Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Woman who drank "five pints and measure of spirit" before killing cyclist on drive home from pub jailed for six years

Vicky Hardy hit Ali Reza Ghaisar while driving drunk at 38mph on a 30mph road, before fleeing the scene

A drink-driver who drank "five pints and a measure of spirit" during an evening-long pub session before driving home, hitting and killing a cyclist while speeding at 38mph on a 30mph road has been sentenced to six years in prison.

Vicky Hardy was jailed at Newcastle Crown Court for her actions in the early hours of a morning in July 2022, the Sunderland Echo reports, CCTV from The Jolly Potter pub showing the 44-year-old consuming numerous drinks before getting into her car, despite being "unsteady on her feet", and attempting to drive home.

CCTV from a nearby hostel showed Hardy mounting the pavement as she tried to leave the pub's car park, the drink-driver soon after hitting and killing a "beloved" man described as "generous, kind and harmless" by his family.

Ali Reza Ghaisar was cycling on Hylton Road when Hardy hit him at 38mph as she attempted to drive the journey home of just over a mile from the pub she had spent around six hours at, drinking "five pints and a measure of spirit".

Mr Ghaisar was thrown across the road to the other side of the carriageway by the impact, the local press reporting that the court heard he was "fully lit up" but suffered catastrophic injuries caused by Hardy. Members of the public attempted CPR until paramedics arrived, but he died at the scene.

While those at the scene attempted to save Mr Ghaisar's life, Hardy fled but was caught on camera returning to the crash site, before again driving off and returning home.

Prosecutor Kevin Wardlaw told the sentencing hearing: "The defendant had spent the hours before the offence drinking with her partner in the public house the Jolly Potter just over a mile from the location of the incident. CCTV footage from the pub shows defendant arrive just after 7pm in the evening parking in the pub car park.

"Her home address at the time was about one-and-a-half miles from the premises. She remained there to about 1:15, during which time cameras showed her consuming about five pints and a measure of spirits. By the time the defendant left with her partner she appeared to be unsteady on her feet.

"A later analysis resulted in the calculation that the defendant was travelling at a speed of about 38mph on a road which is a 30mph limit. The defendant did not stop, only appearing to brake. The vehicle was seen to continue to travel east towards Hylton Road.

"The defendant called her mother to say she thought she had killed someone. Family members gathered at her address and attempts were made to get her to call police."

Hardy was arrested the following day, when officers were called to her address. Her legal representation, Tony Cornberg, told the hearing she just wants her "punishment to start", the judge subsequently jailing her for six years and adding an eight-year driving ban to the sentence.

In a victim impact statement, Mr Ghaisar's sister-in-law explained how the family had been in Turkey on holiday when a friend told them he had been killed.

"My mother-in-law was in our home country of Iran. I told her to get the first flight to the UK," she said. "I could not tell her over the phone what she was alone as she would have collapsed. When she arrived in the UK I told her her son was no longer with us. It's been two years since Ali was killed and for the last two years my mother-in-law has cried every day for her son. I have noticed a change in my husband since his brother was killed."

The sister-in-law also explained how Mr Ghaisar often met with refugees and members of the public in need, "would always put others before himself" and "would give his last penny even if it meant Ali had nothing".

"From the bottom of my heart, I urge the court to give justice to Ali," she said.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
ktache | 1 week ago
1 like

My thoughts are with the family and friends of Ali.

Avatar
MattKelland | 1 week ago
11 likes

"It's been two years since Ali was killed and for the last two years my mother-in-law has cried every day for her son."

That's absolutely heartbreaking.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 week ago
19 likes

I'm sure this horrible incident will feature heavily in the right wing media in the coming days, just like the drunk cyclist who hit a pedestrian.

 

 

Only joking!  Of course they won't mention it.

Avatar
Shades replied to eburtthebike | 1 week ago
10 likes

The Motornormativity world (Global Cycling Network have a good video on it  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4GZnGl55c ); any hazards or risks associated with use of cars, and resulting deaths, are deemed acceptable

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Shades | 1 week ago
2 likes

Shades wrote:

The Motornormativity world (Global Cycling Network have a good video on it  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4GZnGl55c ); any hazards or risks associated with use of cars, and resulting deaths, are deemed acceptable

Thank you.  In that much overused phrase, a "must watch" a fantastic analysis of why we're where we are and how difficult it is to achieve change.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Shades | 1 week ago
2 likes

I found that by chance a week or so ago (the YT algorithm recommended it on the sidebar for something else I was watching, IIRC).  Very good.

Avatar
alvinlwh | 1 week ago
5 likes

The road should be reduced to 20.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to alvinlwh | 1 week ago
2 likes

Looking on Streetview, some of it has been!  Not sure how much, but most of the road looks like it is residential / shops etc so lower speeds would be nicer. I guess in typical UK fashion it functions as a distributor though?

Avatar
Simon E replied to alvinlwh | 1 week ago
9 likes

alvinlwh wrote:

The road should be reduced to 20.

The road isn't the problem.

It's people who don't give a shit that are the problem.

An 8 year ban is something, though I'd be happier if she was told she would be back in jail immediately if caught driving while banned.

Avatar
jh2727 replied to Simon E | 1 week ago
3 likes

Simon E wrote:

alvinlwh wrote:

The road should be reduced to 20.

The road isn't the problem.

It's people who don't give a shit that are the problem.

An 8 year ban is something, though I'd be happier if she was told she would be back in jail immediately if caught driving while banned.

Enforcement of a driving ban (by putting the person behind bars), makes perfect sense to me, for people who refuse to adhere to a driving ban.

Avatar
jaymack replied to Simon E | 1 week ago
5 likes

The sentencing guideline for driving whilst disqualified is a custodial sentence.

Avatar
chrisonabike | 1 week ago
1 like

road.cc wrote:

Her home address at the time was about one-and-a-half miles from the premises

Not to encourage intoxicated cycling - just don't ride or drive when intoxicated.  But ... probably 10-15 minutes by bike.  Looks like this is all within an urban area also - some mostly flat routes available.

Choices - drive 1.5 miles to get drunk and drive back.

Avatar
rogerwb replied to chrisonabike | 1 week ago
4 likes

I'd definitely fall off my bike. It's a forty minute walk, good for you after a drinking session.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to rogerwb | 1 week ago
7 likes

I definitely don't recommend riding drunk.  Personal experience - falling in a ditch drunk when young and who knows what could have happened?

It just struck me - the short distance people are driving, as opposed to other means of transport.

As you say, walking is a good idea (although you may be endangering yourself)...  Taxis exist.  Sometimes there's even a bus.

Of course then we get into some people (especially women) are wary (sometimes with very salient reasons) of walking alone at night, or even taking taxis.  But in this case she had company (unfortunate that the partner failed to prevent her driving).

Avatar
FrankH replied to chrisonabike | 1 week ago
0 likes

chrisonabike wrote:

Of course then we get into some people (especially women) are wary (sometimes with very salient reasons) of walking alone at night, or even taking taxis.  But in this case she had company (unfortunate that the partner failed to prevent her driving).

Her partner was also her drinking partner, so probably as drunk as she was and equally impaired.

Avatar
essexian | 1 week ago
7 likes

she had spent around six hours at, drinking "five pints and a measure of spirit".

I trust the publican lost their licence; afterall it is there duty to ensure that people are not drunk and incapable..... what's that, more interested in profit than a cyclists life...?!

And six years for killing someone. Not enough. 

Avatar
NotNigel replied to essexian | 1 week ago
1 like

Serving someone a drink an hour isn't exactly grounds for a pub landlord/lady to lose their licence.  I could regularly drink twice as much as that in the same amount of time back in my going out days.  Granted if they knew they where going to be driving afterwards then yes, there should be some punishment.

Avatar
mattw replied to NotNigel | 1 week ago
4 likes

The report notes that she was shown on camera to be unstable on her feet.

It's an offence under the Licensing Act 2003, also I think to allow your staff to do so.

"Section 141 of the Licensing Act 2003 makes it an offence to knowingly sell or attempt to sell alcohol to a person who is drunk, or to knowingly allow alcohol to be sold to such a person on licensed premises."

https://www.popall.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Drunkeness-Guide-A4-... page 4.

Level 3 fine.

Avatar
john_smith replied to mattw | 1 week ago
5 likes

I have seen people literally fall over when they get off their bikes at the end of a race. Unsteadiness on your feet doesn't imply unfitness to cycle.

Avatar
mattw replied to john_smith | 1 week ago
3 likes

It's not "unfitness to cycle"; it's being obvously drunk at the pub.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to john_smith | 1 week ago
2 likes

john_smith wrote:

I have seen people literally fall over when they get off their bikes at the end of a race. Unsteadiness on your feet doesn't imply unfitness to cycle.

It does if the unsteadiness on your feet is caused by alcohol.

Avatar
NotNigel replied to mattw | 1 week ago
3 likes

"By the time the defendant left with her partner she appeared to be unsteady on her feet."

That's the only report of her being unsteady on her feet - when she left,  not during the course of her being at the pub.

If there is to be blame on anyone else then the partner should bare it.

Avatar
mattw replied to NotNigel | 1 week ago
0 likes

I thnk that 5 pints and a measure of spirits is a bit of a telltale ...

Avatar
NotNigel replied to mattw | 1 week ago
3 likes

A tell tale of what? Are you assuming that the number of drinks is an underestimate or are you saying that the quoted number of drinks is a tell tale sign that they would be in such a state that they shouldn't have been served?  Personally, I don't know anyone who could drink at that pace and be showing the level of drunkness to be refused service...I'd get where you were coming from if it was over a couple of hours, but six hours?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to NotNigel | 1 week ago
1 like

NotNigel wrote:

"By the time the defendant left with her partner she appeared to be unsteady on her feet."

That's the only report of her being unsteady on her feet - when she left,  not during the course of her being at the pub.

And even then the report seems to be from the CCTV footage - there's no report of it happening in sight of the staff, or anyone else at the pub.

Avatar
stonojnr replied to NotNigel | 1 week ago
1 like

That's the thing it states clearly by the time they left, and yet some folk still try to twist the stated facts and invent parts of it to suit their own agendas like some set of rabid newspaper journos.

Avatar
FrankH replied to essexian | 1 week ago
0 likes

essexian wrote:

And six years for killing someone. Not enough. 

And she'll be out and about in three years or less. I don't understand why criminals are sentenced to so many years in prison then they're let out after serving just half (or less now). Why not sentence them to the time they will actually serve?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to FrankH | 1 week ago
3 likes

FrankH wrote:

And she'll be out and about in three years or less. I don't understand why criminals are sentenced to so many years in prison then they're let out after serving just half (or less now). Why not sentence them to the time they will actually serve?

The idea (as I understand it) of automatic early release is to allow for community-based rehabilitation to take place whilst retaining the right to recall offenders to custody in the event of recidivism, so retaining an element of deterrence. The problem is not early release but light sentencing by judges, who know that any sentence they give will be halved. The maximum sentence for causing death by dangerous driving is life imprisonment so the judge in this case had plenty of options, if they wanted her to serve six years they could have sentenced her to twelve. Still not consonant with the nature of the offence, particularly with the alcohol involvement, but at least better than what she did get.

 

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to Rendel Harris | 1 week ago
2 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

[...] The problem is not early release but light sentencing by judges, who know that any sentence they give will be halved. The maximum sentence for causing death by dangerous driving is life imprisonment so the judge in this case had plenty of options, if they wanted her to serve six years they could have sentenced her to twelve. [...]

To be fair to the judge involved, as I understand it judges are required to follow the Sentencing Guidelines. It would appear to me (from the scant information reported) that six years is roughly in line with those guidelines (https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/crown-court/item/causing-d...

(I would have thought this falls under Culpability B; aggrevating factors include the victim being a vulnerable road user and failure to stop at the scene; but mitigating factors (according to the guidelines*) include no previous offences/"good driving record" (at least as far as is mentioned in the reporting) and remorse, along with a discount for the guilty plea).

So I'd probably direct your ire at those in charge of writing the guidelines.

*To be clear, I'm not saying I agree that these ought to be considered "mitigating factors".

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to OnYerBike | 1 week ago
2 likes

Thanks for the link, read with interest. I would say that actually she falls into Category A for culpability for:

Deliberate decision to ignore the rules of the road and disregard for the risk of danger to others
Driving highly impaired by consumption of alcohol and/or drugs
Speed significantly in excess of speed limit or highly inappropriate for the prevailing road or weather conditions

And as you say, from the aggravating factors section:

Victim was a vulnerable road user, including pedestrians, cyclists, horse riders, motorcyclists etc
Failed to stop and/or obstructed or hindered attempts to assist at the scene

Enough there for the highest bracket, I would argue.

Pages

Latest Comments