Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Tory activist criticised for “anti-cyclist” and “jingoistic” opposition to new roundabout

Olly Scargill published a leaflet opposing North Tyneside Council’s plans to construct a Dutch-style roundabout at Rake Lane

A Conservative campaigner has been criticised for promoting “anti-cyclist” and “jingoistic” sentiments after he published a leaflet opposing the construction of what he termed a “European-style” roundabout at Rake Lane, North Tyneside.

Olly Scargill, who based his campaign for election to the South Jesmond ward last year on climate change and reducing pollution levels in the area, claimed that the Labour-controlled council planned to use Rake Lane “as a guinea pig for a European-style roundabout, which would give priority to cyclists.”

To illustrate his point Scargill’s leaflet featured an image of what appears to be Cambridge’s Fendon Road roundabout, which opened in 2020, with the flag of the European Union photoshopped in the middle.

The roundabout at Rake Lane will be the north-east’s first Dutch-style roundabout and forms part of North Tyneside Council’s wider plan to improve the area’s cycle network, including 14km of new bike routes across the borough.

With a cycle path running around the outside and zebra crossings at each exit, the roundabout prioritises cyclists and pedestrians over motorists.

> Work starts on UK's first truly Dutch-style roundabout next month

The roundabout also adheres to the Conservative government’s design guidance for cycle infrastructure, which states that “roundabouts with higher traffic flows and speeds should have protected space for cycling, both around the junction and on all approaches and exits, so that cyclists do not need to cycle in mixed traffic.”

Scargill, however, doesn’t seem aware of his own party’s policy. His leaflet reads: “I’m shocked by how little consultation has taken place on such a major proposal, which would mean vehicles would be forced to give way to both cyclists and pedestrians as they enter and exit the roundabout.

“These roundabouts have been trialled elsewhere in the country, resulting in driver confusion and collisions. Residents have called the roundabout a ‘killing zone’.

“Concerns have also been raised that the roundabout will make congestion worse, especially as development begins with Labour’s 3,000 new houses.”

Unsurprisingly, Scargill’s campaign to halt construction on the roundabout was met with a flurry of criticism.

“This is shameless stuff,” said Alison Stenning on Twitter. “Peddling misinformation, provoking anti-cyclist sentiments and jingoistic anti-European nonsense and, what's more, going against Tory national policies in support of active travel.”

Another Twitter user wrote: “Apart from the fact that this type of design can be found in English design guidance and in turn is based on sound evidence, the jingoism makes it harder for everyone involved in trying to make streets safer. Utterly bizarre.”

Some, of course, saw the funny side: Jonathan tweeted that Scargill’s leaflet was the “EU and cycling anti-fandoms crossover event of the century”, while Harry was inspired to start a petition “to paint the EU flag on the centre of Dutch roundabout in Cambridge.”

Road.cc contacted Scargill today to question his opposition to a scheme seemingly in line with government guidance.

“I entirely endorse the government's active travel agenda. However this proposed site on Rake Lane is unsuitable and unnecessary”, he told road.cc. “The Council's plans for 3,000 new houses to be built on green space adjacent to the roundabout will increase traffic and congestion on this site. Residents have raised issues of safety for pedestrians, cyclists and motorists around the proposed new structure.

“We are lucky in North Tyneside and have a beautiful area to cycle through. But the Council's cycling strategy should instead focus on connecting towns by bringing disused wagon ways up to scratch, rather than making our roads more dangerous than they already are.”

When asked by road.cc about the online criticism of his leaflet, the activist responded: “The use of the EU flag was to demonstrate the origins of the style of roundabout, which is not common in the UK.

“I am deeply saddened that what should have been an open discussion about proposals for a roundabout in our local community has become so vitriolic and personal.

“As a cyclist myself, I know how important it is to feel safe when using the roads. However, this specific proposal is unsuitable and I will continue to listen to residents and do everything I can to stop it going ahead.”

Construction on the Rake Lane roundabout begins this week.

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

45 comments

Avatar
eburtthebike | 2 years ago
8 likes

“I entirely endorse the government's active travel agenda. However this proposed site on Rake Lane is unsuitable and unnecessary”

Unless you're a cyclist or pedestrian.  Is there no end to the hypocrisy and complete lack of self-awareness of the tories?

"....rather than making our roads more dangerous than they already are.”

They aren't; it's the drivers, but I'm guessing he probably doesn't want to hear that.  Maybe he's been watching a bit too much Panorama.

As a complete aside, just come back from playing table tennis, where one player got the point from hitting the net and the ball trickling over, and he said sorry.  His opponent asked if that was really sorry, or Boris-sorry.

Avatar
jestriding replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
10 likes

Well, Farage is certainly proud to be part of Europe; he has a £73,000 EU pension and his children have German passports.

Avatar
jaymack replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
6 likes

Fascism, a political philosophy, movement, or regime such as that of the Fascisti in Italy or that of Spanish Falangism that exalts nation and often race above the individual, a philosphy that stands for a centralised autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition...Nope this looks nothing like the EU.

Avatar
giff77 replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
3 likes

You disappoint me. To assume that an individual would fall in line with the world view and thinking of another individual of the same name is pretty poor form. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to giff77 | 2 years ago
3 likes
giff77 wrote:

You disappoint me. To assume that an individual would fall in line with the world view and thinking of another individual of the same name is pretty poor form. 

Brilliant comment - took me a while to get it though! laugh

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
7 likes

Kudos for the banging in of "as a cyclist myself" there, thought he was going to miss it out but sneaked it under the wire.

Avatar
giff77 replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
6 likes

Ah. But he is the cyclist who commutes to the office daily or is he the cyclist who ferrries his his bike by car to some random country/forest park twice a year for an hour of whatever? 

Avatar
chrisonabike | 2 years ago
6 likes

Gosh - he'll be banning garages next - that's clearly a French word!

Wait a moment - "car" (although passing through Celtic and Latin according to Oxford Languages) actually was borrowed from French.

Take back your bonkers EU "cars", Johnny Foreigner!  Nothing but a good old kartr and hors for us!

Avatar
brooksby replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
2 likes

Don't forget "peloton" and "panniers"!  3

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
2 likes

Stick to spearheads and carrying my waterskin in my trusty trug. I'll have none of your "deraillieurs" here, thank you - in the UK we have gear shifters.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
7 likes

So it's actually a 'because'? Explains a lot about British cultural attitudes to transport.

Banning Garages, though - there's a thought...

Avatar
Moist von Lipwig | 2 years ago
8 likes

For those interested, the excellent Ranty Highwayman did a review on this scheme.

https://therantyhighwayman.blogspot.com/2021/05/what-is-dutch-style-roun...

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Moist von Lipwig | 2 years ago
3 likes

Always love a bit of Ranty - ranty by name, calming by nature.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
6 likes

Well, if he doesn't want things that worked well in Europe first, there is alot in this country he will want changing then. Surprised he hasn't asked McDonalds to remove French Fries from the menu and call them "thin chips".

Avatar
brooksby replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
9 likes

Or Freedom Fries, or asking for a Brexit Butty  3

Seriously, though, how can he have based his campaign for election on "climate change and reducing pollution levels in the area" but then throw a tantrum when someone does something practical to try and increase levels of active travel (which, last time I checked, would help toward reducing pollution levels...)?

("What's that, Sooty?  You think he jumped on a bandwagon and doesn't really care about all those things he claimed when he was trying to be elected?")

Pages

Latest Comments