At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
If the Daily Hate dislikes Cycling Mikey, he can take that as a positive.
The non-road-tax-paying cyclist came out of nowhere. Would have been more visible with numberplates.
I'm sad that Canondale has lost its direction, stateside. They did not protect their distribution network and Trek is eating their breakfast, lunch...
Couple of questions please... is the peening requirement specific to Campagnolo chains with hollow pins? Is the £180 tool specific to 13 speed...
As well as the tiresome situation of reliable servants being all but impossible to find these days. Reminds me of the statement by the barrister in...
"Athletes will do dumb things to improve performance, that's a given. So it's the organizer of the sport who can slow them down, by simply making...
Teenage boy charged with drink driving after car crashed into telegraph pole...
My dealer even said we could ask for different crank length and chainring sizes if we wanted, so we did. Spanking new Ultegra cranks and rings for...
Thanks....