Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Near Miss of the Day 467: Driver refuses to wait for sensible place to pass club run

Our regular series featuring close passes from around the country and beyond - today it's Somerset...

Today’s near miss looks bad enough on first viewing. Now watch it again and imagine five more riders lined up behind the one with the camera.

The incident occurred at the junction of the A369 and A39 in Marksbury.

“We were on our standard Saturday morning club run, when the driver decided to squeeze through a pinch point,” said Jayme. “There were six of us in the group, fairly close together, as club runs tend to be.”

Jayme reported the incident to Avon and Somerset Police and received their standard response that a warning letter, fixed penalty notice, or notification of intended prosecution would be issued but that no further details would be provided.

The force is one of several to effectively treat close passes of cyclists as a “victimless crime” by regarding those on the receiving end as merely witnesses.

Most police forces accept reports by cyclists of careless or dangerous driving as a complaint by a victim, which means they are then obliged to provide information about the investigation in compliance with the Victims Code of Conduct.

Cycling UK believes that in treating a cyclist submitting evidence as only a witness, forces are implying that their report isn’t been taken seriously.

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
Shades | 3 years ago
0 likes

I'm not surprised; I ride (and drive) around that part of the country and avoid the A39 and A368.  Both busy A roads with very few places to safely overtake.  Popped onto the A39 in Marksbury (the village that video is from) for a very short stretch recently and took 'primary position' going through some traffic islands earning a volley of abuse from a driver.  Last year I was in the car further down the A368 and stopped to help as there'd been a hit and run on a sportive.  The local clubs are always on them, but for me; no-thanks.

Avatar
LetsBePartOfThe... | 3 years ago
5 likes

because certain drivers cannot be trusted to drive safely or competently, I personally would take a situation like this into my own hands and would adopt the primary position through the stop line, junction, and thereafter. There is a forum topic from a few months ago about this, called Primary Position. Basically I now will position much more assertively. Never to cause inconvenience for the sake of it. But always putting my safety ahead of their hurry. I'm interested to understand why primary is not a lot more prevalent by everyone  - especially amongst experienced riders. Is it out of politeness and helpfulness. I'd say safety trumps all else

 

Avatar
alchemilla | 3 years ago
0 likes

Unfortunately it is a "victimless crime" because in law it is not considered a crime, therefore no one can be a victim.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
2 likes

It looked like the first 2 cars were a bit trigger happy at the lights as well.  I can understand why they didn't as it's initially quite a wide junction, but I'd have been tempted to occupy the primary position in the cycle box as well.  Though to be fair I wouldn't do that always and it would have been interesting to see a rear view or a couple of minutes beforehand to see the clubs and drivers behaviour.  It's easy to be an armchair critic with this stuff though! Doesn't excuse the nasty pass though.

Sometimes a driver seeing others "winning" the overtake encourages them to do something silly too I wonder if that's what happened here.

Avatar
ktache replied to Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
3 likes

I always thought it was just blindly following the arse of the car in front.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
7 likes

While I can't disagree that the driver did choose to pass dangerously close and should be held to account for it, in any group I've been riding with in the past few years, at least two of the riders would adopt primary position going through a road narrowing like that.  Physical prevention is the only thing some drivers understand.

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
4 likes

 for a large vehicle, leave a minimum distance of 2.0 metres in all conditions?!

This happened on the 8th, was reported online on the 9th, and has still not even been allocated a Lancashire Constabulary incident number or received any other response. This school bus, operated by 'Coach Hire Executive' Preston, not only came a lot closer than 1.5m, but was almost completely over the unbroken white line in a dangerous position on the approach to a humped canal bridge which is immediately followed by a sharp left hand bend- and I was cycling at about 17+ mph. As soon as the coach passed me the driver began braking so that he could swerve back left to avoid colliding with the oncoming car which suddenly appeared at the bridge crest. The coach was filmed entering Garstang High School a couple of minutes later. The incident is fully documented in a comprehensive 11 page .pdf file which is full of photos, but experience tells me that the police have already begun the Standard Dodge Strategy which ends with ''it is now too late to process this case'.

All these laws, consultations, advice etc. are useless when the police refuse to enforce them because their only criterion for a 'real offence' is Blood On the Road.

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
0 likes

More deplorable still is this screenshot from the laughable present Highway Code consultation. 2 metres in a 40 limit zone?! They're doing at least 40 in the 30 zones.

Avatar
alexls replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
0 likes

It's 2m at over 30mph - not in an over 30mph zone.  1.5m in a 40mph zone is 'fine' if overtaking at 25mph, but 1.5m doing 40mph in a 30mph zone is speeding as well as a close pass. 

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
0 likes

Below is a screenshot from the BBC website, describing the usual fiction of the 1.5m 'clearance'. I think most regular cyclists in the UK experience several 0.5m close pass incidents a day, and yet the police continue to regard this as a non-offence. When the police refuse to tell you what they've done it means they have done nothing at all.

Avatar
andystow replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
7 likes

Why is it shown measured to the narrow roof of the car? And is the cyclist four meters tall?

Avatar
wtjs replied to andystow | 3 years ago
1 like

Why is it shown measured to the narrow roof of the car?

It is, of course, measured between vertical imaginary lines passing through the outermost part of the cyclist and the innermost part of the nearside mirror

Avatar
andystow replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
3 likes

Here's what's really shown in the image. I thought the car looked a bit like a Twingo, and based on that found the vertical scale for both the car and the cyclist were pretty similar.

Cyclist 1.8 m
64 pixels
0.024 m/pixel

Twingo 1.55 m
68 pixels
0.023 m/pixel

5 pixels = 0.12 m
17 pixels = 0.41 m
27 pixels = 0.65 m

Latest Comments