Ruth Cadbury, the co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Cycling & Walking (APPGCW), has urged transport minister Chris Heaton-Harris to implement temporary protected cycle lanes in towns and cities during the coronavirus pandemic, as has happened in other cities around the world. Her appeal, however, was met with a very non-commital response.
Cadbury, the Labour MP for Brentford & Isleworth, put the question to the minister, whose responsibilities include cycling, in a remotely-conducted transport committee evidence session today.
“We would like to see some encouragement [for cycling], because it makes logical sense in urban areas, to encourage cycling in particular and some of the cycle companies like Brompton have made their services free to essential workers,” she said.
In recent weeks, with traffic levels falling in countries around the world due to restrictions on travel as a result of COVID-19, cities including the Colombian capital Bogota, New York City in the US and Berlin in Germany have all introduced temporary cycle lanes.
> Should we be using roads as emergency bike lanes
And as we reported earlier today, the UK has likewise seen a sharp drop in motor traffic on the roads, accompanied by many people who still have to go into work due to the essential nature of their jobs switching to bikes for their commute to avoid crowded public transport.
> UK road traffic falls to lowest levels in 65 years due to lockdown
Cadbury asked the minister: “There is a suggestion for segregating space temporarily on some roads to create safe space for cycling, whether that’s being considered in the department at the moment?”
Heaton-Harris, the Conservative MP for Daventry, gave what might charitably be described as a non-committal response to the issue of temporary segregated cycle lanes, but reinforced that the government was encouraging people to ride their bikes as part of their permitted daily exercise.
He said: “I’m fortunate to have the cycling responsibilities in the Department [for Transport], and I am very keen that when people take their one exercise a day, if they can, cycling is a very good way of getting good exercise in a relatively short period of time.
“I’ve seen reports both online and elsewhere where local authorities have been considering exactly the proposals that you raise.
“I can’t say that we’ve encouraged that from the centre, but we are absolutely encouraging that if you can make your one exercise a day a not too long, sensible, socially distanced cycle ride, then we would encourage that.”
“And it does give an opportunity for transport for essential workers who may not normally need to cycle,” Cadbury pointed out.
“Absolutely,” said the minister. “And I’m sure that members of the committee would have seen the email from Brompton Bicycles today, they are raising money online to try and get to £400,000 to provide free bicycles to NHS workers.
“We want to encourage this as much as we possibly can,” he added.
Brompton launched its Wheels For Heroes fundraising drive last week and has so far raised more than £125,000 to help it produce an additional 1,000 bikes free for hire for NHS staff.
> Brompton Bike Hire in fundraising drive to make more bikes for NHS workers – here’s how you can help
Add new comment
10 comments
The roads are quiet enough for cycle lanes to be redundant - I'd prefer that things stay as they are, rather than have to stay on the right side of some temporary white line, lest I have some mouth breather tell me to gerrinthefackinbikelane.
But if those lanes were put in now there may be a strong argument for them to remain permanent once this is over.
On our local neighbourhood on line forum there are the usual posts about lost cats, painting and decorating services, yoga classes, occasional rants about the 'council'. And then someone mentions cycles and the whole thing lights up like a Christmas tree. A few days ago someone posted to demand that children stop cycling on the pavement (lots of them are out on their bikes at the moment) Someone even suggested that a child on a bike on the pavement is the equivalent of "assault" on a pedestrian. That comment got lots of likes. If anyone tried to mention any facts the shouting and hysteria is reminiscent of brexit in its full glory.
My village has a NCN route going through it too, so everyone gets very het up about "outsiders" coming through the village on their bikes (at the weekend) and potentially spreading the plague.
I'm still going to work every day (only one in the office and building, so limited exposure risk) - I would prefer to ride in, but my wife banned me and insisted I drive after reading the village FB group and becoming worried that I'd get lynched or something...
(Driving straight from home to the office car park, parking up for the day, then driving straight home. Driving is so booooring...)
How clueless can you get, asked a question that is relevant to workers being able to get to work and answers it as if all cyclists are purely recreational…
If he'd answered the question that had actually been put to him, he might not have been able to shoot the idea down so easily...
Chris Heaton Harris is the nutter who sent the letter to universities demanding to know what academics were saying in their lectures about brexit
(https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/oct/24/universities-mccarthyism-mp-demands-list-brexit-chris-heaton-harris).
He is a nasty reactionary who got the job because he is a committed brexiteer
Most of them did.
Well, now we know what to really make of the radical announcement about cycling last week; it was total BS. Given the opportunity to do something immediately which would cost almost nothing and make a considerable difference, the response is the most mealy of all mealy mouthed statements. Just the usual "we're fully in favour of cycling for all the usual reasons, and for all the other usual reasons, we aren't actually going to do anything about it. Keep driving."
Let's be fair - it must be quite difficult having to pretend that you value cycling when you couldn't give a flying f***.
Seriously cycling wins the debate hands down - congestion, pollution, mental and physical health, affordability, consumption. On every level cycling wins the argument. Best just keep quiet, do f*** all and let the gutter press villify us all.