Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Only one West Midlands cyclist a year charged with red light jumping

Figures contrast with London where red light jumping is seen as a major problem

The Birmingham Mail reports that only three West Midlands cyclists have been fined for jumping red lights in the last three years. West Midlands Police Commissioner David Jamieson has said he will raise the matter with senior officers after it was suggested that the law was not being enforced.

One fixed-penalty notice for failing to comply with traffic signs and signals was given out in 2014/15, two in 2013/14, and none at all in 2012/13. Fines handed out for cycling on the pavement have also fallen from 17 in 2012/13 and seven in 2013/14 to none in 2014/15.

Jamieson said he would speak to senior officers to see whether there was a problem. “Road safety laws are for everyone. All road users, whether they are cyclists, motorists or pedestrians, need to follow the rules. We all share the roads and need to respect each other when using them.”

David Cox, the chairman of CTC, the national cycling charity, contrasted the figures with those for London, where 4,000 fixed penalty notices were handed out for going through on red or ignoring other road signs in 2013 alone.

Cox said that police there had responded to red light jumping being perceived as a major problem by cracking down on it. “Cycling in London is very different to Birmingham and the West Midlands. You often see cyclists in London jumping the lights.”

He also said that the cyclists jumping red lights was less a safety issue and more ‘an act of discourtesy to others’. “There are far more dangerous things on the roads – driving with mobile phones, texting while driving for example.”

Last week we reported how San Francisco cyclists brought traffic to a halt by stopping at every red light and crossing in response to a police crackdown on red light jumping. Riding in single file during evening rush hour, riders approached every stop line as cars must do, coming to a complete halt and only moving forward when they had the right of way – their point being that bikes shouldn't be treated the same as cars as they don't present the same dangers.

Protesters are calling for the city, and California as a whole, to adopt the Idaho Stop law. Introduced in 1982, the law permits cyclists to treat stop signs as give way signs, and red lights as stop signs, allowing them to proceed if the junction is clear. This means that cyclists can clear the junction more quickly and it is said to increase rider safety.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Wolfshade | 9 years ago
0 likes

I am in two minds about this.

It does irritate me that people red light jump, regardless of mode of transport, especially those who enter the ASL, really moped/car/bus/taxi are you really a pedal cycle?

But surely, if a leading cause of incidents is not cyclists red light jumping then Police really shouldn't be bothering to chase and fine cyclists for this as a priority.

The point of most (if not all) road laws are for safety concerns. So if the cost of policing rlj cyclists isn't increasing the safety on road then there seems to be little point to it. It is better to target resources on the things that will create the largest benefits first.

Avatar
ronin | 9 years ago
0 likes

Anyway, you don't catch all the red light jumpers in cars. My advice, take one step at a time and start with the biggest offender (cars).

If the common West Midland cyclist was a serial red light jumper by default, I'm sure there would be more dead cyclists.

Avatar
festina | 9 years ago
0 likes

Traffic lights are made for cars. A number I have come across don't change for cyclists and are only triggered by cars. You either have to wait for a car to turn up to trigger it, use the pedestrian crossing (if there is one) or, if nothing else is around, pass through the red light.

Avatar
Richard D | 9 years ago
0 likes

Most of Brum's drivers are too busy texting to either race or notice a cyclist jumping a red light. Frankly, I always though that it was a bonus when one of Brum's drivers noticed me at all.

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 9 years ago
0 likes

"the law was not being enforced" - ROFL. How many motorists are fined for ASL offences?

Avatar
BikeBud | 9 years ago
0 likes

I don't have a problem with FPN's for cyclist RLJ's. However, I'd want to see West Midlands Police Commissioner David Jamieson focusing on effective policing of truly dangerous behavior such as use of mobile phones and texting whilst driving first.

Avatar
DrJDog replied to BikeBud | 9 years ago
0 likes
BikeBud wrote:

I don't have a problem with FPN's for cyclist RLJ's. However, I'd want to see West Midlands Police Commissioner David Jamieson focusing on effective policing of truly dangerous behavior such as use of mobile phones and texting whilst driving first.

And especially speeding - Brimingham's drivers think the roads are race tracks from what I've seen.

Avatar
shadwell replied to DrJDog | 9 years ago
0 likes

And especially speeding - Brimingham's drivers think the roads are race tracks from what I've seen.[/quote]

And a lot of the cyclists too... weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.......

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

curious, does anyone know how many drivers were fined?

Avatar
bendertherobot | 9 years ago
0 likes

Agreed. That said, if road tax and two abreast are anything to go by it will make very little difference.

The irritating part of this story is that the Commissioner assumes that cyclists are rampaging through lights and not being done for it. It's fine to enforce. As long as everyone gets to feel that enforcement.

Avatar
danthomascyclist | 9 years ago
0 likes

The sooner the UK updates the laws allowing cyclists to safely bypass red lights the better it'll be for all road users.

Latest Comments