Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Rapha Merino Knee Warmers



More expensive than most knee warmers, but the super-soft merino wool means they put in a high-level performance

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

These merino wool knee warmers from Rapha are soft and comfortable, and they provide enough insulation for nippy autumn and spring rides.

It's probably a good idea for you to check out our review of Rapha's Merino Arm Warmers too because these are very similar... except they're for your knees.

They're 95% fine merino with 5% elastane (Lycra) in there to provide extra stretch and a bit of added durability. The wool feels super-comfy against your skin and offers a surprising amount of warmth given the light weight - about as much as a pair of roubaix warmers, give or take. (I wore a roubaix knee warmer on one leg and a merino one on the other leg to check. I think I got away with it. People thought it was a fashion statement).

Whereas arm warmers just sit there and look pretty - or not - knee warmers have to flex repeatedly up to a billion times every ride (it might not actually be a billion. But it's a lot). So, if knee warmers aren't stretchy enough, they can go baggy over the course of a ride and you don't want that. I've had wool knee warmers in the past that have struggled to retain their shape and, apart from not being a good look, they can bunch behind your knees and start to chafe.

These knee warmers don't do that. They're well behaved. They keep their shape throughout even a long ride and that's a good thing. They also stay warm if they get a bit sweaty and are much more odour-resistant than most synthetic fabrics.

There's just the one seam and it's flatlock stitched so you can't even feel it and a silicone rubber gripper stops the top from slipping.


More expensive than most knee warmers, but the super-soft merino wool means they put in a high-level performance test report

Make and model: Rapha Merino Kneewarmers

Size tested: Black - L

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Rapha say, "Made from a fabric developed exclusively by Rapha, these high-performance knee warmers combine the natural performance properties of merino wool with a degree of Lycra for stretch and durability. They provide insulation, are highly breathable and also transfer moisture effectively. The fabric is quick-drying so the knee warmers can be used in a variety of conditions."

I'm not sure if Rapha are aiming these at the urban market or the racy market but they're equally suited to either.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

They're 95% merino wool and 5% elastane. You'll probably know that wool still manages to provide a good level of warmth when it's damp.

Rate the product for quality of construction:

These are simple wool tubes - no complicated construction.

Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:
Rate the product for comfort, if applicable:
Rate the product for value:

Expensive if you compare them with standard knee warmers; not so expensive if you compare them with merino knee warmers

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Very well. I've enjoyed using these.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

The high level of comfort.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

The price is pretty high - although you might find it reassuringly expensive, I guess.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes.

Would you consider buying the product? Possibly.

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 40  Height: 190cm  Weight: 74kg

I usually ride:   My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, sportives, general fitness riding,


Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment


dave atkinson | 12 years ago

that's pretty much what mat has been doing

graemeshaw replied to dave atkinson | 12 years ago

That's why I love - that's exactly the sort of dedication I'm looking for in a reviewer. None of this twice round the car park malarkey.

graemeshaw | 12 years ago

To get a billion flexes of 1 knee warmer while cycling, you'd need to ride at 90rpm for a bit over 21 years (I think)  3

nick_rearden replied to graemeshaw | 12 years ago
graemeshaw wrote:

To get a billion flexes of 1 knee warmer while cycling, you'd need to ride at 90rpm for a bit over 21 years (I think)  3

If we could up his cadence to 110rpm we might get the reviews more frequently than once every 21 years. Or am I missing something?

Latest Comments