A “violent driver” who deliberately rammed a cyclist into a parked HGV — leaving his victim with spinal fractures that reduced him to “a hollow shell of a person, barely able to get out of bed” — has avoided jail.
Adam Ruszkowski was handed a two-year suspended sentence suspended for two years by a judge at London Crown Court, and will have to pay Thomas Purchase £3,000 in compensation, having pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by dangerous driving in relation to what the judge described as a “moment of madness”.
The Daily Mail reported details of the case from court, Ruszkowski also required to complete 40 days of rehabilitation activity and 200 hours of unpaid work, the 37-year-old single father to twin boys banned from driving for two years.
“One inconsiderate, violent driver who wanted to show who was boss”
The court heard that at around 11.30am on 29 August 2023, Mr Purchase was riding his bike along Lambeth Walk in Kennington when he passed Ruszkowski’s vehicle.
“You thought he had broken your wing mirror, which it appears caused you to lose your temper and to do what you did next,” judge Darren Reed summarised.
The enraged driver accelerated and followed Mr Purchase, driving in “close proximity” and “coming alongside him”. Judge Reed said the cyclist had been “sandwiched between the two vehicles and was not on his bike”.
Eyewitness reports were clear that Ruszkowski had “deliberately swerved” into the cyclist, ramming him into a parked HGV and causing spinal fractures.
“Unsurprisingly your actions had a substantial impact on Mr Purchase,” the judge continued. “His partner had to care for him. He suffered spinal fractures. This was a moment of madness. Mr Purchase could have been killed by your actions, which, I’m sure, is something you have reflected on.”
Prosecutor George Jackson explained how the victim was taken to St Thomas’ Hospital and has not been able to cycle again since due to “ongoing pain and discomfort”.
In his victim impact statement Mr Purchase explained how he “became a hollow shell of a person, barely able to get out of bed” following the incident.
“The impact was so violent and so forceful that I was unable to move my legs. My arms were reduced to uncoordinated wet noodles,” he recalled. “I will be forever grateful to the kind members of the public who came to my aid that day, called the emergency services and bought me ice packs for the pain.
> Hit-and run driver who killed London cyclist jailed for 11 years
“During the whole ordeal the individual who had run me down was nowhere to be seen. I became a hollow shell of a person, barely able to get out of bed.”
Ruszkowski’s legal representation Oliver Snodin suggested his client had “expressed empathy and remorse towards the complainant”.
“This was a moment of madness that was a reaction to the complainant’s actions,” he said. “He is self-employed as a plumber. He has had to adapt to not being able to drive any more. It is frankly something he has had to get used to. He takes jobs in the local area. He doesn’t have the means to carry around large tools.”

59 thoughts on ““Violent driver” avoids jail after deliberately ramming cyclist into parked HGV, causing spinal fractures”
What a f-ing joke
What a f-ing joke
brooksby wrote:
Because:
The only viable approach is avoidance.
I provide a visual aid to spacially challenged road users showing the minimum 1.5m lateral separation required. Costs a couple of quid so way less than video cameras.
1.5m white plastic tube fitted to the seatpost perpendicular to the top tube on the offside.
So far it works well at the expense of close manoeuvres but then that’s the plan – no close passes.
Feedback from the Police has been positive.
Ride safe….
#FONOPS
#Trump2024Jail
#ArmUkraineASAP
#BetterTogether
Why on earth wasn’t this a
Why on earth wasn’t this a GBH charge? Or assault/battery? Wounding with intent? It beggars belief that if you attack someone with a lump of metal, the charge is vastly different if that lump of metal has wheels (like a car) or not (e.g. hammer).
Police/CPS are institutionally anti-cyclist.
Mr Purchase could have been
Mr Purchase could have been killed by your actions, which, I’m sure, is something you have reflected on
Some judges are apt to be sure about lots of things in favour of violent drivers
“having pleaded guilty to
“having pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by dangerous driving in relation to what the judge described as a “moment of madness”
So do you think serial killers/rapists etc are inherantly decent people who have numerous ‘moments of madness’?
this judge seems to know a lot about the perps character.
It is rarely a moment of
It is rarely a moment of madness. That behaviour has almost always been seen on a regular basis before, just without the criminal consequences. And so what if it is a moment of madness – it should not be mitigation and punishment the same (still responsible for those actions).
Didn’t the angry pedestrian
Didn’t the angry pedestrian who pushed a cyclist off the pavement and under a car go to prison? Yet that was ‘just’ a shove, not an attack with a weapon. Why is this less serious?
Because cyclists are wrong.
Because cyclists are wrong.
Didn’t the cyclist die in
Didn’t the cyclist die in that instance. It doesn’t change the intent behind the act but it changes the range of charges and sentences.
I shouldn’t change it this much though.
Pop quiz.
Pop quiz.
I damage someone’s spine with a hammer for looking at me funny. Do I :
a) Get same or less?
b) Get an actual jail sentence?
Are you willing to be a very
Are you willing to be a very apologetic criminal when presented with indisputable evidence of your crime and plead guilty?
Have you ever been caught doing this before? We don’t really care if you are a scumbag, we just need to know if you have been caught being a scumbag.
Have you reflected on your actions and are willing to say you are sorry?
Was he riding a bike when you gave that spine a good whack?
6 years for the first 3, 6 months if you tick that final box.
Cruel and unusual punishment
Cruel and unusual punishment again for a poor driver. Even worse, threatening his livelihood – and what about his two kids? How’s a plumber to get to work, operating in a large, dense urban area – use public transport? I mean, you have to drive to carry around “large tools” right?
Basically you can ruin
Basically you can ruin someone’s life but as long as you ”express remorse” you can get away with it. It’s a sick joke.
I note that he also
I note that he also apparently expressed “empathy”….
Just not at the time whilst behind the wheel when it counted anyway
More from the frontline of
More from the frontline of the War on Motorists…
“Adam Ruszkowski … will
“Adam Ruszkowski … will have to pay Thomas Purchase £3,000 in compensation”
I assume his insurance will also pay out a significantly larger sum in compensation?
Somebody drove into the back of my car a few years ago, his insurer paid me £4500 in compensation. No bones were damaged, just a whiplash injury.
I wonder what sentence I
I wonder what sentence I might get if I were to swing my bike into someone and cause similar injuries.
Assuming, of course, that I do it in a moment of madness and that I’m extremely remorseful and emphatic afterwards. Notwithstanding my own hardship; without the bike I’d have to make adjustments to my lifestyle.
What you should get, as I
What you should get, as I said on here the other day, you can calculate from the fact that, all other things being equal, a car is at least 110 times more dangerous than a bike. But then, compare to the eighteen months Charlie Allison got.
Quote:
Why are you “sure” about that, Your Honour? From this report at least there doesn’t seem to be any indication of reflection or remorse, simply a self-pitying whinge about how he can’t take as many plumbing jobs as he did before because he can’t drive.
I wonder if the family of the
I wonder if the family of the victim, or the victim himself, can have a “moment of madness” and make this lowlife scum pay properly for what he did, and then get away with it if they cry a bit in the witness box. Probably not!
We need an overhaul
This can’t be right
This can’t be right
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/causing-serious-injury-by-dangerous-driving/
How is it not custodial? Must be category A 1
With “other aggravating
With “other aggravating factors” too – victim was a vulnerable road user, driving for commercial purposes.
It’s not very clear that as
It’s now very clear that as with wider society, there is now a substantial cohort of “public servants” that lack even the most rudimentary level of common sense.
Case after case shows the Judiciary to be a soft touch – giving trivial sentences for extremely serious and often violent attacks on cyclists.
Woke thinking is also flourishing – in which the actual victims of violence now see sentences for the perpetators watered down as if they were the victims – usually for extenuating circumstances / risk of hardship etc etc.
People who are violent to others – whether using a hammer or a car equally deserve long custodial sentences. Preferably on some hell hole island many thousands of miles from the rest of us.
Thats because of the idea
Thats because of the idea that society is at fault for anyones bad behaviour so how can you punish someone when its societies fault.
I understand cargo bikes are
I understand cargo bikes are quite good for carrying tools etc for these jobs. I’m sure this could be quite ‘educational’ for him.
Too dangerous innit…
Too dangerous innit…
No ULEZ, MOT, fuel, parking
No ULEZ, MOT, fuel, parking charges, VED….
Yes, they are good for
Yes, they are good for carrying tools – but shouldn’t be ridden by one…
Deliberately hitting someone
Deliberately hitting someone with a car needs to default to attempted murder. Everyone knows that a very likely potential outcome of hitting a person with a car is the death of that person so hitting someone deliberately shouldn’t be seen as anything but trying to kill them.
If you didn’t want to kill them, you wouldn’t have hit them with your car on purpose.
Let the defending solicitors try and argue it down to assault with a deadly weapon or some kind of “attempting to cause death by dangerous driving” or some other lesser charge which still carries a prison term instead of having the default be these psychopaths driving freely among us.
As I’ve said before, for
As I’ve said before, for serious cases like this a serious punishment needs to be doled out.
Otherwise the news to other criminals is that they will simply get away with it.
My usual suggestion also applies: loss of taste buds and libido.
And “If the punishment is just a fine, then it means it is legal for the rich.”
for serious cases like this a
for serious cases like this a serious punishment needs to be doled out
Except, it isn’t- as we see frequently on here. Likewise, close passing is not decreasing, to say the least of it. This is a consequence of the pretence at encouraging ‘active travel’ while not meaning a word of it- and the law enforcement agencies taking a lead from that knowledge
wtjs wrote:
— wtjsNot even pretending any more; they cut the active travel budget by 75%. This government is despicable.
Quote:
The complainant’s alleged actions, surely, Mr Snodin? The motorist, according to the judge, thought that the victim had damaged the mirror. Nobody has said they actually did it.
I think the action was that
I think the action was that the cyclist had overtaken the car. That’s normally enough to get most motorists mad in my experience.
If you stab someone with a
If you stab someone with a knife in a moment of madness is carries a 10 year sentence.
If you crush someone with a motor vehicle it carries a two year suspended sentence, three grand fine, 200 hours community work and a two year driving ban.
What a f&*king joke. What planet does this judge live on.
At the very bare minimum, that scumbag should never be allowed to drive again and his actions should 100% put him in prison.
Also.. they really should not take into account ‘expressions of empathy and remorse’ they really are insulting in cases like this.
The ’empathy’ might have
The ’empathy’ might have worked better at the time of the incident, when he could have used his empathy to try to understand what being hit with a car would feel like…
Can’t Just blame the judge
Can’t Just blame the judge here – also blame the police and CPS for not bringing assault/GBH/wounding with intent charges.
What the actual fvck? Did the
What the actual fvck? Did the drivers in the cases published over the last week or so all happen to know the judges?
This soft-touch judge is
This soft-touch judge is contempable.
It’s not even a lifetime driving ban, he’s just inconvenienced for 2 years.
I hope Mr Purchase carries out a private prosecution and bankrupts the fucker.
Totally lost for words, I
Totally lost for words, I wish Mr Purchase all the best.
This is beyond rediculous, so
This is beyond rediculous, so much pain, frustration and anger for the victim. This judge needs to imagine his wife or sister was handicapped due to the perpetrators momentary madness. The victim was on a bicycle, does the judge lose his/her lack of judgement due to this single fact? Maybe the judge needs to ask, ” What would the punishment be if the victim was a pedestrian or in a wheelchair?”.
This is an attack on purpose
This is an attack on purpose with a homicide being a very possible outcome.
From now maybe I should do some overtime and get stressed at work and gain some sets of 3K, carry a foldable Strida bike and hit whoever I don’t like his face and then throw the Strida bike on his (broken?) legs. I will have 40 days to relax from my stressful overtime at work.
“He doesn’t have the means to
“He doesn’t have the means to carry around large tools.”
get a cargo bike. Then, hopefully, you might get a taste of your own medicine.
Judge “Mr Purchase could have
Judge “Mr Purchase could have been killed by your actions……”
But hey, attempted murder isn’t that serious if you use a car as the weapon, so here’s suspended sentence. Is there any other case of assault with a deadly weapon causing life-changing injuries which could have caused death that is treated as lightly as driving at someone?
Attempted murder is tolerated
Attempted murder is tolerated if the victim is a cyclist. It’s considered ‘anti-car’ to jail someone for the trivial offence of using the car as a lethal weapon. Remember Rishi and Harper are on the side of these oppressed motorists. Cyclist Mr Alliston was jailed for 18mths for killing a pedestrian. He didn’t chase his victim down, or ride his bike into her simply because she was a pedestrian. He rode a bike that was deemed to have insufficient brakes and was jailed. This driver chased after the cyclist and was seen deliberately ramming him into an HGV with his car, yet its deemed to be a ‘moment of madness’ and his hardship is not being able to drive for 2yrs. Perhaps the cyclist would get a similar sentence, if in a moment of madness, he shoots the driver with a gun. His hardship would be being banned from using a gun for 2yrs.
2 years in jail, over 6 year
2 years in jail, over 6 year ban.
Westbrook overtook three to four cars and two cyclists while approaching a right-hand bend.
The rider of the motorcycle – a man who was aged 41 at the time of the collision – was travelling in the opposite direction towards Hintlesham.
He was left with nowhere to go when faced with Westbrook’s van coming towards him on his side of the road. On impact, he was catapulted into the air and landed on his back.
He suffered a number of injuries, including fractures to his vertebrae, fractured ribs and collapsed lungs. His spinal cord injury is so severe that he will not regain any function in his legs and will be a wheelchair user for life.
https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24117376.daniel-westbrook-jailed-hadleigh-crash-2022/
Not sure it’s that much better for a m/c
I’d have said a lifetime ban
I’d have said a lifetime ban for the van driver would be appropriate given the extent of injuries to the motorcyclist. I hope the biker’s insurance company is at least able to extract every single penny of the £1 million + due in compensation.
OldRidgeback wrote:
I can’t see how £1m would be remotely close to enough.
Lifetime care requirements. Care homes run at what, £750-1600/week. So 40-80k/year.
Usual rule for careful, low risk investment is 4% return. Quick google suggests this is what pension companies are offering if you want a lifetime annuity aged 55. So you need a £1m investment pot to cover basic care at 40k/year. And that assumes costs don’t go up…
Given the severity of the injuries, the requirements wont be basic care, so I would suggest a couple of million just to cover potential care costs. We haven’t gotten into any other considerations yet…
qwerty360 wrote:
at age 55 this is the case, what about at age 41?
What mechanisms are there for
What mechanisms are there for pushing for this to be re-examined?
It’s absolute madness. Why on earth is not being able to manage one’s emotions ever able to be used in defense of a serious crime? What other crimes does it negate?
We all have a duty to manage our emotions, if it’s proven you can’t (as here) you should be banned from being allowed to be in those situations.
Unfortunately there is a
Unfortunately there is a restricted list of offences for which the Attorney General’s office will consider an appeal against undue leniency, and causing serious injury by dangerous driving is not one of them.
I should put this Solicitor
I should put this Solicitor on a retainer, may come in handy when I ram a mini pump up the rear end of a “violent driver” suffering from “a moment of madness”….
GC 66 wrote:
GC66: “What do you mean – I got 5 years?”
Hotshot solicitor: “I would have got you less, but it’s inflation, innit?”
?
?
Suspended sentence. You kill
Suspended sentence. You kill me. No really, you do.
“He is self-employed as a
“He is self-employed as a plumber. He has had to adapt to not being able to drive any more. It is frankly something he has had to get used to. He takes jobs in the local area. He doesn’t have the means to carry around large tools.”
What rubbish.
Of course he can still carry large tools. He could get a bike trailer or a cargo bike, then he can carry some pretty big tools – anything I’ve ever seen a plumber carry in their van will go on a bike trailer or on a cargo bike without a problem. Then once he is being regularly harassed by motorists, maybe he will understand.
And of course the Daily Mail
And of course the Daily Mail article has comments reinforcing the message that it’s OK to wipe out cyclists – even if you get caught you won’t suffer too much.
This clearly meets the UK
This clearly meets the UK legal definition of Attempted Murder Category C, Harm 1 or 2. Typical custodial time of 2 to 5 years.
This case sends a clear message that its OK to intentionally use your vehicle as a weapon to cause serious injury, the law will protect you. Until the legal system starts treating cyclists as humans, these incidents will continue to happen.
3 grand doesn’t sound very
3 grand doesn’t sound very much. I’ve been awarded amounts not a lot less than that even for relatively minor injuries.