An operation by Thames Valley Police in Oxford, which has seen multiple cyclists fined for riding without lights at night, has been met with criticism from residents.
During a one-hour operation, eight cyclists were issued with fixed penalty notices, each carrying a £50 fine. The checks were carried out in Summertown, following a similar operation earlier this winter, which attracted significant reaction on social media.
In a Facebook post, TVP Oxford said: “We were back in Summertown to ticket cyclists for riding without lights on their bicycles at night.
“Throughout the hour of the operation, eight cyclists were ticketed for cycling with no lights on their bicycles. Please be aware that use of a pedal cycle without lights at night is an offence and will incur a £50 fine.”

The enforcement action has sparked criticism on Facebook over the use of police funds.
Tony Brett said that “I disapprove strongly of cycling without lights when it’s dark; however, I have to ask TVP Oxford, and specifically the resource allocator Matthew Barber, if this really is the biggest risk to road safety in Oxford at the moment and thus whether this action is the best use of scarce police resources.”
Emily Pillinger-Avlamis added: “Fine – this is important to send a message that riding without lights is indeed reckless and dangerous. But why not also stop and fine the endless streams of motorists breaking the 20mph limits about Oxford?
“Their dangerous decision-making is far more consequential than that of cyclists riding without lights.”
> 6 tips for cycling at night – don’t let the dark stop you riding
However, other residents welcomed the police action, saying it would encourage cyclists to be safer.
Janet Stone said: “I knocked a boy off his bike, no lights, all in black, it was autumn teatime, so dusk. I stopped, and he got up and rode off.
“I reported it – my bonnet was all scratched and dented. What can you do? I was shaken, and I’m guessing he was ok.”
Andrew Smith added, “I am a cyclist and a car driver. We all know how hard it is driving at night, with dazzling oncoming headlights and potholes everywhere.
“Throw a cyclist with no lights into the mix, and it’s asking for heartbreak.”
Under the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989, it is illegal to ride a bicycle without lights and reflectors between sunset and sunrise. Bikes must be fitted with a white front light, a red rear light, a red rear reflector and amber pedal reflectors.
Similar enforcement and awareness campaigns elsewhere in the UK have proved controversial. Road safety campaigners have criticised some initiatives for “feeding into a victim-blaming culture” by placing responsibility for safety on cyclists rather than addressing dangerous driving.

A 2023 “Be Bright Wear a Light” campaign, launched in 2023 by pro rider Rachel Neylan and endorsed by four-time Tour de France winner Tadej Pogačar and former world champion Elisa Balsamo, was described by Dr Robert Davis of the Road Danger Reduction Forum as “well-intentioned” but lacking understanding of “what’s required to not being hit by drivers”.
More recently, the “Don’t Be Dim, Be A Bright Cyclist” campaign in Spalding, Lincolnshire, launched in partnership with local police and Halfords, has aimed to improve visibility while offering discounts on bike lights.
The campaign, which runs between 21 January and 21 February, aims to “raise awareness about keeping cyclists safe on our roads” by emphasising that “visibility can save lives”.

19 thoughts on ““Is this really the biggest risk to road safety?”: Police force questioned after operation sees eight cyclists fined £50 for riding without lights”
Are you are cyclist, Andrew
Are you are cyclist, Andrew Smith, are you really?
Modern car lights are a
Modern car lights are a menace though and the older you are, the longer it takes for your eyes to re-adjust. I think his comment is fair.
To be fair to the police I
To be fair to the police I nearly hit a cyclist last thursday riding without lights, anything reflective and in dark clothing on an unlit road. Still not quite sure how I saw them.
Given said cyclist was also riding up hill without peddling, I think it safe to assume the lack of working lights wasn’t the only illegality.
On the other hand the week before on my Bompton cycle home, with fully working lights, reflectors, high viz and reflective bits on my clothes, a driver still didn’t see me, and only stopped when I came into contact with their windscreen (just a slap, nothing serious, but anyway…)
I have to take a different
I have to take a different view: how could you not see them?
Somehow, we have come to accept that if we don’t see something, it’s not our fault. The starting point for driving – literally the starting point – has to be that we do not drive into space we cannot see to be clear and beyond our ability to stop within that space.
A cyclist is not invisible. They are just harder to see. So are parked cars, pedestrians, fallen trees, and so on.
If lights are dazzling us, we may need to slow down so we can stop within the space we can see to be clear.
If it’s dark, we may need to slow down so we can stop within the space we can see to be clear.
By your own account, it is not bike lights that make the difference.
None of this removes the requirement or the need for lights. But it does remove the absolution of responsibility that drivers tend to assume.
NickSprink wrote:
You really should be riding with lights, you know, even if you’re planning on hitting other cyclists…
Quote:
Perhaps they could use some of the £50 fine to buy some lights and give them out at the same time. If they did this I may believe they were actually concerned with keeping cyclists safe.
They don’t get to keep the
They don’t get to keep the money.
Let me rephrase that then.
Let me rephrase that then.
Perhaps some of the fine could be used to purchase lights which could then be given to the police to hand out at the same time as issuing the fine.
Would that work?
I wouldn’t say that Durham
I wouldn’t say that Durham Constabulary are the most progressive of forces but a few years ago they would issue the PCN and then rescind it if you turned up to the station with lights fitted on the bike.
In October I was at bike event & they were giving out free ‘be seen’ lights and would fit them too if you didn’t have tools.
If road safety is your aim those measures seem ideal to get long term buy in and keeping people cycling, rather than just hammer someone.
Also Thames Valley Police: a
Also Thames Valley Police: a Sergeant “in a leadership position” caught doing 131mph off-duty and in a private car. No criminal proceedings, found guilty of gross misconduct despite arguing that “his actions were ‘not reckless’ given his training and that the passengers in the car ‘were not put at risk’ given his ‘skill levels and the road situation at the time'”…..given a warning & allowed to carry on with his job as before. https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/25004888.police-sergeant-keeps-job-despite-hitting-131mph-a40/
Then again maybe the idiots with no lights might have learnt something.
Just because they are on a bike doesn’t mean you have to automatically leap to their defence.
Cyclists who ride without
Cyclists who ride without proper lighting during dust, dawn and night time, create additional hazards for other road users, including cyclists and pedestrians. These riders give the cycling community a bad name. Shame on them!
MaxiMinimalist wrote:
What cycling community? Is this like how a drunken speeding driver gives the driving community a bad name?
I have literally no control over whether some random cyclist has lights or not.
In principle, I’m not against police doing an operation like this, but it only makes sense if they do far more operations that catch distracted, speeding drivers or crack down on cloned plates or missing tax or insurance.
More lives would be saved if
More lives would be saved if they did random breathalyser tests on motorists.
Riding at night ?? Just put
Riding at night ?? Just put a set of lights on. It’s not rocket science
You’re right – they’re not
You’re right – they’re not commonly equipped with external lights…
(I don’t think the Space Shuttle had standard aircraft navigation lights, though I believe the Lunar Lander had external lights, mainly to help with docking with the command module).
On the other hand, equipping
On the other hand, equipping your bike with a rocket engine probably would draw sufficient attention to negate the need for lights.
Depends how big. Sometimes it
Depends how big. Sometimes it seems there’s smoke without fire: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_0UOaBVy61E&pp=0gcJCTMBo7VqN5tD
But you might get yourself *heard* at least: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WlMh9SOPvGk
I don’t understand any
I don’t understand any cyclist not having lights on a dusk and at night, even if only for self preservation. I look like a Christmas tree when I ride, because I don’t want to give a cager any excuses. No problems with the fines, as long as they don’t start looking to fine for those stupid amber pedal lights when you have flashing lights on the bike.