Update, 9/9/2022: due to an ongoing investigation, this video has been removed until further notice.
Today's Near Miss of the Day shows a reckless and terrifying overtake from a driver that nearly resulted in a head-on collision with the cyclist travelling in the other direction.
road.cc reader Simon said that he was forced to take evasive action to avoid the driver of a white Volkswagen SUV, who was overtaking multiple vehicles at speed on the road in Lancashire, near to the town of Southport in neighbouring Merseyside.
He told road.cc: "My near miss from last weekend was very close to a head-on collision with a car that decided to overtake a stream of traffic despite me being in the oncoming lane.
"There was a gap between the cars that I genuinely thought he was going to pull into until he stayed out and whizzed past me at high speed.
"I only missed him by swerving sharply to the left. As it was he passed with less than 30cm clearance.
"For context (and I know I shouldn't have to do this): I was wearing bright cycling kit with an orange helmet and had a white flashing front light."
Simon added that he has reported the incident to Lancashire Police, who listed a number of possible outcomes but said they would not be disclosing it.
He said: "I have reported this to Lancashire police who have emailed me that they are pursuing it further and have listed a range of options from a guidance letter up to points & fine. They have told me that they will not inform me of the ultimate result."
> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling
Add new comment
15 comments
I had this happen to me about 8 years ago in Penkridge near Stafford. I was on my time trial bike at the time on a 60mph road. I looked up to see a car coming directly towards me going well over the speed limit. Life literally flashing before my eyes as I felt the wing mirror brush past my arm. Had I been even a few cm over to the right I would have been obliterated. It is the single most scary thing I have ever suffered.
The fact I actually set an amazing time probably due to adrenalin is little consolation. I still think about how close I actually came to being killed by someone wanting to save seconds off their journey. That is how ridiculous this behaviour is. The end result for them is hardly worth the risk of killing someone, destroying families and their own future (if prosecuted) for so little gain. I prey that one day a governement has the bollocks to actually treat actions that kill cyclists or other road users with a proper sentence that fits the damage it causes. Manslaughter should be the charge regardless of the way it happened. Death by careless driving is an insult to all those poor souls killed on our roads due to the ignorance of others behind the wheel.
Here's the thing according to the police, so presumably the CPS and your local MP, if you are on the receiving end of bad driving, provided you are not injured - or your property is not damaged- then you are nothing but a witness to bad driving and will therefore not be entitled to know what measures have been taken, if any, against the driver. Until you, depending on the circumstances - were you terrified, could you have been killed - are recognised as a victim then nothing will change. It is this "witness" that needs to change to victim before anything else can be done.
Oh and well done road.cc for using victim in the intro. This language needs to be used so that it can permeate.
Similar Experience - I got a close pass in February that was actually a hit by a wing mirror that brought me off the bike and was told that I was a witness.
What do you have to do to be a victim?
What do you have to do to be a victim?
Be properly injured or killed so that the police can move straight onto the 'insufficient evidence' dodge.
Sadly, the "no blood, no foul" rule seems to be the standard
A white German SUV being driven very dangerously you say...
Lancashire police you say...
Though I like the painted warning right turn approaching at the start of the vid.
Haven't seen any of them down here. I wonder if they have as much of an effect as painted speed limits or the SLOW.
Though I like the painted warning right turn approaching at the start of the vid
I haven't seen any of those in North Lancashire
It is right in the cusp of Lancashire and Merseyside
Paging wtjs, wtjs to the "reporting to Lancashire Police" thread....
Well, strictly speaking the driver wasn't overtaking the cyclists, so all that stuff about giving the cyclist the same room as you would when overtaking a car, out the window!
all that stuff about giving the cyclist the same room as you would when overtaking a car, out the window!
That went out the window in Lancashire before they invented windows, or cars, at about the same time as they introduced Bad Cops
Thanks. Of course, Simon could have received a different warning letter, but the usual one reads:
Once the driver has been identified then we will assess the most appropriate outcome, which could be;
1. An advice letter
2. A Driver Educational Course.
3. A conditional offer of points and a fine.
4. A summons to court.
I have, you will understand, a not inconsiderable experience of Lancashire Constabulary Official Dodges. What this means is that the most appropriate action could also be 'nothing at all', which is the most likely outcome. They don't send letters to me now, because they know I am accumulating too many sticks to beat them with. They just never respond and never do anything about anything
I think the dodge is the first word - "once". Until that's satisfied, nothing. But yeah, just in case the driver presents voluntarily, plan B!
I think the dodge is the first word - "once". Until that's satisfied, nothing
True in a way, but when they're planning ahead to Dodge Phase II where they're agreeing with the PCC a position in which they were right to do nothing about anything ever, it's going to look even more obviously bent when they claim they weren't able to identify the driver