Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Pirelli P Zero SmarTube



Extremely light and gives a very comfortable ride – worth the extra expense and repair faff if you puncture
Ride comfort
Packs small
Specific patch kit required for repairs
Care needed when installing
Single valve length

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Pirelli P Zero SmarTube is the lightest in its range of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) inner tubes. It is exceptionally light, just 39g on the Scales of Truth, improves ride comfort, and provides better puncture resistance than lightweight butyl tubes. If you are unfortunate enough to puncture, though, a repair is a little more involved.

Using TPU for inner tubes is claimed to increase toughness, gram for gram, and reduce volume – and rotating mass – and while the cost might seem incredibly high for a tube, if you're looking to save weight then the grams saved per pound ratio stacks up well.

> Available to buy at local dealers, find your nearest here

The use of TPU has been growing gradually since Foss brought the technology to the cycling market in 2012; it's been joined by Tubolito, arguably the market leader now, and more recently Schwalbe, releasing its Aerothan late last year.

Pirelli's TPU SmarTubes come in three model areas to cover road, gravel and mountain biking. The Cinturato, for gravel and wider road tyres, is available in four sizes covering 28-45mm tyres and in 650B and 700C wheel sizes; the Scorpion, for mountain biking, comes in three sizes and for 27.5in and 29in wheels; while the P Zero SmarTube on test here is for road riding, and comes in just a single size designed to fit 23-32mm tyres.

Within the Cinturato range, there are certain versions that are classed as reinforced, adding a slight weight penalty but still lighter than an average butyl inner tube. The 28-35mm reinforced version could be an option for road bikes and those looking for a more robust tube than the P Zero version, while still being significantly smaller than a standard butyl inner tube.

The P Zero has a valve length of 60mm (as do all the Cinturato models) and the valve core is glued in, so if you needed a longer valve you'd need an external extender.

Both tubes tested weighed 39g each, making them 4g heavier than the claimed 35g, and they can be used with both rim brakes and disc brakes.

The tubes are from the first batch produced and have "Do not repair" printed on them, but this advice has since changed. Pirelli now says that TPU patches, such as the Tubolito patch kit, are effective and safe. One thing to bear in mind, though, is that a patch can take up to 30 minutes to cure and the process is different to a standard tube – best done at home rather than out on a ride. It isn't possible to use either a normal vulcanised rubber patch or a self-adhesive patch.

2021 Pirelli P Zero SmarTube

To test the tubes I used them to replace a pair of Tubolito inner tubes. The biggest difference is the colour, with Tubolito featuring an orange TPU material and valve, whereas the Pirellis are yellow with a plain black valve. Otherwise, they're incredibly similar – same font, same valve style, both are made in Austria, and the weight is almost identical – so it would be reasonable to assume they're made in the same factory, perhaps to a different thickness and specification.

I used the tubes within Pirelli P Zero tube type road tyres and installation was simple, which was a relief. As I found out when testing the Schwalbe Aerothans, the thin material can be caught and punctured during the process. The tyre/wheel combination used meant no tyres levers were needed.

Comfortable ride

While ride comfort might not be the biggest selling point for Pirelli, for me it's the most noticeable difference on the bike. It's more comfortable than with butyl tubes at the same tyre pressure, and similar to latex tubes in their ability to slightly mute road imperfections – but without the gradual air loss and fragile nature of latex tubes. Air loss over several weeks was minimal, a few psi at the very most.

I tested the tubes using a set of 40mm deep-section rims, so there was sufficient valve outside for easy inflation with a track pump, but the threadless valve design meant the valve rattled on my wheels. It's not an issue unique to Pirelli, and will depend on the exact rim and setup used, but you can get specific parts to prevent this, or use a few wraps of electrical tape on the valve itself.

While testing I haven't had any punctures, which is pleasing. In my experience with TPU inner tubes, they don't rip or tear like butyl tubes when punctured, with slightly slower air loss as a result; even when inflated out of the tyre, the puncture doesn't tear the material, which can happen with both lightweight butyl and latex tubes.

TPU or tubeless?

While the low weight is easy to measure in comparison with butyl or latex inner tubes or a tubeless setup, one area that is far more complicated is rolling resistance; tests have been carried out, but there are too few independent ones currently available to make a definitive and conclusive judgement, and Pirelli makes no claims on this.

And while tubeless adds weight – once you factor in the different tyre requirement, tubeless valve and sealant – where it can win over any inner tube material is the ability to run lower pressures, for improved comfort and, particularly off-road, for better grip, while still offering puncture resistance.


Paying £27.99 for an inner tube will no doubt put off many, but when compared to even a lightweight 90g tube that might cost £4 or £5 it's a pretty cheap way of saving some weight from your bike compared with upgrading your wheels or groupset, for example.

They're on a par with other TPU tubes: the Tubolito Roads are exactly the same price (or £29.99 for the S-Tubo Road), while the Aerothans are slightly cheaper at £24.99 each.


Overall, the improvement in ride quality, low weight and possible improved puncture resistance compared with a lightweight butyl tube make these worth considering, and while they are expensive, it's a pretty cheap way to reduce weight.

The biggest hurdle to overcome is the potential of a puncture, with the tubes requiring a specific patch kit, and the time it takes making roadside repairs less viable. The minimal space they take up in a saddle pack or pocket is appealing, but I'm not sure I'd want to rely on one as my only spare.

If tubeless isn't something you wish to consider, though, the benefits of TPU inner tubes might be worth it – if you can get over the initial cost.


Extremely light and gives a very comfortable ride – worth the extra expense and repair faff if you puncture test report

Make and model: Pirelli P Zero SmarTube

Size tested: 700x23/32

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Pirelli says:

P ZERO™ SmarTUBE is the most advanced inner tube in our range. It was designed to match the need for lightness and handling of professional World Tour riders and its first application was inside the P ZERO™ Race Tub SL. It is now also available for every amateur cyclist

The standard butyl inner tube has been replaced with TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane), an advanced plastic material characterized by elasticity and mechanical strength. The result is an inner tube that can be up to 70% lighter, up to 50% more compact and as resistant against punctures as an equivalent tube made of butyl

P ZERO™ SmarTUBE is the ultimate evolution for the cyclists that are still using the standard clincher setup and want to improve the performance of their bikes as well as those who are looking for a light and compact spare tube for tubeless-ready tyres.

Compatible with disc and rim brakes

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Pirelli lists:

Size : 700x23/32c, 60mm valve

Weight : 35g

Valve type : Presta

Valve colour : Black

Material : TPU

Compatibility : Disc and Rim

Rate the product for quality of construction:
Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:

First-generation tubes were printed with "Do not repair" but specific TPU patches can be used.

Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)

An improvement over butyl tubes, and on a similar level to road tubeless.

Rate the product for value:

The same price as Tubolito standard tubes, and a little more than Schwalbe Aerothans.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

The tubes are light and performed well while riding. I was fortunate not to suffer any punctures while testing.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

The improved ride feel and comfort over butyl tubes.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

If – or when – a puncture does occur, you need a specific patch, and cure times are long.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on

The Tubolito Road inner tube is identically priced at £27.99, and Schwalbe's Aerothan is £24.99.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Maybe

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Potentially, if they're looking to save weight or reduce space for a second spare tube.

Use this box to explain your overall score

Overall, I think these tubes are very good. Yes, they're expensive, but the cost for the weight saving makes them a worthwhile option if that's your concern, and they can be repaired if you puncture. The biggest benefit for me, though, above the weight saving, is the improved ride – worth the extra money and the extra care when installing.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 35  Height: 168  Weight: 62

I usually ride:   My best bike is: Cannondale SystemSix

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, cyclo cross, sportives, mtb, Lots of gravel style riding

Matt is an endurance nut who loves big rides and big events. He's a former full-time racer and 24hr event specialist, but now is also happy riding off-road on gravel bikes or XC mountain bikes and exploring the mountains and hills of Mid Wales.

Add new comment


Max Cinelli | 2 years ago

I've been using the Tubolito tubes with 80mm valves for the last 2 years with Campagnolo Bora Ultra AC3 50mm rim brake wheels and I haven't had a single puncture, they haven't lost much pressure and the ride is sublime paired with Pirelli P-Zero velo 23mm tyres which expand to 25 with the 24mm internal rim on the Bora.  Sure expensive to buy but great value in the longrun and super light. I would buy them again without hesitation  

froze | 2 years ago

$40 for a single tube?  you all are freaking nuts!!  This expensive bicycling stuff has gone too far, they think that cyclists are super rich people...or they think we're a bunch of morons and will believe anything they tell us and we'll smile and spend the money while they go laughing to the bank.

Sheen wheels | 2 years ago
1 like

The review says they can be used with rim or disc brakes, but there's a large warning in the photo saying rim only.

ShinyBits replied to Sheen wheels | 2 years ago
1 like

I don't think it's a warning message, it's more of a positive confirmation - as certain TPU tubes are not recommended for use with rim brakes, but these can be.

Mathemagician | 2 years ago

While ride comfort might not be the biggest selling point for Pirelli, for me it's the most noticeable difference on the bike.

I'd like to see claims like this backed up by some actual scientific testing...i.e. a blind test. Sorry but the idea that you can tell the difference between 2 different inner tubes on otherwise identical setups (same bike, same wheels, same tyres, same pressures) seems more than a little far fetched.

Sriracha replied to Mathemagician | 2 years ago
1 like

Yup - inner tubes, perhaps the one bike item where blind testing is a realistic proposition. You'd have to ask why they don't jump at the opportunity denied to them for so long.

check12 | 2 years ago
matthewn5 replied to check12 | 2 years ago
check12 wrote:

Just buy latex instead £14 -

I paid £21 each* for my Tubolitos and they've been a huge success. Dropped 150g off my 'best' wheelset. The road feel is great. They hold air much better than butyl - and don't need pumping up every 2nd day like latex tubes.

*From a certain large tax-avoiding river.

check12 replied to matthewn5 | 2 years ago

You'd have saved some weight going for latex but better rolling restance too, I pump before every ride anyway so no difference for me 

Latest Comments