak "accident" (and please, think of the poor driver who will have to live with this for the rest of his life), one of those things.
Didn't see the cyclist coz the sun.
Doesn't need to. No other witnesses - he can just drive home. If tracked down he can say he didn't notice. If challenged further just say he has no memory of the incident. I'd give good odds for an acquittal. Probably could only be charged with failing to stop. The court would see no reason why not, given that the cyclist could have thrown himself under the car, or fallen off after he passed, or have been hit by someone else. Excellent excuses, given that pleading your own incompetence is also a valid defence.
I do wonder what these letters say? Do they stay on a drivers record at the DVLA? What happens if he does it again?
Tbh, these incidents are common place and with those wet leaves to the cyclists left I would definitely be riding in primary until I felt safe to let the car pass. In the conversation the driver exhibits his complete ignorance of the highway code rather than any deliberate maliciousness. There's certainly no sign of empathy.
I would rather the driver was sent for re education. Half a day, at his expense, being taught to see the other side đ should do the trick.
They go nowhere near DVLA. They stay on a driver's record on the relevant police force's database; if the driver pops up again with a similar offence in that force's area then they're more likely to be prosecuted. But no other force will be aware of the letter.
I have sympathy for the police/CPS given the guidance they have to follow before charging and prosecuting. Â If the insurance companies made it mandatory to disclose receipt of such a letter when obtaining or renewing a policy (I would hope that this was already a thing) then that might make people think more before making mistakes on the road. Â Will not stop the true idiots but might educate the 'surely not me' brigade.
I can see little in that vid to suggest the cyclist was being careless, I doubt the police did either, would you care to elucidated your argument?
You're serious? You think your description demonstrates careless driving? Bizarre...
You are replying to a person who has been banned for 2 weeks, changed their username 6 times, lies, makes stuff up and whose MO is to bait and wind people up. Any other site, they would now be a PBU.
Â
Lol. OK, point taken đ.
Yeah, right.
Simplistic nonesense that simple demonstrates your ignorance of objective evaluation. Prehaps you should familiarise yourself with the appropriate literature?
It's unclear what you legal argument is here re Scottish law, you'll need to elucidate you're argument. Prehaps you could organise a legal challenge to test your arguments?
Although, I doubt you'll be successful. I certainly, remain unpersuade by your arguments, thus far.
Stay safe. đ
Hang on, how do you know the cyclist saw the car behind them? If the cyclist never saw the car then your arguement is flawed. The car was also tailgating on the rear camera video and not leaving a 2 second gap to the vehicle (in this case a bike) in front of it.
Pages