Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
Ok, I’m in. This is my team,
Ok, I’m in. This is my team, for anyone who studied the startlist will see what I’ve done 😉Daniel Moreno
Samuel Sanchez
Alessandro Ballan
Borut Bozic
Enrico Battaglin
Koen de Kort
Robinson Eduardo Chalapud
Carlos Alberto Betancur
Matteo RabottiniI had another team lined up that had Gilbert and J-Rod, but it seems far from the races claims. They are not riding 😕
The riders entered for the 98th Gran Piemonte include: Philippe Gilbert, Christopher Froome,
Joaquin Rodriguez, Samuel Sanchez, 2011 winner Daniel Moreno, Italian national champion
Franco Pellizotti, Diego Ulissi, Alessandro Ballan and Daniele Bennati.The first three rider’s aint going to be in the race :B
This might do it
This might do it StrathYes he said he could prove it
Yes he said he could prove it in SA. But didn’t say ONLY in SA. Considering the show is broadcast in SA. I think that’s a fair comment.If it was a UK show, He might have said that he can prove it in the UK.
But maybe the fact he’s going to SA soon with Robbie McEwen, David Millar and Pat McQuaid. He meant he can prove it while he’s over there?
Depends on which ranking you
Depends on which ranking you use.UCI Ranking
WIGGINS Bradley 601
RODRIGUEZ OLIVER Joaquin 592
BOONEN Tom 410IG Index
WIGGINS Bradley 4964
BOONEN Tom 4532
RODRIGUEZ OLIVER Joaquin 4311CQ Ranking
RODRIGUEZ OLIVER Joaquin 2986
WIGGINS Bradley 2687
BOONEN Tom 2202Personally, I prefer the way IG do their calculations and think its a truer reflection 😉
Are you talking about this
Are you talking about this part?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJz4kwm9mXc&feature=player_detailpage#t=762s
Where does he say he can only prove it in South Africa??
On the interview as a whole. I think Phil is just airing what we all are saying.
Who are the witnesses? What deal are they getting? Why is it being chased now?
I also liked how he commented on the statute limitation. Because the limitation is normal 8 years within WADA’s rules.
Tygart said USADA is fully entitled to act beyond the eight-year statute of limitations normally applicable within the framework of the World Anti-Doping Code.“This right no longer exists once the prosecution manages to prove that the athlete who cheated influenced the witnesses who could have proved his guilt during these years,” Tygart said. “We are certain that this happened (with Armstrong) and we will explain this to the UCI when we give them the file.”
SO not only have they got witnesses to the drug use/dealing but now they also have witnesses who were “influenced” to keep quiet about it……
My guess is they have now been “influenced” to speak out about it.
As for your assumption Rumpo that I still believe Armstrong to be innocent. I’ve never said that. I will wait until all the facts are out before making any judgement and not jump on the band-wagon that you and others have.
Unless you have read all the evidence against him as held by USADA. How can you make an honest judgement as to his guilt?
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Yes, he’s been “found” guilty by USADA because he refused to fight it anymore, in my eyes, that doesn’t make him guilty. I’ll wait until all the facts are out in the open.
What has he said thats wrong
What has he said thats wrong in this interview??I can’t wait for the UCI and other agencies to get the full facts and rule on it. Bored of speculation
This would be the type of
This would be the type of stuff you are looking forhttp://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/CarPlan-Stick-Spray-Adhesive-400ml-/150743670251#vi-content
True. I never though of it
True. I never though of it that way. BUT, I still don’t think Pat McQuaid is at fault for everything that happens in world cycling and doping issue’s.He is responsible for what goes on in the UCI though. I don’t think he’s doing such a bad job with it.
The teams and race
The teams and race organisation’s don’t really lose out either. Plus the rider can profit through the likes of book deals.The reason no-one really loses out. MOST sponsors of teams and races are in one form or another related to cycling. Examples being bike and clothing manufacturers, component makers and cycling retailers.
If one was to drop out, lets just say because of doping, there is going to be another company willing to come in.
So for example. Team Kam (the riders being myself, drheaton, stumps and Pat McQuaid) 👿
Stumps is caught doping X( and we lose our bike sponsor (Specialized) along with SRAM for our parts. But because we are a world tour team, there are many companies offering us their products. Pinarello and Shimano come and give us new stuff.
Stumps gets a two year ban, No problem. We just bring in another rider. He goes on to write a best selling autobiography. Then returns and we go on to support him and win all the grand tours after his ban. 👿
The person who started this
The person who started this thread did not create the petition.So myself, drheaton and stumps are part of the problem……along with Pat McQuaid the four of us are 100% responsible for the UCI and all the doping problems that go along with it 👿
When the four of us leave, cycling will be cleaned up forever :B
I notice the petition is now
I notice the petition is now closed 👿I don’t even want to look at
I don’t even want to look at what I’ve got, had a agony ridden but enjoyable century on a fixie tt bike today.WHY did I not listen to myself. EVERYTIME the world’s has been held in Holland its been won by a Belgian or an Italian :”(
EDIT: I did listen and went for van Avermaet
Most of the story
Most of the story herehttp://redkiteprayer.com/2012/09/the-explainer-why-slapping-paul-kimmage-wont-work/
There won’t be anymore
There won’t be anymore commentary from me as I’m off out 🙁 Gonna miss the rest of the race.Team One
Greg van
Team OneGreg van Avermaet
Joaquin Rodriguez
Peter Sagan
Simon Gerrans
Jon Tiernan-Locke
Juraj Sagan
Jonathan Castroviejo
Rinaldo Nocentini
Gianni MeersmanTeam Two
Joaquin Rodriguez
Daniel Moreno
Samuel Sanchez
Alejandro Valverde
Jonathan Castroviejo
Moreno Moser
Jon Tiernan-Locke
Lars Petter Nordhaug
Hayden Roulston
