At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
There are a lot of people out there who seem to think exactly that. It's like all those times that the traffic lights change as you are halfway...
Good, because it really is a poor choice....
Erm... "Caecilius est in horto."
How do you drive along with a bike jammed under the front of your car and (supposedly) not notice?
Is the headline not misleading. when the stock was purchased at 3 million in the fire sale with estimated 80 million at retail and blown out for...
No, you're not missing anything. I've just re-read the original article and I clearly just presumed they would hand in their licence…
That still annoys me about the BBC - iplayer only keeps some programmes available for a short time, so we have to rely on people making copies to...
The point of limited-run models like these isn't to make a profit. It's a marketing exercise to get the brand in the media via filler articles that...
Seems like a flaw. I wonder who decided that? Surely it's in everyone's interests to come up with an agreement that a portion of the car-park be...
Don't forget the hour record!...