Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Spa Cycles Nidd Leather Saddle



A great quality leather saddle at an incredible price - if you don't mind investing some time to break it in.

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

Spa Cycles has brought out a range of three leather saddles at a distinctly more wallet-friendly price-point than their Brooks counterparts: the Wharfe to Brooks' Swift, the Aire to Brooks' Swallow, and the saddle here: the Spa Cycles Nidd to Brooks' B17.

The Nidd's dimensions are almost identical to the B17's with a length of 277 mm, a width of 168mm and a height of 65 mm, though at 623 grams on our scales it's a bit burlier than the B17's claimed 520 grams. At £35, it's also a heck of a lot cheaper.

There are more similarities with the Brooks equivalent: you get saddle loops and the usual nose-bolt to tighten the saddle up once it's started sagging excessively - use sparingly.

Unlike Brooks, the Nidd has a woven synthetic material bonded to the underside - I'm guessing that this helps manage stretch. It also possibly protects the leather from road spray, though I would avoid getting the saddle too wet - that would be a good way to ruin it. You see many randonneurs keeping a plastic bag stuffed between the rails and the saddle for this very reason.

I own a Brooks Swallow and a Swift, so that is what I am comparing the Nidd against. I was always warned that leather saddles take about 500 miles to break in, which I've found to be a bit of an exaggeration for the Brooks; they were pretty comfy and springy from day one - though it's only fair to say that both the Brooks have titanium rails and are therefore, so I'm told, more comfortable earlier.

The Nidd not so much. It was rock-hard when I picked it up from HQ and though you can just about detect some give after 250 miles, comfortable is not (yet) how I would describe the saddle. This long breaking-in period is almost certainly a function of the thicker leather that is used compared to Brooks saddles, the upside of which is that the saddle should last a lot longer - provided it's taken care of properly (disclaimer: I am not a leather expert!)

That is not to say that I don't like the saddle. The shape actually suits my behind better (on my touring bike) than the Swift and Swallow that I own - it is much wider and therefore offers more support in a more upright position. While the saddle is hard, it is not painfully so for my one-hour-long commutes. I think persevering with the saddle will reap rewards in the form of a saddle that's just right for me - eventually.


A great quality leather saddle at an incredible price - if you don't mind investing some time to break it in. test report

Make and model: Spa Cycles Nidd Leather Saddle

Size tested: Brown

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Spa cycles bill it as "Our touring saddle, made from Australian cowhide on high quality chrome plated cro-mo frames."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Width (at widest point): 168mm

Length: 277mm

Weight: 629g

Rate the product for quality of construction:

Looks really well made and finished - as good as a Brooks.

Rate the product for performance:

As the leather is thicker than Brooks, it is heavier and takes longer to break in. This one isn't comfy yet.

Rate the product for durability:

With the extra thick leather, these should outlive most mortals.

Rate the product for weight, if applicable:

20% heavier than the equivalent Brooks - less than half the price though.

Rate the product for comfort, if applicable:

Once broken in, I'm sure that like my Brooks, this will be a comfy perch. I haven't got there yet though.

Rate the product for value:

A quality leather saddle for £35 that will last a lifetime; can't say fairer than that.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

It worked well, but go easy on the distance for the first 500 miles.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

The price, incredible value, without giving up any quality as far as I can tell.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

The long breaking in period. Mind you, the flip-side of that is better durability.

Did you enjoy using the product? I'm starting to enjoy it, now that it's starting to break in.

Would you consider buying the product? Probably not, the long breaking in period is a bit of a showstopper for me.

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes, but I would caution them about the breaking in period.

Anything further to say about the product in conclusion?

Great choice if you're looking for a quality, durable leather saddle and don't want to fork out Brooks prices.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 32  Height: 1.78m  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: All of them!  My best bike is: Cervelo Dual

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, touring, club rides, fixed/singlespeed, Audax


Add new comment


farrell | 11 years ago

How much was a Brooks saddle in the 70s/80s?

TheHatter | 11 years ago

"may last longer [than a Brooks]"?
but Brooks last forever. Personally I'd spend on a Brooks over this every time as they look a lot better and they are an investment purchase.

Iwein Dekoninck replied to TheHatter | 11 years ago
TheHatter wrote:

but Brooks last forever.

They eventually wear out. Among the hard-core Audaxers, there's some people that are on their third Brooks!

Seriously, the leather does eventually sag further than the nose bolt tightening can remedy.

I've also heard and seen saddle rails and nose bolts break, but have not experienced this myself.

antonio replied to TheHatter | 11 years ago
TheHatter wrote:

"may last longer [than a Brooks]"?
but Brooks last forever. Personally I'd spend on a Brooks over this every time as they look a lot better and they are an investment purchase.

At 75 I can speak with a little authority on that statement, Brooks last for ever, they don't. I've had two Brooks Swallows, the original ones with spring steel stitched in to keep the swallow shape, a number of B17's, the latest B17 special has had two chrome bolts broken in the last 18 months, replaced by Brooks no hassle there. I have just in the last month bought the Spa Aire swallow look alike and at £45 a bargain and is a very good perch also, time will tell but I may not be around for another 75 years to give judgement.

Latest Comments