- News
- Live blog

“Possibly she is intimidated by the 10 tonne bus which right behind her”: Bus driver criticised for impatiently tailgating cyclist before bus stop, but internet criticises the cyclist; TT day at the Tour de France Femmes + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

Impatience 101?
This might be asking a bit much, but I like it when bus drivers drive slowly. It should be part of the social contract when taking public transport that the person transporting you takes every bit of care to ensure the mass transportation is completed safely and without incident.
Unfortunately, this video doesn’t appear to be observing every precaution. Geolocation is not my strength so we’ll have to limit this footage to ‘London’, but that’s not exactly the main take away here.
Bus drivers: don’t do this.#2SecondRule pic.twitter.com/hkDtJ73yIJ
— Tulse pHill (@PhillTulse) August 2, 2026
A bus driver tailgating a cyclist seems… dangerous? It requires only a modicum of an attention-lapse from either party to cause serious injury for the cyclist. Worryingly, the driver also seems impatient enough to be repeatedly looking to overtake, despite the regular bollards and pedestrian crossings in the road designed to reduce such an incentive, and the rapidly approaching bus stop that would cut off the cyclist if the driver attempted to pass.
Incidentally, I don’t think the cyclist’s behaviour is perfect here, but only because they appear to be riding too close to the kerb and to the parked car doors, making a Remco Evenepoel-style incident more likely, and also motivating the driver to try for a dangerous overtake because they see more of the open road directly in front of them.
But as our original poster identifies in the comments, “possibly she is intimidated by the 10 tonne bus which is right behind her.”
Unfortunately, over on the cesspit of Twitter, social media users don’t seem to grasp this…
“Pull in and let a bus running on a scheduled full of people pass. You are not safe with it behind you, you are holding up many peoples lives. It is not rocket science.”
“Gotta wonder why for their own safety the cyclist doesn’t just get out of the way for two seconds and let the bus go past. It’s not difficult.”
“Bus driver has done no wrong. Peddle faster or pull over. Don’t be a c***.”
“There’s all sorts of great bike infrastructure there, and the cyclists *still* insist on playing in traffic and being a menace to everyone around them.”
“Cyclists are the worst, thinking they own the roads.”
And on and on it goes. To get in advance of what might become a contested topic of discussion, the Highway Code rules drivers should maintain a two-second gap, but that buses and lorries should hold a four-second gap, though that’s harder to maintain on city streets than an A-road. This page also shows a useful chart of all sorts of stopping distances…
Bra-gate
It’s difficult to say what the solution is here. I’m inclined to think that if a woman is willing to wear an extra-padded bra whilst riding in 35 degree heat then they deserve the minor aerodynamic advantage that comes with it.
Then again, if it’s teams that are complaining rather than a snooty person in a UCI shirt, maybe some action should be taken, although any means of investigating the issue quickly becomes a privacy issue of its own…

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
A side issue to the main article, but as morphology means the natural shape of an organism, are we to assume that all riders actually have Darth Vader-shaped heads under those absurd TT lids?
@mitsky “Jahangir told police following Stocks’ death that he would never drive again.” Yeah. I bet he will stick to that. Not. Clearly the correct response from the court to this should be wonderful, we can issue a long driving ban in addition to any other penalty as it won't have any impact on your life.
@kinderje ahhh the old Clarkson defence - "it's just a joke" Cue Stewart Lee bit about Richard Hammond: ‘I wish he had died in that crash and that he had been decapitated and that his head had rolled off in front of his wife and that a jagged piece of metal debris from the car had got stuck in his eye and blinded him. ‘And then his head had rolled on a few more yards into a pool of boiling oil and that his head had retained just enough neural capacity for him to be able to think “ooh, this is bit hot” before the whole thing exploded into tiny pieces.’ Later in the routine, he said: ‘I wish Richard Hammond HAD died and I wish he had been decapitated. Of course, it’s a joke. But coincidentally it’s also what I believe.’
He does appear to have held a range of political views and some of them supported Labour or the left-wing. However, he did seem to be persistently racist and sexist - that was a constant thread through his work.
The magistrate deserves credit for not giving way to all the 'exceptional hardship' claims bollocks
Contrarian, innit? Comprehensive boy with chip on shoulder, righteously angry at cant and bogus authority? Get into big organisations (like the BBC) then do a far-out parody of everything they're uncomfortable with? Or would he really get on with the Tommy Robinsons? (Apparently he claimed to be Labour or further, so guessing not). I am unfamiliar with his oevre and doubt I'd enjoy it any more than reading trolling online ... but just noting *lots* of people in the media were apparently enamoured of him personally, even when he was kicking them in the shins in print. The encomiums do note he had an absolute belief he was right...
@chrisonabike It's curious how most of his "humour" seemed to be about being abusive to minorities and out-groups.
@mitsky "“Jahangir told police following Stocks’ death that he would never drive again.” Yeah. I bet he will stick to that. Not." He didn't, that's why he was caught again. CUK is right, and traffic offences are not viewed or sentenced properly, and it's only when someone is seriously injured or killed that the sentence is appropriate. I've said it before and I'll doubtless say it again, punishment for a first offence of dangerous/inconsiderate driving should be the immediate confiscation of the vehicle for a week: second offence a month, third offence permanent. This would of course be on top of any fines.
She was probably in a panic. Every separate time... Headline might have been "(old) person refuses to change because they've always done it that way".
@jackcycles Never took himself seriously??? He was a pompous pr**k who thought his opinions were worthy of spreading to the masses. It was only when he was proven to be wrong that he fell back on the 'don't take it seriously' or 'it's only banter' line
