Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
I did just wonder about the seat post. Hit a pothole or uneven ridge and it could be nasty.
Quite possible. I’m a heavier rider (100kg) and have broken 3 saddles on the mountain bike and bent an alloy seat post. The bike shop suggested a stronger and longer seat post to replace it, which just ended up cracking the frame!
This is my concern too. I’d
This is my concern too. I’d take the broken spokes as a warning that the whole bike is unsuitable for the rider’s weight.
edit:
From a quick google, most road bikes have a rider weight limit around 125kg. Mountain bikes a bit more at 135kg.
In this weather, it can
In this weather, it can prevent the tarmac from melting in the sun.
It improves grip? (after weeks of 20mph skid risk signs and stone chipped windscreens)
Yep, I did wonder if the same
Yep, I did wonder if the same response would be given for a member of the public. But perhaps in this case, the verbal abuse beforehand makes the intent easier to prove, so it meets the evidential threshold for an assault charge.
Whatever the reason, it’s good that they’re taking some action.
To be fair to Ashley Neal – I
To be fair to Ashley Neal – I don’t think he apportioned minimal blame on the driver at all. He made a point of saying motorists have a greater duty of care and mentioned the upcoming highway code updates. Drawing on his own driving without due care conviction years ago.
These analysis videos are not really about apportioning blame – they’re more about learning defensive driving/riding techniques and improving anticipation.
No matter what’s written in the highway code, there will always be crap drivers/riders that you’ve got to watch out for. A competent driver/rider will anticipate and accommodate the failings of others in order to avoid a collision.
Yep, I don’t agree with all
Yep, I don’t agree with all of the updates. I responded to the consultation and suggested adjustments regarding the passing distances and situations where you would adopt a primary position.
The bit about giving priority to cyclists going straight-ahead seems quite clear to me and (I think) a useful addition.
Rule 180 refers to turning
Rule 180 refers to turning right, so not applicable in this case.
Hopefully this slight ambiguity will be cleared up with the upcoming updates to the highway code. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-the-highway-code-to-improve-road-safety-for-cyclists-pedestrians-and-horse-riders
If the third bullet point gets implemented, then Mr Neal will be talking total bollocks.
edit: dug around and found the wording…
Rule H3: Rule for drivers and motorcyclistsYou should not cut across cyclists going ahead when turning into or out of a junction or changing direction or lane, just as you would not turn across the path of another motor vehicle. This applies whether cyclists are using a cycle lane, a cycle track, or riding ahead on the road and you should give way to them.
Do not turn at a junction if to do so would cause the cyclist going straight ahead to stop or swerve, just as you would do with a motor vehicle.
You should stop and wait for a safe gap in the flow of cyclists if necessary. This includes when cyclists are:
approaching, passing or moving off from a junction
moving past or waiting alongside stationary or slow-moving traffic
travelling around a roundabout”Yep – not a good look. He
Yep – not a good look. He could probably argue he wasn’t staring at the camera, but diligently checking his left mirror for cyclists approaching up the inside
!what I found annoying was his comments about the cyclist “not necessarily having priority”.That made me flinch too – but he’s kind of right. It’s not clear-cut, that’s why there was this ‘turning the corner’ campaign a while ago.
Rule 183 says you must give way when crossing a cycle lane – but at the junction, the cycle lane has gone – there are no lane markings for straight on across the junction, so there’s an argument that this rule doesn’t apply.
Rule 182 is more general for left turns, but doesn’t say you must give way, just ‘watch out for’, which is a bit non-committal on who has priority.
As it’s not technically a
As it’s not technically a motor vehicle, I guess you don’t need a license, insurance, tax or MOT – totally legit.
Thanks, the slightly bigger diameter is quite attractive, might give that a goI thought Sriracha’s mirror photo was quite good, so I’ve taken one of the B&M, with a still from thre rear Fly6 camera for comparison…
I was mulling over your point about a mirror reducing an adrenaline spike and I think you’re spot on with that. It buys that little bit of time for a better chance of making a considered response, rather than an emotional reaction.
I have this exact setup, but
I have this exact setup, but the 60mm B&M mirror, which is almost identical to the cateye and also recommended. Field of view is good with the convex lens, no vibration, stays put but still easy to tweak the position by just moving it if needed.
I’ve had a couple like this
I’ve had a couple like this over the years, so can sympathise. One saw me hang the bike up for 6 months and the other 9 months. Back on it now though and cameras every ride.
I try not to react to these incidents now, but it’s tough if the adrenaline puts you in fight/flight mode. Even raising a hand or shaking your head in disapproval risks escalating the situation and you really don’t know the state of mind of the person you are dealing with.
One of my coping strategies is to be hyper aware of all that’s going on, using a mirror to keep tabs on vehicles approaching from the rear. Trying to predict poor driving and feeling like I’m more in control if I was expecting it. Submitting only the worst incidents to the police, for what it’s worth.
It’s rarely constructive replying back to any verbal abuse. You’re unlikely to end up in a civilised debate or change their view/behaviour in that moment. They’re looking for a reaction, so don’t give them one.
The dvla already know who the keeper is but you can’t ask them who it isoh yes you can!
you need a good reason for doing so, but anyone can ask for details of a car’s owner based on the licence plate.
Sounds like you need a gravel
Sounds like you need a gravel bike – no need to swerve, just plough right through it!
scratch that – we need to campaign to make these ‘ass bags’ compulsory!!
!