- News
- Live blog

“Everyone knows I won”: Drama at cyclocross champs after winner disqualified for deviating sprint + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

Cyclo-Crossed wires
Maybe road.cc isn’t the best place to write this, but off-road.cc just doesn’t have the space for the racing gossip and drama that the road live blog has so here we go: Cyclocross is so often more dramatic than road racing.
Maybe it’s the mud, maybe it’s the whiff of alcohol and pumping techno music, maybe it’s the racing which often takes place at night, or maybe it’s the sense of aggro that can be generated by a battle for a corner, as Cameron Mason found out courtesy of Michael Vanthourenhout last week…
Or, if you’re Marie Schreiber, it’s a sprint a deux in which a commissaire once again got a toothcomb out.
The 23-year-old Luxembourger appeared to have clinched the biggest win of her career with victory at the European Championships, over Lucinda Brand of all people, only to have been judged to have impeded her rival’s sprint. Have a look for yourself…
Brand, to her credit, didn’t celebrate on the podium, but the ceremony was boycotted by Schreiber who was furious with the decision, as was her coach, former cyclocross supremo Sanne Cant.
“The UCI, the UEC and everyone advocate for clean and fair sport, then they do this. It’s not fair,” Schreiber told the assembled media in the mixed zone afterwards.
“Everybody knows I won. If it had been decided by two centimetres, I can understand, but like this, it’s disrespectful.
“It’s a sprint after 50 minutes of all-out racing, you come with a heart rate of 190. I changed my gear and I saw I moved a little bit to the left but I think it’s normal to move around. I did not close the door on purpose. Lucinda also said it. I think it’s disrespectful to steal the biggest moment of my career.”
“Lucinda said I did nothing wrong and that she couldn’t have passed anyway. I’m thankful she said this but it doesn’t change the commissaire’s decision.”
“I was going to go to the podium because I thought everyone would hate me if I didn’t go. But then if they’re being like this to me, I also don’t owe them anything. It’s hard to stand here right now, so it’s harder to stand on the podium.”
Sour grapes? The footage shows Schreiber moving over to Brand’s left, causing the Dutchwoman to briefly swerve and pause her acceleration but it doesn’t seem as though she lost the momentum that suggested she was close to drawing level.
The wonders of writing about this on Monday is we now have all the quotes amid the settled dust…
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Baloise verzekeringen – Het Poetsbureau Lions (@baloise.poetsbureaulions)
On Instagram, Brand reiterated that “Marie Schreiber was the best rider today and deservedly crossed the finish line first. That is also what I told the jury, in my opinion she did nothing wrong in the sprint. I don’t feel like this European title is mine.”
Schreiber meanwhile was defiant, posting a picture of her winning celebration across the line, captioning the day “the biggest moment in my career”.
Countless teammates, rivals and compatriots have joined in with messages of support in the comments, honestly too many to mention.
Two bits of info have since come to light. One is the Luxembourg cycling federation has filed a complaint with the European Cycling Union appealing the commissaires’ decision. I suspect they will be told that the commissaires have the power to judge as they see fit and it’s not the job of burly fellows in offices far away to decide these things, but the effort of writing the complaint is worthy of note.
The second is that the commissaire ultimately responsible for Schreiber’s disqualification just so happens to be the same judge who disqualified Schreiber’s SD Worx teammate Lorena Wiebes from the Giro d’Italia for a bike that was 20g too light. If you remember that, the team weren’t very happy with that decision either and also led to threats of legal action.

It’s all the drama Mick, I just love it…
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@Zermattjohn This is one reason I loathe policing in our society. Illegal drugs cause no more (probably less) harm through their use than do alcohol and tobacco. The continuing war on drugs does itself cause enormous medical, social, economic and financial harms - many addicts refuse to seek help because of the real fear of being reported to the police, for example, and there might be less incentive for addicts to steal our bikes if they are enabled to manage their consumption.
@Rendel Harris How secure is it to keep a bike outside in a yard or front patio, for example? I'm not sure I'd be willing to do so, no matter how good the lock. It would mean covering the bike(s) with a waterproof material and attaching the bike securely to something solid fixed to the ground or the wall. Not ideal, and hardly an attractive prospect for people who aren't sold on cycling yet.
@chrisonabike That's interesting. I agree; cycling has long been abandoned by most people as an uncool, childish or geeky means to get around. Plus, as Jaymack observed, humans naturally prefer warm, motorised vehicles rather than pedal power.
@This Wreckage Whilst I agree of course that for some people bicycle storage is a problem (personally, with four bikes (two mine, two hers) in a one bedroom flat, albeit a rather spacious one, I think bikes as a wall decoration are second only to bookshelves), 78% of dwellings in the UK are houses or bungalows, most of which will have some outside space front or back, so that can't be a really major factor in the low take up of cycling. The *perception* that there's not enough room might be quite influential and that's a bit of a chicken and egg situation, people are only likely to bewilling to readjust their living space or look for innovative storage solutions to keep bikes if they use them regularly and enjoy it, but they are not likely to use them regularly and find out they enjoy it unless they already have a bike at home.
@Dodonline Look up "Induced Demand" adding capacity does not work.
@chrisonabike ...have impersonated Dutch bike shop owners, people with disabilities, and possibly different genders / sexualities. And have gone from broken English to perfect fluency in a week or so Only a few of us remember those hilariously inept impersonations!
@belugabob Unfortunately going down this route is likely to be a missed opportunity. "Safer streets" can be done in a way that allows access to a virtuous circle with whole suite of benefits. But ... that would mean following something like in NL. So "sustainable safety" - a different philosophy of transport, plus gradual infra and organisational changes over decades. Generally opportunities for concentrations of money beat that. So it looks like we'll get "probably safer on average" but with who knows what side effects, while concentrating insane amounts of power (money) in the hands of a very few. And those will be effectively unaccountable, being almost all overseas, and not having to live in the same streets as their products (they may be flying)...
@Fursty Ferret "...regulator" That should be little comfort, because during previous scandals it became clear that in many cases the regulators were easily hoodwinked, or (especially US) they rely on the companies themselves to mark their own homework. (And in the case of SUVs/light trucks, I heard the US government has been hard a-lobbying the likes of Europe and the UK for "reciprocal recognition" e.g. to accept their product as is without further checks). Needing the makers to help / do the checks is even more likely given the complexity of self-driving vehicles. I suspect self-driving vehicles will likely soon be safer on average than human drivers (a low bar). Of course I think other potential consequences are also a matter of concern (not least - in *theory* humans can be held accountable, but holding humans in large companies accountable for their tech is a *lot* harder)...
@mdavidford Celebrity traitors with Lance? Worse - some of these slippery lycrist quislings deceive people that they're a) pedestrians - by getting off their bike and b) drivers - by getting into their cars! It's all on display in this forum, where IIRC such cyclists have appeared under multiple names, have impersonated Dutch bike shop owners, people with disabilities, and possibly different genders / sexualities. And have gone from broken English to perfect fluency in a week or so...
Politician in "fixing things for my mates / companies I have an interest in" shocker!