Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Lorry driver who killed cyclist after rolling through give way said he was taught to "progress where possible"

Driver said he did not see cyclist – possibly because of his truck’s blind spots – but CPS declines to bring charges

The Crown Prosecution Service has declined to take action after a cyclist was killed by a lorry driver who didn't see him. 80-year-old Frank Curley was hit when Nick Markillie failed to give way. The driver – whose licence had expired – explained that he had been taught not to stop at a junction if he thought the road was clear.

Essex Live reports that Curley was riding along London Road in Romford on the afternoon of December 19, 2017 when Markillie emerged from a side road and hit him.

A witness told Walthamstow Coroners' Court: "The lorry wasn't going fast. I saw the lorry hit the cyclist.

"I saw the lorry shaking and then realised it was rolling over the cyclist. As soon as it happened the lorry stopped and the cyclist was lying on the floor."

Data from the lorry showed Markillie had been doing 7.5mph and didn’t slow when he pulled onto London Road.

Markillie’s colleague, who had been in the passenger seat, called the emergency services. An air ambulance attended, but Curley died at the scene.

Markillie said he was sure he looked both ways several times as he approached the junction.

"I heard a sort of metallic sounding scratching noise on the side of my lorry so I looked in my mirror. I stopped immediately, jumped out and realised the seriousness of what had happened."

Markillie told the court that he did not stop at the give way line because he believed the road was clear.

He said he had been taught to avoid stopping and starting and to 'progress where possible'.

Coroner Nadia Persaud said: "For a large goods vehicle not to stop and make proper checks before going on the road just seems to me unsafe.

"I'm concerned about that training. It seems so unsafe to me that a large goods vehicle can pull straight out onto a main road, straight onto a cycle lane without stopping and carrying out proper checks to make sure it's safe to proceed."

While road users must stop behind the line at junctions with a ‘Stop’ sign and a solid white line across the road, the Highway Code states only that vehicles approaching a ‘Give Way’ sign must give way to traffic on the main road.

Met Police forensic collision investigator Charlie Dunn, who completed similar training to Markillie, said he too had been taught to 'progress where possible'.

Markillie said that blind spots in his vehicle, including the wing mirror and A-frame may have obscured his view of the road.

Vision tests were carried out on the lorry to identify the blind spots. PC Dunn explained that they were dependent on the seating position of the driver.

"It is clear that Mr Markillie was unaware of Frank," he said. "I cannot say whether or not he looked or didn't look. All I can say is that if he did look and saw Frank, he should have given way.

"I think the way we must look at this is if he didn't think there was anything to give way to, then he had no reason to give way at the junction."

Markillie’s licence expired several months before the collision.

"I didn't have the correct entitlement due to conditions for a medical," he said. "At the time it was due be renewed I was moving house. I have no memory of ever receiving a reminder, otherwise I would have completed it."

When he realised his licence was out of date, he arranged for his medical test and passed, and was issued with a new licence.

DC Iain Lister told the coroner that the Crown Prosecution Service had made the decision to take no further action against Mr Markillie for the crash or for not having a valid licence.

He said: "Either he didn't look properly or there was an obstruction. He did not see Frank and he collided with him. No charges were brought against him."

The coroner said that she would be contacting the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) about the teaching of drivers to 'progress where possible'.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to alexls | 3 years ago
7 likes

alexls wrote:

eburtthebike wrote:

I don't give a damn what his training was, the law is clear:

Rule 171

You MUST stop behind the line at a junction with a ‘Stop’ sign and a solid white line across the road. Wait for a safe gap in the traffic before you move off.

 

It was a Give Way, not a Stop.  The absence of licence is another matter.

Thanks, you're right, it does say give way, and he didn't give way so still broke the law. But the presence of a cycle lane should have made the driver expect cyclists and to look out specifically for them.

Avatar
brooksby replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
10 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

Thanks, you're right, it does say give way, and he didn't give way so still broke the law. But the presence of a cycle lane should have made the driver expect cyclists and to look out specifically for them.

And that's the main issue - he understood that he had to give way, but is claiming that he didn't see anything to give way TO.

In my personal opinion, and especially given the added extra of The Case of the Expired HGV Licence, these claims are something that ought to be tested in court rather than the CPS just saying, "There, there, nothing to be done".

Avatar
EK Spinner | 3 years ago
20 likes

the whole thing about the training and roling through is complete flannel and distraction, That is simply the process of giving way as the road markings require.

What we have hear is an unlicensed driver who failed to give way and caused a fatal collision, and a CPS who has decided not to hold the driver accountable for thier actions.

The driver should be held accountable for thier actions (and the results of thier actions) and someone at the CPS should be explaining to the Coroner (and the public) why they have decided not to prosecute

Avatar
I love my bike replied to EK Spinner | 3 years ago
3 likes

Also, an enlightening listen:

The Spokesmen cycling podcast ep. 206 - there is no such thing as a blind-spot on a truck, says truck driver.

Avatar
EK Spinner replied to I love my bike | 3 years ago
5 likes

I will look that out.

I regularly have to argue that there is no such thing as a blind bind, or blind summit only (in)appropriate speeds to approach then at

Pages

Latest Comments