A London cyclist has tweeted about how he was left-hooked by a taxi driver as he rode along a protected cycle route on Westminster Bridge, and believes that the design of a floating bus stop is to blame because it does not make motorists who are planning to turn left slow down.
The incident happened yesterday afternoon at 4pm as the rider, Niklas, headed across the bridge towards Waterloo, with the taxi driver turning across his path to enter the Marriott London County Hall Hotel that occupies part of the headquarters of the former Greater London Council, causing him to brake sharply to avoid running straight into the vehicle.
On the side of Westminster Bridge that Niklas was riding on, there is a bus lane and a mandatory, painted cycle lane with the floating bus stop just before the hotel providing a section of protected cycleway to the left (the entrance to which is often blocked by pedicab drivers touting for fares, and at times an ice cream van).
The photograph at the top of this article clearly shows how the kerbing at the end of the bus lane side of the island curves towards the hotel – and the left turn can therefore be taken by a driver at a higher speed than if there were more of a right angle to the kerb.
Replying to a commenter on his tweets, Niklas said he may have been safer going straight ahead, rather than using the cycle lane.
Niklas told road.cc: “The cabbie did stop, was apologetic and admitted fault. I do of course blame the driver for the awful manoeuvre, but the real culprit is the shit road layout that enables it, plus having the bus stop blocking the view both ways.
“Thankfully I had no bad injuries, as I reacted quick enough to scrub most of my speed and managed to avoid a head-on collision. It would probably have hurt a lot more if I’d contacted the side of the cab with my face, instead of my shoulder and hip.
“There was a third party who also came to ask me whether I was okay, someone with a badge around their neck,” he continued.
“Thinking back, I'm not sure if it was the bus driver (stopped at the bus stop) or just someone who happened to be there.
“I was probably so full of adrenaline I wasn't really thinking straight. I was also meeting some people and wanted to carry on.
“I do remember I did check myself and the bike before I hopped back on the bike and carried on.
“There was no damage to the bike,” he added, “I’m pretty sure the Kona Paddy Wagon could survive the apocalypse.”
The floating bus stops on the Lambeth side of the bridge, and particularly the one on the opposite carriageway, outside St Thomas’ Hospital, encountered strong opposition when plans were first announced, with opponents claiming they would put hospital visitors, including patients and the disabled, at risk from cyclists.
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust admitted in 2016 that the “serious concerns” it raised regarding patient safety were merely opinions rather than being based on evidence.
> Hospital admits it didn't research bike lane it tried to block
Niklas’ experience shows however that on the County Hall side at least, the design is one that can put cyclists in danger.
Simon Munk, campaigns manager at London Cycling Campaign (LCC), said: “LCC fought really hard to get cycle tracks on Westminster Bridge. Several powerful stakeholders opposed the tracks or elements of them.
“The compromises and weaknesses in the end design have to do with how, despite there apparently being an all-powerful cycling lobby, London’s stakeholders often weaken schemes.
“Despite that, this scheme still is a vital link across the river when most bridges remain far more hostile to cycling, and we’re glad they’re there.
“We urge Niklas to make use of our free legal helpline if he’s a member (other orgs also provide such a service) and if others have had similar experiences at this point, please contact LCC and we’ll try and bring more pressure to bear here on getting improvements.
“As ever, perfect cycle schemes don’t exist, and the ones London gets are often down to the hard graft of staff and borough volunteers at LCC.”
Add new comment
8 comments
One solution would be for it to be illegal to overtake a bus, whilst it drops off passengers - just like school buses, in the US
A speed hump (or trough, depending on drainage) parallel and roadside of the cycle lane would instantaneously solve the problem of cabbies swinging into the hotel entrance at speed. The first time they do it, and feel their chassis yee-yaw sickeningly over the obstacle diagonal to their line of travel, will be etched into their reflexes, and they won't do it a second time.
"I 'ad one of those cyclists in the back of me cab once - it was 'er own bloody fault though. Still, five quid on the meter before I could stop".
I've had a similar incident (but managed to stop in time) last week. The entrance to the hotel is not obvious from the bike lane and Taxis do turn in fast there. A tighter conrner would help and maybea sign reminding Taxis that there is a cycle lane there.
And change the dotted line to a give way line.
Theyll still ignore that, I'd extend the floating bus stop to beyond the entrance, so it becomes a table top style ramp for them, or add a line of speed bump style armadillos, might slow them down a bit too.
Crazy though you have to design stuff like that in that way, even with a bus in the way how did the taxi driver not see cyclists already using the cycle lane and not anticipate there to be any.
A) because he didn't look and didn't anticipate.
Should have been at the very least anticipating pedestrians alighting from the bus and crossing the hotel entrance. But I suspect in truth the only instinct was to get round infront of the bus ASAP before it could move off.
well yes Id figured that...it was more my exasperation about having to build additional protective layers into something to stop someone driving in to a cyclist, when theyve already had ample opportunity to avoid doing exactly that if they were just looking, thinking ahead and maybe driving just sensibly for once.