Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Peloton being sued for alleged patent infringement

Spinning pioneer Mad Dogg Athletics wants indoor fitness brand to face jury trial

Peloton, the indoor fitness brand, is being sued for alleged patent infringement by the company that pioneered the static bike spinning craze back in the 1990s.

Mad Dogg Athletics, based in Venice, California, alleges that New York City-based Peloton has infringed two patents that it holds relating to electronic static bikes, reports Bicycle Retailer and and Industry News (BRAIN).

The plaintiff company, founded by two road cyclists in 1994, has filed for a jury trial the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall – a town that, as BRAIN points out, is known as “the patent litigation capital of America.”

Mad Dogg Athletics says that the venue is appropriate given that Peloton has a regional campus, as well as a shop, in Plano, Texas – although as this article from Texas Monthly makes clear, there’s a strong reason for a plaintiff in a patent infringement case seeking a jury trial there.

As well as seeking damages the lawsuit, which relates to the Peloton Bike and Peloton+ Bike, is also seeking damages as well as an order stopping the defendant from continuing to alleged infringement.

Peloton is currently facing a similar lawsuit, this one filed in Delaware, from Icon Fitness, which makes NordicTrak bikes; the company is counter-suiing, claiming that Icon Fitness attempted to steal its advertising plans.

Of course, Peloton itself is no stranger to threatening legal action if it perceives that its own intellectual property is being infringed.

Two years ago, the company attracted widespread derision in cycling circles when it threatened a YouTuber with legal action for using the word “peloton” in the titles of his videos. The company subsequently backed down.

> Indoor cycling brand Peloton threatens YouTuber with legal action ... for using the word ‘peloton’

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


Langsam | 3 years ago

Who edits the editor?

'from continuing to alleged infringement.'

continuing to allegedly infringe

continuing its alleged infringement 


You're welcome  


quiff replied to Langsam | 3 years ago

'continuing to allegedly infringe'

continuing allegedly to infringe

You're welcome

* I don't really care, I think the war on split infinitives is already lost, but couldn't resist 

mdavidford | 3 years ago
1 like


As well as seeking damages the lawsuit [...] is also seeking damages

Going big on the damages front then?

RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

whats an inddor fitness brand??

Compact Corned Beef replied to RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

Like an otdoor fitness brand, but with a rf and waals.

TheBillder replied to Compact Corned Beef | 3 years ago

Or is it Welsh?

Latest Comments