Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“If the weapon had been a knife or baseball bat the driver might be looking at a prison sentence”: anger over hit-and-run driver's assault on cyclist

Anger on social media that motorist who appeared to knock David Williams from his bike on purpose did not face more serious charges

A hit-and-run driver who knocked a cyclist off his bike in London’s Richmond Park has been fined for careless driving – although many who have viewed footage of the incident now posted on Twitter have expressed shock that the charges the motorist faced were not more serious, given that it appears to have been a deliberate act. The victim himself has said that “if the weapon of choice had been a knife or baseball bat the driver might be looking at a prison sentence.”

The incident happened last November, and left cycling instructor and bike mechanic David Williams with a broken collarbone.

He said at the time that a slow-motion edit of the footage he had captured left him in no doubt that the driver knocked him off his bike on purpose.

The driver, Adrian Stephney, appeared at Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday and pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention.

According to the Twitter account of the Metropolitan Police Service’s Royal Parks Police unit, he was fined £418 fine and ordered to pay £110 costs as well as a £42 victim surcharge. His driving licence was also endorsed with 6 penalty points.

Now that the court case has concluded, Williams, who had been returning home to Long Ditton through the park after leading a cycle training session in Mortlake, has posted footage of the incident to Twitter.

In a statement sent to road.cc following sentencing, Williams said: “I am pleased the criminal case has concluded and I am grateful for the help and support of the Parks Police officers in this matter. 

“I am disappointed that the Metropolitan Police Traffic team and CPS could not charge the driver with a more serious crime. I am disappointed that the Magistrate could not have handed down a stiffer sentence. 

“I believe that I was assaulted in a moment of rage by Mr Stephney and if the weapon of choice had been a knife or baseball bat the driver might be looking at a prison sentence.

“This and other cases highlight the casual acceptance of road violence by the justice system and society in general.

“In the UK approximately five people per day are killed and many more are seriously injured as a consequence of dangerous driving yet it seems to be accepted as ‘one of those things’, a cost of doing business.

“Driving a motor vehicle is judged to be a right, not a privilege that should only be afforded to those that keep other humans safe.

“I endured nearly 3 months of pain and discomfort, I wasn’t able to work for much of that time with the consequential loss of income in the run-up to Christmas which caused anxiety and disappointment.

“I am lucky I have a support network who could help me day to day because I am a father, husband, brother and son, all those things that my family came close to losing.

“Three weeks after getting back on the bike, I was hit again by a driver coming too close, there was no intent or serious physical injury that time but more anguish at what might have been at the actions of another driver whose entitlement valued moments of their life more important than all of mine.

“Both events have severely shaken my confidence to keep myself safe on the roads of SW London,” he added.

A number of people on Twitter expressed incredulity that the charges brought against the driver by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) were not more serious.

At the time of the crash, Williams told Kingston Nub News: “I have had some close scrapes in my time, but this is one where we came off second best.

“I was heading along Queens Road in the park towards Pembroke Lodge. Traffic levels were fairly normal and several cars went past me at a safe distance, although maybe faster than they should have been going.

“This one car, a blue BMW, went past me and was really close. I slapped the boot to let the driver know how close he had been.

“He immediately braked quite sharply. I wasn’t able to stop but filtered along the road between the car and grass and ended up in front of him.

“Immediately, he then accelerated and came alongside me – about a foot away. I rapped on his roof to make the point he was too close and get him away.

“He accelerated again and swerved in towards me, knocking me off balance and I fell right onto my shoulder into the road. He then sped off down the hill.

“I was lying on the ground in shock and pain. Several people, including the drivers behind, stopped and came to help me. Luckily an ambulance was coming up the hill towards me and they stopped.

“Within a couple of minutes the paramedics were helping me. I was lying on the floor for 20 minutes or so, they put a sling on my arm and I was taken to Kingston Hospital.

“The people in the other cars behind me were shocked. This was not an accident. They probably thought they wanted to scare me, but the consequences are very serious for me.

“My head hit the floor quite hard and my helmet is now finished as it has a big crack in it.”

His injuries, which besides the broken collarbone included severe bruising, forced Williams to take several weeks off work and he confirmed in a tweet that he is pursuing the driver for compensation through a civil action.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

45 comments

Avatar
Patrick9-32 | 2 years ago
10 likes

If the court position was "driver hits a vulnerable road user and drives away, by default this is deliberate" and the defence had to argue their way down from there this kind of thing would be far less likely to happen. 

If you hit someone by accident there is no valid reason to drive away rather than help them.

If it is clear that you hit someone on purpose with a car because you chose to drive away rather than assist the person, you should have to prove you werent trying to kill them. If you can't prove that then you should go to prison for many years. A fine is a joke, in this case the cost of trying to kill a person was a day in court and £570. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Patrick9-32 | 2 years ago
13 likes
Patrick9-32 wrote:

If the court position was "driver hits a vulnerable road user and drives away, by default this is deliberate" and the defence had to argue their way down from there this kind of thing would be far less likely to happen. 

If you hit someone by accident there is no valid reason to drive away rather than help them.

If it is clear that you hit someone on purpose with a car because you chose to drive away rather than assist the person, you should have to prove you werent trying to kill them. If you can't prove that then you should go to prison for many years. A fine is a joke, in this case the cost of trying to kill a person was a day in court and £570. 

If the punishment is a fine, then that law only exists for poor people

Avatar
nosferatu1001 replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like

It's in theory variable based on income, as it's based on relevant income. Trouble is, not always properly done, and doesn't scale high enough 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to nosferatu1001 | 2 years ago
5 likes
nosferatu1001 wrote:

It's in theory variable based on income, as it's based on relevant income. Trouble is, not always properly done, and doesn't scale high enough 

It's almost as if the MET police are scared of the rich and powerful

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
4 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:
nosferatu1001 wrote:

It's in theory variable based on income, as it's based on relevant income. Trouble is, not always properly done, and doesn't scale high enough 

It's almost as if the MET police are scared of the rich and powerful

Not "scared" any more than most people are "scared" by their boss.  They work for them. (Mostly - they probably really enjoy that one time that they can issue a fifty quid fine to the prime minister though.  But they know not to take the piss and issue two).

Avatar
the little onion | 2 years ago
4 likes

The police and CPS are institutionally anti-cyclist. How is this not assault?

Avatar
the little onion replied to the little onion | 2 years ago
4 likes
the little onion wrote:

The police and CPS are institutionally anti-cyclist. How is this not assault?

Picking up on the Inspector's point above, let me clarify that the fault here lies squarely on the CPS and their definitions/standards.

Avatar
Hirsute | 2 years ago
17 likes

Glad you picked this one up.

If I had a run in with a pedestrian and subsquently knocked them to the ground causing them a broken collarbone and severe bruising, I'd bet I'd be charged with a bit more than careless cycling.

Avatar
a1white replied to Hirsute | 2 years ago
3 likes

Can you imagine the Daily Mail headline too 🙄

Avatar
Flintshire Boy replied to a1white | 2 years ago
0 likes

.

No. Maybe you could help us out on that.

.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Flintshire Boy | 2 years ago
4 likes
Flintshire Boy wrote:

.

No. Maybe you could help us out on that.

.

"Cycle Fanatic Attacks Innocent Driver"

Avatar
the little onion replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
6 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:
Flintshire Boy wrote:

.

No. Maybe you could help us out on that.

.

"Cycle Fanatic Attacks Innocent Driver"

"Immigrant cycle fanatic who lives in £3 million pound house attacks innocent driver, causing cancer"

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to the little onion | 2 years ago
7 likes
the little onion wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:
Flintshire Boy wrote:

.

No. Maybe you could help us out on that.

.

"Cycle Fanatic Attacks Innocent Driver"

"Immigrant cycle fanatic who lives in £3 million pound house attacks innocent driver, causing cancer"

That's a bit too wordy for their readers - needs to be something snappy like:

Avatar
Hirsute replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes

Lycra Lout

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Flintshire Boy | 2 years ago
5 likes
Flintshire Boy wrote:

No. Maybe you could help us out on that.

You want them to help you fix your lack of imagination? Seems to be asking rather a lot.

Pages

Latest Comments