Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon 2021



Fast and fun thanks thanks to a great frameset and impressive spec list – especially for the money
Impressive frameset
Good components
Strong value
Tyres are not the most supple

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon retains its excellent frameset for 2021, but it's now bedecked with an even better groupset for a wider, 11-gear spread. It only boosts the already great versatility, and it's ripe for longterm upgrades.

> Buy this online here

> Find your nearest dealer here

Mat tested the previous version of this bike back in 2018 and was very impressed, and now I've ridden the 2021 version I can see why. It's brilliant!

At the heart lie Boardman's C7 frame and fork, which use the same aerodynamic design and geometry as the rest of the SLR range, albeit here with a different grade of carbon fibre.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon.jpg

This sacrifices a tiny bit of stiffness around the bottom bracket, although you're only really going to notice when you're absolutely smashing the pedals in a sprint or taking on a power climb. For 99% of riding it's not an issue.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - bottom bracket.jpg

It's a comfortable frameset to ride, which could be a byproduct of that tiny bit of extra flex. Either way, I did a couple of long rides – four hours or so – on the 8.9 and it's a smooth ride. There's no harshness to speak of, and I found the riding position well thought out.

I could get a relatively stretched aero position, with a decent drop from the saddle to the bar, that wasn't too extreme to hold for mile after mile.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - riding 2.jpg

This makes it a quick and efficient bike to ride, especially as the front end geometry is on the lively side of neutral. Technical descents can be taken at speed, not only because of the planted feel, but also thanks to the stiff fork and rigid, tapered head tube and steerer.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - head tube.jpg

Feedback is also good, so you get a good sense of what the bike is doing while you're scanning ahead for the next apex or hazard.

The Vittoria Zaffiro Pro G2.0 tyres do mute that feedback a little, so an upgrade here can make a big difference to the overall ride feel. On the whole, though, the SLR 8.9 is a fun bike to ride as hard and as fast as you like.

Frame and Fork

It's not as aerodynamic as some frames out there, but Boardman has designed the 8.9 to cheat the wind (a bit), although those benefits increase with the addition of deep-section wheels. As I was also testing the Edco SIX-4 wheelset, I bolted them on – and the 8.9 transformed into a very quick bike, boosted still further by a bit of weight loss.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - rim.jpg

The Boardman's tube profiles have been dictated by CFD (computational fluid dynamics) and subsequent wind tunnel testing. Each tube flows from one to the other and the internal cable routing means that surface stays smooth and clean.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - seat tube junction.jpg

The majority of the frame is quite boxy and chunky for stiffness, but the dropped seatstays are pencil-thin – it's a big help with comfort. Putting the joint so low allows a bit of flex both in the tube and the seatpost, which helps take the sting out of the rough surfaces.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - rear brake.jpg

Tyre clearance is limited by the calipers, so you can't go mad like you can with a disc-equipped bike, but the Boardman still takes 28mm tyres. If you want to use the (discreet) mounts for mudguards, you can still get away with 25s, too – the 8.9 is pretty versatile.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - front brake.jpg

This is a bike that works very well as a fast winter trainer or year-round quick commuter/club run steed.


The SLR is available in four sizes, covering a recommended height range of 170cm to 195cm. We got the medium, which has 555mm top tube, 160mm head tube, and a 500mm seat tube. The key angles are 72.5° for the head tube and 73.5° for the seat tube.

All of this gives a reach of 567mm and a stack of 387mm, meaning a ratio of 1.46. That puts it more towards the race end of the spectrum than endurance.

Finishing kit

The previous model came with a ten-speed Tiagra groupset comprising a 50/34T chainset and a 12-28T cassette. For 2021, the SLR 8.9 jumps up to Shimano's 11-speed 105, albeit mated to an FSA Gossamer chainset.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - crank.jpg

It's still a 50/34T, but the cassette with its extra sprocket now offers an 11-30T spread, which gives you a little bit extra at both ends of the range. Shifting from the R7000 derailleurs and gear levers is crisp and precise; it's one of the best groupsets out there for performance versus cost.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - cassette.jpg

To facilitate the mudguards, Boardman has fitted Tektro R315 long arm calipers. They don't quite have the same bite as a set of 105 calipers, but overall, I was pretty impressed. They gripped tight even before the rims and pads could bed in, which isn't always the case.

Speaking of wheels, Boardman provides their own SLR rims on Formula hubs and double-butted stainless steel spokes. It's not an exciting wheelset, but it is tubeless-ready, and robust too. Hammering around local roads clipping potholes here and there has caused no reliability issues.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - fork.jpg

They aren't the lightest, which saps energy if you spend a lot of time in urban areas pulling away from a stop, but it's less noticeable out on the open roads. Long term I'd be looking at an upgrade to something lighter, and with a bit of an aero edge to exploit the frameset, too.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - front hub.jpg

Continuing the 'not the most' theme, the Vittoria Zaffiro Pro G2.0 25mm tyres aren't the most supple, but they are durable and will keep you rolling through all four seasons. Grip levels are decent, and while I'd also upgrade here eventually, it's not a must-do straight away.

> 44 of the best road bike wheels — reduce bike weight or get aero gains with new hoops

Boardman has tweaked the contact points for 2021, going narrower at the front and reducing crank lengths. Bar width on this medium is just 400mm, 20mm narrower than you'd generally expect, but I like it – a narrower bar makes the steering feel slightly quicker, and that certainly keeps the Boardman feeling lively.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - bars 1.jpg

Most bikes of this size get 172.5mm cranks, but the 8.9 wears 170mm long versions. These changes aren't just for the sake of it, either: Boardman took data from hundreds of bike fits, and insights from bike fit experts, to tweak it.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - stem.jpg

Has it worked? I can ride five different bikes a week, so my position has become a bit 'ballpark' instead of specific, and I must admit the shorter crank length didn't feel any different to me. The Boardman branded alloy components all do a decent job, anyway. I found them comfortable, and the 120mm bar drop makes the lowers easily accessible to most.

2021 Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon - saddle.jpg

The SLR saddle is good too – I got on with it fine, and never really noticed it, to be honest. I like the length, which allows you to shift your position around a bit, and the padding is firm enough that you sit on it rather than in it.


A carbon frame (a good one at that) is quite rare at £1,000, especially one sporting the majority of a 105 groupset. But that's exactly what Boardman has achieved.

The big rivals, such as Giant's Contend SL-1, typically come with a very similar build but an aluminum frame instead. It's not a problem for the Contend, as it is a very good alloy frame, but if you really must have carbon you need to look elsewhere.

> 13 of the best 2020 road bikes around £1,000

Ribble offers its R872 in both disc and rim brake guise. The cheapest rim brake model is £1,099.99 and gets you a carbon fibre frameset, albeit with a 10-speed Tiagra groupset instead.


The Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon remains a top-level contender for bikes around the £1,000 mark, especially with with its new upgraded groupset. The frameset is high upgradable too, pleasingly aero and also very versatile.


Fast and fun thanks thanks to a great frameset and impressive spec list – especially for the money test report

Make and model: Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon 2021

Size tested: Med/55cm

About the bike

List the components used to build up the bike.


Frame: C7 Carbon - Aero-Optimised

Fork: C7 Carbon with tapered steerer

Headset: FSA Orbit C-40 ACB, 1 1/8' - 1.5' Tapered, Integrated.

Bottom bracket: FSA BB-CF86/CZ Pressfit for MegaExo Chainset


Chainset: FSA Gossamer Compact 50-34

Front mech:Shimano 105 braze-on

Rear mech: Shimano 105 11 speed

Shifters: Shimano 105 2x11

Brakes: Tektro R315, long arm

Cassette: Shimano CS-R7000 11 speed, 11-30

Chain: KMC X11


Saddle: Boardman SLR

Seatpost: Boardman Alloy, 27.2mm

Stem: Boardman Alloy, 31.8mm clamp

Handlebar: Boardman Alloy, 31.8mm clamp, 70mm reach, 120mm drop

Bar tape: Boardman Soft-grip

Pedals: Toe strap road, 9/16'


Wheels: Boardman Alloy Tubeless Ready

Hubs: Formula RB-51 front, RB-5711 rear

Spokes: Double Butted Stainless Steel, Radial front, 2X rear

Rims: Boardman Tubeless Ready 28h front & rear

Tyres: Vittoria Zaffiro Pro G2.0 folding, 700x25c

Tell us what the bike is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

Boardman says, "The original SLR 8.9 Carbon was our most popular carbon road bike, and for good reason. We think the light, stiff and comfortable carbon frame designed with aerodynamic tube profiles and features is a perfect platform for all-round road riding, and the reviewers agreed with us. For most bike brands, 4.5 out of 5 reviews and comments like 'Blimey, what a corker!' ( would be a reason to kick back and celebrate a job well done. However, at Boardman, we are always looking for ways we can push our bikes to the next level, and this is what we have done for the new SLR 8.9 Carbon."

This is a very competent race bike that also has the versatility to run full mudguards.

Where does this model sit in the range? Tell us briefly about the cheaper options and the more expensive options

This is the only carbon fibre, rim braked model in the SLR range, although there is an alloy framed 8.6 and a titanium 9.6 at the top of the line-up.

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

The frameset looks and feels high quality.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

The frame and fork use Boardman's C7 grade carbon fibre.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

The geometry gives quite an aggressive ride on a bike which is race orientated. Full geometry tables can be found on Boardman's website.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

Very typical for this size and style of bike.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

Yes, comfort is impressive.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

Yes, on the whole the SLR 8.9 has plenty of stiffness for hard efforts and fast riding.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

Power transfer is pretty good, although improved markedly by lighter wheels.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so was it a problem?


How would you describe the steering? Was it lively neutral or unresponsive? The neutral side of lively.

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

Fast enough handling to enjoy the technical descents, without the steering being so fast it becomes twitchy.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

The saddle offers decent comfort and there's a small amount of flex in the seatpost.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The majority of the components offer plenty of stiffness, though there is a hint of flex at the rims.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's efficiency? would you recommend any changes?

The increased range of gears makes the bike more efficient at both ends of the cassette.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
Rate the bike for acceleration:
Rate the bike for sprinting:
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
Rate the bike for climbing:

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
Rate the drivetrain for value:

Tell us some more about the drivetrain. Anything you particularly did or didn't like? Any components which didn't work well together?

As much as I'd like to see a matching 105 chainset for aesthetic purposes, the groupset works well as a whole.

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels for performance:
Rate the wheels for durability:
Rate the wheels for weight:
Rate the wheels for comfort:
Rate the wheels for value:

Tell us some more about the wheels.Did they work well in the conditions you encountered? Would you change the wheels? If so what for?

The wheels are pretty solid and have the bonus of being tubeless ready too. Something lighter really transforms the bike, though.

Rate the tyres for performance:
Rate the tyres for durability:
Rate the tyres for weight:
Rate the tyres for comfort:
Rate the tyres for value:

Tell us some more about the tyres. Did they work well in the conditions you encountered? Would you change the tyres? If so what for?

Just like the wheels, they are durable but the bike deserves something faster rolling.


Rate the controls for performance:
Rate the controls for durability:
Rate the controls for weight:
Rate the controls for comfort:
Rate the controls for value:

Tell us some more about the controls. Any particularly good or bad components? How would the controls work for larger or smaller riders?

A decent package all round.

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes

Would you consider buying the bike? Yes

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes

How does the price compare to that of similar bikes in the market, including ones recently tested on

Many £1,000 bikes from Giant and Specialized come equipped with similar spec lists, but with alloy rather than carbon frames, should that be an issue.

Ribble's R872 carbon offering is similar at £1,099.99 and comes with Tiagra.

Rate the bike overall for performance:
Rate the bike overall for value:

Use this box to explain your overall score

With this SLR 8.9 you're really getting a lot of bike for the money. But it is not just the value that impresses – the frameset and pretty much everything else is very good, and highly upgradable.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 42  Height: 180cm  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: This month's test bike  My best bike is: B'Twin Ultra CF draped in the latest bling test components

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, fixed/singlespeed,

As part of the tech team here at F-At Digital, senior product reviewer Stu spends the majority of his time writing in-depth reviews for, and ebiketips using the knowledge gained from testing over 1,500 pieces of kit (plus 100's of bikes) since starting out as a freelancer back in 2009. After first throwing his leg over a race bike back in 2000, Stu's ridden more than 170,000 miles on road, time-trial, track, and gravel bikes, and while he's put his racing days behind him, he still likes to smash the pedals rather than take things easy. With a background in design and engineering, he has an obsession with how things are developed and manufactured, has a borderline fetish for handbuilt metal frames and finds a rim braked road bike very aesthetically pleasing!

Add new comment


Elite67 | 3 years ago

Good bike.


Rosst1986 | 3 years ago

Shame it's still got the over engineered seat clamp design of the last version. Nothing adds excitement to a ride like wondering if your seat post is gonna collapse at 35mph.

RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

I find it hard to believe that in a review where the product is spoken about so positively and highly praised sees two points lopped off because the reviewer didnt like something that can easily be changed/swapped out to suit ones own personal preference. 

It seems extremely extremely nitpicky 

The tyres not being supple should be a passing comment not something to mark it down for. 

reviews are supposed to be impartial. Not biased.

I would give it a 9/10 because of Tektro brakes - ive had them on my old Triban 540 and they were absolutely useless.

NZ Vegan Rider replied to RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

The bike needs to be reviewed as delivered whether parts can easily be changed or not.

":absolutely useless." - what a stupid comment. If they were you most likely wouldn't be here to comment. I've had them and though they not as good as Shimano they work fine.

Excellent bike - great value, good to see as sensible, fast, good looking rim brake machine  3

RoubaixCube replied to NZ Vegan Rider | 3 years ago
NZ Vegan Rider wrote:


":absolutely useless." - what a stupid comment. If they were you most likely wouldn't be here to comment. I've had them and though they not as good as Shimano they work fine.

I almost wasnt. So i swapped them out for a pair of Shimano R650s. Ive had too many close calls with the tektros and swapping out the brake pads didnt help much

TheFamilyDog replied to RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

Agree..rode the previous version of this bike for a week in Greece, along with my son. The brakes were always a major concern for both of us on what would otherwise have been great descents. I upgraded the following week to a bike with full Ultegra.

The rest of the bike was fine and a great value base to build on..but those brakes - no way - despite a lot of adjusting.

kevvjj replied to RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

Apparently a "brilliant" bike only scores 8/10...

NZ Vegan Rider replied to kevvjj | 3 years ago

Agreed. "brilliant" would deserve a 9.5.

OnYerBike replied to RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

1) It is possible to read a review and make up your own mind based on the review as written - you don't have to take the "star" score verbatim (indeed it would seem evident that you have in fact read the whole thing!). IF you try to boil a bike down to a single number, it's always going to be hugely subjective.

2) This review is for a bike, not a frameset. It is sold as a whole bike that you could ride out of the store if you so chose. I think it's fair to review the bike as a whole and therefore deduct points if certain components are letting the bike down. This is particularly true when the positive aspects of the bike strongly depend on it's value for money - it's no longer a £1,000 bike if you then spend another £300+ on wheels (or another nearly £1,000 for the Edco SIX-4's mentioned...) and another £100 on tyres.

fenix replied to OnYerBike | 3 years ago

It does look like a great bike. And for just a grand. By comparison the wheels he put on were £989 and reviewed as good value for money.

They got 8/10 as well.

Maybe I'm tight but almost a grand for a wheelset ? Compared to a whole bike for a fraction over ?

Should have got a higher score I think. Tyres are consumables so they'll get swapped out anyway. You can't complain much if you need to double your spending to get a wheelset to improve the bike.

I'm tempted myself for my next bike. Get this and look out for a second hand set of flash wheels as people switch to disc brakes.

wycombewheeler replied to OnYerBike | 3 years ago

But for value at £1000 you have to accept the wheels wil always be budget. Tyres are a consumable and will be replaced anyway regardless of quality. The reviewer states they are fine for now, not something that must be replaced straight away.

Personally I would be looking to replace the chainset and bottom bracket as I had FSA gossamer on a previous bike and was never impressed, and the tektro brakes. Again cost of the bike should be considered in the rating, 8/10 suggests they are better options available at the price point, I would like to know what they are.

I would rather bikes not be supplied with mid range wheelsets, either high end or budget otherwise you are left with wheels that you still want to upgrade but are too good to ditch.

Latest Comments