At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
They're also aiming for a powerless workforce that can be exploited by those that have money. The ideal is for workers to die early so that they...
'Transcendental' ones too - we don't need any of that woowoo stuff. The Pi is a lie!
All my bikes have 170s, because that was standard in the 60s, 70s and beyond. I am now only 5' 9", so I suspect that I ought to have shorter ones....
Shirley shum mishtook as that is just a drivetrain "lubricated" with one of the "lubricants" "tested" here a while ago and given an OK. Mirk-up...
Hear hear. I entirely understand why those who currently drive their kids do so (and I was once a grumpy kid irked by the fact that my parents...
Remind me, again: how much floodwater is absorbed by a resin-sealed tarmacced driveway…?
Guess that depends on your definition of 'works'.
Well it appears Velogames isn't overly good at getting races up too quick either. ...
1981 Raleigh brochure on EBay - a missing link in the catalogues available on line. Bidding starts at £35. ...
It's probably in Romania by now, or Poland, but a picture would certainly help, size too?