The Vel 300 Lumen Front Light is as efficient and effective as its no-nonsense name suggests. It's bright with strong side-visibility, battery life is good for commuting or proper training efforts, and the build is strong and light. It flickers oddly at low charge, and you may not have a wall charger that meets its very low amperage requirements.
I only realised at the end of this test that the impressive sub-45-minute charge time – for a minimum 2-hour run-time – was courtesy of an overpowered charger. I thought (wrongly) that the 5V QC1.0 charger plugs specified in the comprehensive instructions were 1amp. My fault – it actually says elsewhere it's 0.5amp, and charging takes 2 hours. Higher currents could damage the built-in lithium-ion battery.
> Buy this online here
Trouble is, QC1.0 is old – the more powerful QC2.0 standard arrived in 2015 – so unless your phone or associated 'adaptive' wall chargers are older than that, you're unlikely to have anything suitable. Worse, info seems scarce on chargers themselves, and most of mine had far higher 5V outputs than 1amp anyway. Long story short: you may need to stick to charging the Vel 300 from a computer USB port.
The body of the Vel is aluminium, with the tough plastic rear housing a thick rubber plug to waterproof the charging port. This unit's rated to IPX5, which means it can withstand everything from puddle splashes to sustained hosing, if not actual immersion. The Vel had no problem with ludicrous amounts of rain during the test.
The single button on top is rubber-covered too, but still displays the battery status via a simple three-colour light. It's easy to see at a glance, even in bright sunlight, and the button's easy to use in gloves. A quick stab lights up the charge indicator, while a long press turns the lamp on.
On the most power-thirsty mode (200-lumen high beam) I generally got around 30 minutes before it switched from green to amber, then a further hour before it turned red at 25 per cent left. The final stage lasted a decent 40 minutes before the Vel shut down completely. That's a useful run-time for a 50-odd gram unit, and only extends when using one of the four other modes. It remembers which mode you used last, too, so long as you don't run it entirely flat (it defaults then to low beam).
> Check out the road.cc front light beam comparison engine
There are two other constant modes – a 100-lumen mid and a 50-lumen low – meaning the only actual 300-lumen setting is a flashing one. That's 'day flash,' but as well as being brighter than high beam, it lasts longer at a claimed 3.5 hours. That's likely to be accurate considering the other claims are, though I didn't test an entire burn as I find flashing front lights seriously distracting.
I do, at least, when they're this good at flinging light upwards and to the sides. The chunky plastic lens wraps around to meet the body, leaving it easy to check you've switched it on with a glance at the top rim (although the power meter will tell you the same), and throwing quite tightly focused beams out to the sides.
The sidelights are great for visibility as you pass junctions, although if your hands are on the tops of a dropped bar you'll be blocking the light's path.
The rubber strap is a good length, and wrapping it to your bar to the robust plastic hook takes seconds. The light spins on its mounting point, too, and though it rotates easily I never had unwanted movement once it was set, even on very rough, flood-scarred roads. It spins to allow mounting on a helmet, which is a neat touch, though it's useful for adjusting it for oncoming traffic too.
> The stuff they never tell you about bike lights…
The only issue I had was with the light intermittently fluttering; switching on and off rapidly for a second, before stabilising again. It only seemed an issue when the battery was into the red (25 per cent or less charge), and didn't really affect the usefulness of the light, but it's a little disconcerting. The problem disappears with a full charge.
You're hardly short of choice at this price, so competition is fierce. The Moon Meteor is £5 cheaper than the Vel's RRP (currently reduced to £27) while being more powerful at 500 lumens, though it's heavier, fiddlier and has shorter run-times. The Lezyne KTV Drive 200 and Giant Recon HL100 are also £25, though significantly less powerful, while Lezyne's Mini Drive 400XL is £30 and brighter... but heavier, and burns out quicker.
The Vel 300 holds a useful place at this price, then, with its quality waterproof build, usable run-times and basics-done-smartly design. Tepid charging and – at least with our example – an odd flickering at low charge aside, it's a really tidy little light at a tidy price.
Verdict
Bright, well-made USB-rechargeable safety light with good run-times
Make and model: Vel 300 Lumen front light
Size tested: 300 lumens max
Tell us what the light is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?
The company says: "VEL's 300 Lumen Front Light offers a range of modes to suit different riding conditions."
It's a commuting and road riding light that's bright enough for daytime visibility.
Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the light?
Vel lists these details:
300-lumen
Lightweight alloy construction
Tool-free fitment
3-watt LED
Five modes including dayflash mode: High Beam - 200 lumens/2 hours | Mid Beam - 100 lumens/4 hours | Low Beam - 50 lumens/8 hours | Pulse - 100 lumens/8 hours | Dayflash - 300 lumens/3.5 hours
Memory mode function
Programmable light mode
IPX5 rated water-resistance, including the USB port cover
Low battery indicator: 100-50% - green | 49-25% - amber | 24-0% - red
USB rechargeable
Adjustable strap allows for a 360° pivot so you can use the light on your handlebar or compatible vented helmet
Dimensions: 59x32x23.5mm
Weight: 53 grams
Included: Front light / adjustable rubber strap to fit handlebars with 18-48mm diameter and compatible vented helmets / micro-USB charging cable
Rate the light for quality of construction:
8/10
Crisply built from good materials.
Rate the light for design and ease of use. How simple was the light to use?
8/10
Rate the light for the design and usability of the clamping system/s
8/10
Couldn't be simpler. Quick and secure.
Rate the light for waterproofing. How did it stand up to the elements?
8/10
Well-shielded charging port and button.
Rate the light for battery life. How long did it last? How long did it take to recharge?
8/10
Runs for two hours at full power, and takes as long to recharge – be careful your wall-charger doesn't overcharge it, though.
Rate the light for performance:
9/10
Bright with a good side-splash and an easily monitored battery life.
Rate the light for durability:
8/10
Tough and tidy (yet light) build bodes well.
Rate the light for weight:
8/10
Negligible for its performance.
Rate the light for value:
7/10
Not the cheapest, but scores higher than some rivals on weight and run-times. It's well built and designed, and totally worth it.
Tell us how the light performed overall when used for its designed purpose
Reliably and usefully.
Tell us what you particularly liked about the light
Very easy to use, feels well made and lasts well on a charge.
Tell us what you particularly disliked about the light
Develops a flicker at low charge, plus there's no steady 300-lumen mode.
How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?
It's at the lower end for a quality USB light, and currently reduced to £27.
Did you enjoy using the light? Yes
Would you consider buying the light? Yes
Would you recommend the light to a friend? Yes
Use this box to explain your overall score
The Vel 300 looks simple and is simple to use, which could fool you into thinking it's basic. Take a look at the competition and you quickly realise that simple, effective designs can be the hardest... this light gets almost everything right for looks, performance and ease of use, and is an eight. Simple.
Age: 47 Height: 183cm Weight: 78kg
I usually ride: Vitus Zenium SL VR Disc My best bike is:
I've been riding for: 10-20 years I ride: A few times a week I would class myself as: Experienced
I regularly do the following types of riding: general fitness riding, mtb,
It won't. Never has and never will. Criminals act in two ways: impulsively, where emotion of the moment overcomes all other considerations; with...
All sports have the same issue; the funding is given to support elite activities and get success at international level (the Olympics). British...
I'd say that Mogg Street is more likely used by cyclists who opt for the bridge over the M32 rather than the underpasses rather than trying to...
The whole cycling-safty in the context of road cycling is a very complex issue, with many factors coming into play. Many of these factors have...
if you're not set on a relatively high (32) spoke count, then you could lose a decent chunk of weight with Shimano's (slightly wider) RS100...
And we can be sure that Police Scotland would be similarly disinterested if larger versions were scattered across roads and motorways to sabotage...
Isn't that kind of standard now in the era of disc brakes, electric gears and aero everything? Doesn't seem that long ago that Trek were punting a...
No shit! really? you need a research to come to this conlusion?
Unfortunately for an rrp it sounds about right. Schwalbes latest high end tyres have an rrp of £75.
Welp, the cycling industry wants CVT hubs, and anti-skid brakes, so next they'll come out with a push button motorized seat tilt so you change the...