At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Exactly, and while that might be bad for the bike manufacturing/selling industry, it doesn't automatically correlate to a problem for the cycling...
The Road.cc journo has definitely passed his "find interesting things to say about a very boring product" test!
No idea whether the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is being conveyed in this particular instance but I do recall standing...
What's relevant probably depends on the individual's use case....
'should' these days - only the MUSTs and MUST NOTs are shouted.
Rose-tinted glasses are also good for this.
At last a light worthy of the hack reviewer's cliché, "pumps out the lumens."
Thats not a defence (ironically). Everyone is paid to do their job. Some peoples job is to destroy the environment and ruin the future of billions...
He should come to Bristol, where they're more than happy to send cyclists on a "dismount for this hundred metres of footway" diversion because...
He'll get back to you in another 15 years.