HoarseMann

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 554 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • HoarseMann

    Yep, I did wonder if the same

    Yep, I did wonder if the same response would be given for a member of the public. But perhaps in this case, the verbal abuse beforehand makes the intent easier to prove, so it meets the evidential threshold for an assault charge.

    Whatever the reason, it’s good that they’re taking some action.

    in reply to: Left hook video on YouTube #981591
    0
    HoarseMann

    To be fair to Ashley Neal – I

    To be fair to Ashley Neal – I don’t think he apportioned minimal blame on the driver at all. He made a point of saying motorists have a greater duty of care and mentioned the upcoming highway code updates. Drawing on his own driving without due care conviction years ago.

    These analysis videos are not really about apportioning blame – they’re more about learning defensive driving/riding techniques and improving anticipation.

    No matter what’s written in the highway code, there will always be crap drivers/riders that you’ve got to watch out for. A competent driver/rider will anticipate and accommodate the failings of others in order to avoid a collision.

    in reply to: Left hook video on YouTube #981585
    0
    HoarseMann

    Yep, I don’t agree with all

    Yep, I don’t agree with all of the updates. I responded to the consultation and suggested adjustments regarding the passing distances and situations where you would adopt a primary position.

    The bit about giving priority to cyclists going straight-ahead seems quite clear to me and (I think) a useful addition.

    in reply to: Left hook video on YouTube #981581
    0
    HoarseMann

    Rule 180 refers to turning

    Rule 180 refers to turning right, so not applicable in this case.

    Hopefully this slight ambiguity will be cleared up with the upcoming updates to the highway code. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-the-highway-code-to-improve-road-safety-for-cyclists-pedestrians-and-horse-riders

    If the third bullet point gets implemented, then Mr Neal will be talking total bollocks.

    edit: dug around and found the wording…

    Rule H3: Rule for drivers and motorcyclists

    You should not cut across cyclists going ahead when turning into or out of a junction or changing direction or lane, just as you would not turn across the path of another motor vehicle. This applies whether cyclists are using a cycle lane, a cycle track, or riding ahead on the road and you should give way to them.

    Do not turn at a junction if to do so would cause the cyclist going straight ahead to stop or swerve, just as you would do with a motor vehicle.

    You should stop and wait for a safe gap in the flow of cyclists if necessary. This includes when cyclists are:

    approaching, passing or moving off from a junction
    moving past or waiting alongside stationary or slow-moving traffic
    travelling around a roundabout”

     

    in reply to: Left hook video on YouTube #981577
    0
    HoarseMann

    Yep – not a good look. He

    Yep – not a good look. He could probably argue he wasn’t staring at the camera, but diligently checking his left mirror for cyclists approaching up the inside !

    in reply to: Left hook video on YouTube #981575
    0
    HoarseMann
    a1white wrote:
    what I found annoying was his comments about the cyclist “not necessarily having priority”.

    That made me flinch too – but he’s kind of right. It’s not clear-cut, that’s why there was this ‘turning the corner’ campaign a while ago.

    Rule 183 says you must give way when crossing a cycle lane – but at the junction, the cycle lane has gone – there are no lane markings for straight on across the junction, so there’s an argument that this rule doesn’t apply.

    Rule 182 is more general for left turns, but doesn’t say you must give way, just ‘watch out for’, which is a bit non-committal on who has priority.

    in reply to: Honda Civic powered by a tandem? #981383
    0
    HoarseMann

    As it’s not technically a

    As it’s not technically a motor vehicle, I guess you don’t need a license, insurance, tax or MOT – totally legit.

    HoarseMann
    Captain Badger wrote:
    Thanks, the slightly bigger diameter is quite attractive, might give that a go

    I thought Sriracha’s mirror photo was quite good, so I’ve taken one of the B&M, with a still from thre rear Fly6 camera for comparison…

    I was mulling over your point about a mirror reducing an adrenaline spike and I think you’re spot on with that. It buys that little bit of time for a better chance of making a considered response, rather than an emotional reaction.

    https://road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/Screenshot 2021-06-10 at 12.19.35.png

    HoarseMann

    I have this exact setup, but

    I have this exact setup, but the 60mm B&M mirror, which is almost identical to the cateye and also recommended. Field of view is good with the convex lens, no vibration, stays put but still easy to tweak the position by just moving it if needed.

    HoarseMann

    I’ve had a couple like this

    I’ve had a couple like this over the years, so can sympathise. One saw me hang the bike up for 6 months and the other 9 months. Back on it now though and cameras every ride.

    I try not to react to these incidents now, but it’s tough if the adrenaline puts you in fight/flight mode. Even raising a hand or shaking your head in disapproval risks escalating the situation and you really don’t know the state of mind of the person you are dealing with.

    One of my coping strategies is to be hyper aware of all that’s going on, using a mirror to keep tabs on vehicles approaching from the rear. Trying to predict poor driving and feeling like I’m more in control if I was expecting it. Submitting only the worst incidents to the police, for what it’s worth.

    It’s rarely constructive replying back to any verbal abuse. You’re unlikely to end up in a civilised debate or change their view/behaviour in that moment. They’re looking for a reaction, so don’t give them one.

    HoarseMann
    hirsute wrote:
    The dvla already know who the keeper is but you can’t ask them who it is

    oh yes you can!

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/v888-request-by-an-individual-for-information-about-a-vehicle

    you need a good reason for doing so, but anyone can ask for details of a car’s owner based on the licence plate.

    in reply to: Horse poo – annoying and/or dangerous? #980285
    0
    HoarseMann

    Sounds like you need a gravel

    Sounds like you need a gravel bike – no need to swerve, just plough right through it!

    scratch that – we need to campaign to make these ‘ass bags’ compulsory!!

    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000255804142.html

    in reply to: Health thoughts – stamina gone #979619
    0
    HoarseMann

    Your body is fighting

    Your body is fighting something off, so take it easy.

    I would say that negative covid tests don’t necesarily mean you haven’t got/had it, just that there wasn’t much viral load in your throat/nose when the tests were done.

    Our family had it late December, and only my wife had a positive test. The kids and I came back negative – but pretty sure we all had it. I had mainly a headache and stomach upset, but my wife had a temperature and cough, kids just a slight headache.

    I really suffered on the bike afterwards. Had made real gains in Oct/Nov, but it flattened me. After our 2 week isolation period, I tried a bike ride and felt awful, no power in the legs at all. I was reduced to doing short, slow laps of the local park – which is pan flat. I gradually built up the riding, making sure I didn’t over do it and now getting the miles in. Took about 8 weeks of recovery looking at my stats.

    That said, I don’t think the GPs are as busy as you think – if it’s concerning you, then do make an appointment.

    https://road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/Screenshot 2021-04-29 at 16.29.12.png

    HoarseMann

    Probably something like this,

    Probably something like this, you can ask for a wider range cassette as an option on the build and it will take 28mm tyres

    https://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/ribble-r872-disc-anthracite-shimano-105/

    in reply to: Apple AirTags #979415
    0
    HoarseMann
    Secret_squirrel wrote:
    Carbon I would expect no probs

    Carbon fibre is electrically conductive and will attenuate an RF signal.

    I’m thinking somewhere like epoxy bonded to the inside of the right crank, under the chainrings covered with a bit of black tape? Or stuffed up the steerer tube from under the fork crown? Maybe someone will make a security stem cap that could fit one…

Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 554 total)