Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Topeak Shuttle Cage X bottle cage



Great-looking cage that takes a firm hold of your bottle, but does the price make saving weight here a bit daft?

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

Topeak's Shuttle Cage X 3K Carbon bottle cage takes a firm grip on your bottle and doesn't weigh much. Like all carbon fibre cages it's arguably a daft price, but if shaving grams is really really important to you then it's worth considering, and it does have that carbon-weave look for tech points.

  • Pro: Light, hangs on to bottle well, looks cool
  • Con: A lot of money for not much weight saving

The best feature of the Shuttle Cage X is the flared opening, which makes it easier to get your bottle back in when you've had a swig. Your bottle then stays put nicely and the cage grips firmly, but not ridiculously so.

> Find your nearest dealer here

> Buy this online here

Topeak throws in a pair of 7075 aluminium bolts and washers, which is a nice touch. If you're going to spend this much money shaving weight off your water-carrying setup then it's a bit mad to mount it to your frame with the steel bolts that came with your bike. Chapeau!

Of course you could argue that the whole idea of carbon fibre water bottles is a bit mad to start with. While they're significantly lighter than the 48-56g of a standard aluminium cage, you're still looking at spending £100 on a pair to save 50-60g, and then you're going to put over a kilogram of water in them. It's perhaps a bit obsessive.

> How to trim bike weight on the cheap

This is especially true now that plastics specialists have figured out how to make durable bottle cages that are light and cheap. The Zefal Pulse A2 is almost as light as the Shuttle Cage X but costs less than a fifth of the price.

If you prefer the aesthetics of this style of cage, with wings that grip the bottle rather than a top section that encloses it, then the Supacaz Fly Cage has you covered and it weighs just 22g. That may still be a whole gram more than the Shuttle Cage X, but the Fly Cage is a third of the price.

Topeak Shuttle Cage X bottle cage - 2.jpg

Of course, it's your money. You can spend it on what you like, and reviewers wittering on about price always annoys me a bit, especially when the reviewer is me. What we think is good value for money may not be the same as you, even when we carefully couch it in references to other products in the category.

> Read more reviews of bottle cages here

If bike and component weight is vitally important to you, and you love that carbon-weave appearance, then you might think this cage is well worth paying for, in which case, for you, it's probably a four and a half or even five star cage. If you would be far better losing 100g off your waist, which you can literally do in a couple of days by restricting your net calorie intake to 1,500/day, and you're not much bothered about component weight, then the Topeak Shuttle Cage X is a needless frippery and you'd only give it a couple of stars.


Great-looking cage that takes a firm hold of your bottle, but does the price make saving weight here a bit daft? test report

Make and model: Topeak Shuttle Cage X bottle cage

Size tested: One

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

It allows you to carry a water bottle on your bike, doesn't weigh much and, if carbon's your thing, it looks cool.

Topeak says:

"High quality, dynamic carbon fiber 3K construction water bottle cage is ultralight and strong. Includes lightweight 7075 aluminum bolts and washers."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Topeak lists:

MATERIAL: 3K carbon fiber

OUTER DIAMETER: Fits standard water bottles

COMPATIBILITY: Ninja Universal Bracket

SIZE: 14 x 8 x 5.7 cm / 5.5' x 3.1' x 2.2'

WEIGHT: 25 g / 0.88 oz

Rate the product for quality of construction:
Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)

It's not quite THE lightest cage around, but it doesn't weigh much.

Rate the product for value:

An rrp of £55 for a bottle cage is daft. There are aluminium and plastic bottle cages that are very similar weights for far less money.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

It holds a bottle securely and it's not hard to get the bottle in and out. Job done.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

I'm still a sucker for that carbon fibre weave finish.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

The price.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? No

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Only if they were a serious weight-weenie with money to burn.

Use this box to explain your overall score

This is a very good bottle cage, but it's 55 quid, so value for money issues pull down the score.

Overall rating: 7/10

About the tester

Age: 53  Height: 5ft 11in  Weight: 100kg

I usually ride: Scapin Style  My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, touring, club rides, general fitness riding, mountain biking

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for Along with founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Latest Comments